https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Procurement


Article

Five Keys to Negotiating Energy Supply Agreements

Five Keys to Negotiating Energy Supply Agreements

  • Written by Bob Wooten
  • 16th October 2018

We are now on the final piece in our series on negotiating energy supply agreements – material change language. This wraps up the five-part discussion, which also offered our insights in the other four keys:

1. Payment terms
2. Termination fees
3. Adding and deleting accounts
4. Usage bandwidth

Material change language is something of a “catch-all” with regards to whether the customer is charged the contracted rate, or a different rate based on “material changes” in energy usage, perhaps due to operational or business changes.

Clarify Collateral Requirements

Many times material change language is broad enough that it touches upon several aspects of the supply agreement. If there is a change in the operations of the company, such as increases in production lines or shutting down of a facility, this can be interpreted as a material change by the energy supplier. Other times this is defined by a change in credit standing. The supply agreement often includes the requirement of “performance assurance” or collateral in the event of material change, and these situations of change in standing can cause the supplier to seek adjustments in the contracted supply rate.

Unfortunately for the buyer, the language is often left to the interpretation of the supplier. This can lead to unforeseen – and unbudgeted – costs. If the contract language asks for collateral, this typically takes the form of two to three months’ worth of bills posted as performance assurance. This often creates a battle over whether these measures are warranted in situations where a “negative” change in the customer’s standing is not clearly defined.

Understand Change in Usage and Bandwidth Language

The more common use of material change language has to do with changes in the customer’s operations that result in changes in usage. Let’s say you are a manufacturer, and your production has dramatically increased such that your energy usage is now doubled on a regular basis. This would be considered a “material change” in usage as defined by the supplier.

Remember that there is a distinction between “usage bandwidth” (which we discussed at length in the fourth installment of this series) and “material change.” Usage bandwidth applies to adjustments in your actual energy usage, given you are still operating as you normally would; material change deals with adjustments in your organization’s operations that are considered a more permanent change resulting in drastically higher or lower energy usage.

A material change comes about when your operations have changed on a regular and/or permanent basis, and this results in an ongoing increase or decrease to your usage. For most energy (electricity or natural gas) contracts, the supplier purchases the energy based on the estimates of your future use. If you suddenly – or consistently – use more or less than expected, the supplier must then either buy extra energy in the market or sell unused energy back. This can result in a potential loss for the supplier.

So even though your contract may have language saying that you have 100 percent usage bandwidth, a material change can trump that language and result in fees, penalties, or even a change in price that will have an effect on your overall budget.

Define the “Material Change”

As we mentioned during our discussion about changes in a company’s standing or energy usage, the key consideration is how that situation is measured. Material change language in a supply agreement can be very gray, leaving the definition – and resulting actions – up to the supplier’s assessment. In these cases, there is usually a significant back and forth between lawyers that leads to more time and cost.

Therefore, it is always a good idea for you, as the energy procurer, to push for a tighter definition of material change in the agreement before signing. Begin by requesting specific contract language to state that the energy usage must exceed a certain percentage of the estimated usage to qualify as a material change. You can further clarify your contract by adding verbiage stating that this change must take place for several months in a row, which would then be more indicative of some type of company change leading to more or less usage.

The result of a material change can range from the supplier updating the contract to reflect a different price to the supplier assessing a fee very similar to an “early termination fee.” Either way, you should pay attention to how this is defined so that you don’t end up paying something that is not reflective of the actual damages to the supplier.

Reach a Good Compromise

All of the five key factors we have discussed throughout this series are crucial to address before you sign any supply agreement with an energy supplier. By leaving these considerations unaddressed, you are really at the mercy of an agreement that most assuredly is written by the suppliers’ lawyers and puts much of the risk onto you as the buyer.

Price moves with risk. If you put all the risk on the supplier, you will pay a higher price. Avoid the temptation to get the very lowest price by agreeing to less favorable terms that put all the risk on you. If you, as the buyer, bear the risk with each of these five key factors, you have a very good possibility of paying more than you anticipated through the associated fees that come along with it. This then undoes your goal of getting the lowest price.

The goal is to arrive at a mutually agreeable compromise where each party is shouldering an appropriate amount of risk. A good compromise is where both parties are sharing risk and the price is then reflective of this. Now that you know what to consider, you can avoid the possible loopholes that pushes the risk onto your shoulders.

Bob Wooten, C.P.M., CEP, is Director of National Accounts for Tradition Energy, and has over 20 years of experience managing commercial, industrial and governmental procurement programs for a wide variety of clients. Bob holds professional certifications from the Association of Energy Engineers and the Institute for Supply Management, as well as a B.A. from Texas A&M University, and a Master’s in Public Administration from the University of Houston.

Tags: Procurement Procurement Article

Related


  • American City & County’s 2020 Crown Communities Awards
    Projects nominated for American City & County's annual Crown Communities Awards are judged on uniqueness, short- and long-term value to the community and effective/innovative financing.
  • Cooperative agreements and other tools can help lean-staffed procurement squads
    In 2021, county budgets are fairly tight, says John D. Tigert, purchasing services manager in Dorchester County, S.C.“Procurement budgets are largely staying the same, with outliers of course, depending on how the organization collects revenue and to what degree that revenue collection was impacted by COVID-19. Most procurement departments tend to run a very lean […]
  • Tennessee purchasing crew fine-tunes its pandemic response
    When the COVID-19 pandemic hit, the two-person procurement team at Knoxville’s (Tenn.) Community Development Corp. (KCDC) leaped into action, says Terry McKee, IT and procurement director. “We immediately began seeking personal protective equipment (PPE) and supplies, which is not something that we have needed much of in the past. We also became the one open […]
  • New American City & County survey identifies biggest problems facing public procurement departments in pandemic
    A new, ongoing public procurement survey from American City & County and Bonfire shows that over half of surveyed procurement departments are struggling with their supply chains during the pandemic. So far, 66.67 percent of respondents have said that navigating supply chain shortages was a point of strain in their procurement processes in the pandemic. […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Demonstrating the value of procurement: A call to action
  • Procurement Ponderable: Dealing with anxiety and depression
  • What does it really mean to be “green” from a public procurement perspective?
  • What tune will you play?

White papers


Discover How Public Sector Officials are Monitoring and Managing Overtime in This New White Paper

22nd February 2021

How to Assemble a Successful Government Grant Proposal

5th February 2021

The Rise of Procurement’s Next Normal

5th February 2021
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities winner: Harris County, Texas, Precinct 2’s ACCESS2HEALTH SmartPod dlvr.it/Rtm06B

1st March 2021
AmerCityCounty

How technology can ensure equitable access to the COVID-19 vaccine dlvr.it/RtlLNC

1st March 2021
AmerCityCounty

American City & County’s 2020 Exemplary Public Servant of the Year Award dlvr.it/RtZbX2

26th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

American City & County’s 2020 Crown Communities Awards dlvr.it/RtZbVz

26th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities Awards winner: Rock Hill, S.C.’s My Ride dlvr.it/RtZSFp

26th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

Three communities hosting Augmented Reality Developer Challenge competitions dlvr.it/RtZ94D

26th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

Using data to improve emergency response resources dlvr.it/RtVSc0

25th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

How small cities are tackling lead service line replacement dlvr.it/RtV9G8

25th February 2021

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X