https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Procurement


Article

Forum matters: procurement judgment

Forum matters: procurement judgment

  • Written by Lisa Premo, Stéphanie Dion, Michael Thornton and Victor Leamer
  • 19th November 2019

In August 2019, I traveled to my sixth NIGP Annual Forum. I have enjoyed every Forum since the 2014 Forum in Philadelphia, but this year surpassed all previous years in terms of establishing and strengthening relationships, building teams, and gaining knowledge. As an NIGP staff member, I have the privilege of working virtually with procurement professionals, academics, and suppliers throughout the year. Forum presents an opportunity to meet these amazing volunteers in person. Forum is also my opportunity to support task force members who have developed guidance for public procurement practices by attending their sessions.

Attendance at the session by Stéphanie Dion, Victor Leamer, and Michael Thornton on Request for Proposals: Different, but not Difficult was one such session. These procurement professionals, along with Sharon Rothwell and Distinguished Service Award Winner Stacy Gregg formed the NIGP task force that developed the recently published practice on Request for Proposals (RFPs).

Support and camaraderie motivated my attendance. How could I have known that a nuance about procurement policy was about to come my way? At NIGP, I manage the Accreditation Program and conduct the preliminary review for Outstanding Agency Achievement Accreditation Award (OA4) submissions. With each application review, I had become increasingly convinced of the importance of policies that support and specify the authority and responsibility of Procurement.

The Forum presentation threw a wrench into or, more accurately, helped scaffold and deepen that understanding. The team underscored that policies should be general enough to allow for procurement judgment and flexibility.

Procurement judgment refers to the values, education, expertise, and experience of procurement professionals that are applied to decisions and actions. Public procurement values, i.e., accountability, ethics, impartiality, professionalism, service, and transparency, were developed from the public procurement pillars of public service, public trust, and justice. Procurement expertise includes performance of specialized skills, knowledge, and competencies. Examples include market, cost, price, value and spend analysis; enabling regulations and compliance; sourcing and solicitation methods; contract management and performance; and relationship management with internal clients and suppliers.

The American Bar Association’s Model Procurement Code §3-203 Competitive Sealed Proposals, (1) Conditions for Use. provides an example of flexible wording that allows for the use of an RFP and defers to the judgment of the Chief Procurement Office or head of Procurement to decide when to use it.
A contract may be entered into by competitive sealed proposals when the Chief Procurement Officer, the head of a Purchasing Agency, or a designee of either officer above the level of the Procurement Officer determines in writing, pursuant to regulations, that the use of competitive sealed bidding is either not practicable or not advantageous to the [State].

In a profession that is moving swiftly from a reactive, transactional function to a proactive, strategic function, the more flexibility and latitude provided in policies, the better and more often procurement professionals can apply their judgment. How many of us have been stuck in the loop of an automated call or spoken to an employee with a script? Progress is impossible. Perhaps we press zero multiple times until we are connected to a real person or we ask to speak to a supervisor. Either way, we want to interact with someone with authority and professional judgment who can understand our situation and resolve it.

Judgment is necessary, too, as not every situation can be predicted. Nor do we want to be suffocated in infinite numbers of “Dolores Umbridge Decrees” to cover every known condition or circumstance. For scenarios that we can and do plan for, there still may be unintended consequences. Policies can guide us, but each situation is unique. Judgment informed by values, education, expertise, and experience is crucial.

Policies should enable, not restrict. They should state the overarching principles guiding procurement operations and allow for professional judgment. Judgment may direct procurement professionals to consult with other stakeholders and experts, for example, when providing technical advice and interpreting the intent of legislation. Judgment plays a role, too, in the analysis of situations and procurements, which require consideration of multiple factor such as policies and procedures, precedents, trade agreements, historical practice, risk tolerance, and operational requirements.

The more that procurement professionals successfully apply judgment, the more likely they may be regarded as trusted strategic partners. The ever-increasing demands of procurement are best served through flexible policies applied through professional judgment. Decisions and actions can then align with public procurement values and guiding principles to respond to entity needs and fulfill Procurement’s responsibility to achieve public service, public trust, and justice.

Lisa Premo is NIGP Global Practices Manager, and Stéphanie Dion, Michael Thornton and Victor Leamer are NIGP RFP Task Force members.

Tags: Procurement Procurement Article

Related


  • Cooperative agreements and other tools can help lean-staffed procurement squads
    In 2021, county budgets are fairly tight, says John D. Tigert, purchasing services manager in Dorchester County, S.C.“Procurement budgets are largely staying the same, with outliers of course, depending on how the organization collects revenue and to what degree that revenue collection was impacted by COVID-19. Most procurement departments tend to run a very lean […]
  • Tennessee purchasing crew fine-tunes its pandemic response
    When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, the two-person procurement team at Knoxville’s (Tenn.) Community Development Corp. (KCDC) leaped into action, says Terry McKee, IT and procurement director. “We immediately began seeking personal protective equipment (PPE) and supplies, which is not something that we have needed much of in the past. We also became the one open […]
  • New American City & County survey identifies biggest problems facing public procurement departments in pandemic
    A new, ongoing public procurement survey from American City & County and Bonfire shows that over half of surveyed procurement departments are struggling with their supply chains during the pandemic. So far, 66.67 percent of respondents have said that navigating supply chain shortages was a point of strain in their procurement processes in the pandemic. […]
  • Lessons from the pandemic: Emergency sourcing of lifesaving equipment
    Being able to conceive and implement new procurement models in times of crisis requires resourcefulness, tenacity and teamwork.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Procurement Ponderable: Dealing with anxiety and depression
  • What does it really mean to be “green” from a public procurement perspective?
  • What tune will you play?
  • COVID-19 and energy: The critical need for expert advice

White papers


Discover How Public Sector Officials are Monitoring and Managing Overtime in This New White Paper

22nd February 2021

How to Assemble a Successful Government Grant Proposal

5th February 2021

The Rise of Procurement’s Next Normal

5th February 2021
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities winner: El Paso County, Texas’ pretrial justice modernization dlvr.it/Rv4GKL

6th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

A city’s innovative downtown master plan sees future in local, inclusive placemaking dlvr.it/Rv3SfM

5th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities winner: Gainesville, Fla. closes Dignity Village and houses its homeless population dlvr.it/Rv1GS2

5th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities Winner: South Bay Cities Council of Governments’ South Bay Fiber Network dlvr.it/Rv10b7

5th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

Senate American Rescue Plan includes more than $60 million in direct aid for counties dlvr.it/RtzvBK

4th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

ASCE releases 2021 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure dlvr.it/Rtvck5

3rd March 2021
AmerCityCounty

Updating the assessor report: A new approach dlvr.it/RttvDv

3rd March 2021
AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities winner: Phases 2 and 3 of Minot, N.D.’s Mouse River Enhanced Flood Protection Plan dlvr.it/RtrWMC

3rd March 2021

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X