https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Public Works & Utilities


Article

Water costs on the rise

Water costs on the rise

As costs rise, care must be taken to ensure the future of municipal water
  • Written by Derek Prall
  • 13th May 2013

Local government spending on water treatment and infrastructure has increased for the past 60 years, and now, with spending reaching record highs, experts say municipalities must understand the risks of current cost allocation practices in order to make water affordable in the future.

From 2001 to 2010, municipalities spent $864 billion on water supplies and wastewater management programs, and in 2011 local governments set a new record, spending $111.4 billion. Several factors affect the growing level of public water investment, including infrastructure revitalization and construction, operational cost increases, population growth and inflation. A report released by the United States Conference of Mayors (USCM) claims that this magnitude of spending will continue.

The EPA estimates that drinking water infrastructure investments will need $334.8 billion between 2007 and 2027, with an additional $298.1 billion for waste and storm water management between 2008 and 2028. The USCM report estimates that these costs, combined with retrofitting pipes as well as the replacement, renovation and construction of treatment plants, total costs could be from 2.8 to 4.8 trillion over the next 20 years.

Furthermore, the cost of operations and maintenance has increased over time, according to the report, with regulatory standards under the Clean Water Act and Safe Drinking Water Act for the past 40 years having direct influence over design, technology choices and operation of facilities. The report credits these factors in the overall cost of service, long-term borrowing and user rates for public water.

A March 2013 report from the American Society of Civil Engineers gave the nation’s wastewater infrastructure a “D-plus” grade and estimated $298 billion must be made in capital investments over the next 20 years, according to an American City & County April feature.

Additionally, local government spending on public water consistently exceeds the rate of inflation.In 2001, local government spending on wastewater was $8.8 billion. The Bureau of Economic Analysis’ inflation factors would suggest a 45 percent increase in spending on this sector, or an expected 12.8 billion investment in 2010, just to keep up with inflation. Actual wastewater capital investment in 2010 was 20.6 billion, according to the report.

The U.S. population was roughly 210 million in 1972 and has grown 47 percent since then. According to the report, 80 percent of these individuals rely on municipal water, and it is estimated U.S. Metro populations will grow by 32 percent by 2042. These individuals will require additional public water services and infrastructure.

With the costs of water mounting, the report suggests local government officials should be concerned with better understanding the financial burdens placed on ratepayers to ensure a viable future for public water. To ensure local government’s abilities to provide water in the future, the report suggests two factors must be analyzed: how rate structures impact lower and middle class households, as well as long-term debt and creditworthiness.

A concern for local governments, according to the report, is water’s financial impact on households at or below the poverty level. Current public water cost allocation plans that rely on uniform user class pricing can place a burden on lower income households, and must be assessed to determine if such pricing schemes are sustainable within a community.  

According to a USA today study of 100 municipalities, prices at least doubled in more than a quarter of cities and tripled in three – Atlanta, San Francisco and Wilmington, Del.

Despite programs to help cut the costs of water for those with low incomes, one Philadelphia-based participant the study revealed price increases forced her to make decisions between food and water. The monthly cost of 1,000 cubic feet of water in Philadelphia jumped 164%, to $39.22, since 2001 according to the USA Today study.

Community creditworthiness is also important because it influences the ability of governments to obtain low interest loans. In order to maintain current infrastructures, as well as finance necessary projects in the future, the USCM report suggests local governments must manage financial risks in order to cultivate strong credit ratings in order to maintain favorable interest rates.

Historically, local governments are the dominant investor in public water. From the adoption of the Clean Water Act in 1972, $1.77 trillion has been spent on water’s processing and infrastructure, according to the report. In order to sustain this infrastructure and comply with regulatory mandates, local governments have had to raise rates and increase long-term borrowing.

Because of this, per capita spending on local public water has increased. The report found that on average individuals spent $284 on water in 1995, $443 in 2005 and $539 in 2010.

To read the full .PDF, click here

Tags: Public Works & Utilities Article

Related


  • Cleveland launches program to create circular rconomy
    The City of Cleveland and Cleveland Neighborhood Progress announced the launch of Circular Cleveland, a two-year initiative to develop and implement circular economy strategies and programs in Cleveland. Inspired by similar models in cities around the world, the circular economy is a comprehensive approach to provide community-wide benefits by designing waste and pollution out of our economic system, keeping […]
  • St. Lucie county adds foam polystyrene recycling program
    St. Lucie County, Fla., residents and businesses will now be able to recycle more foam polystyrene products, thanks to a $50,000 grant from the Foam Recycling Coalition. After starting a single-stream program in 2014, St. Lucie County has seen a continuous increase in the tonnage being processed at the St. Lucie Materials Recovery Facility, as […]
  • City of Tega Cay, S.C., wants residents to go through neighbors' trash
    The city of Tega Cay in South Carolina has asked residents to remain vigilant in spotting recycling contamination. Officials have stated that they are considering canceling the city’s recycling program because of “truckloads” of rejected residential recycling materials. In fact, Tega Cay councilpersons are asking for volunteers to inspect what goes into residents’ recycle bins […]
  • The case for ozone in potable reuse and emerging contaminant treatment
    As communities take steps to provide reliable long-term water supplies through potable reuse and ensure that our waters are safe by mitigating threats to water quality, ozone will be one part of a suite of building blocks for creating the most effective treatment process

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Vermont city uses sewer surveillance to halt spread of COVID-19
  • Industry and government collaboration key to addressing recycling challenges
  • Swissdale, Penn., is turning food waste into nutrient-rich fertilizer
  • Ohio governor wants to ban local governments from regulating single-use plastics

White papers


How a unified HR system helps one public safety organization manage crews, payroll, and more in a single platform

7th January 2021

Your Roadmap to COVID-19 Funding

18th December 2020

The One Where Everyone Wins: A Mutually Beneficial Contracting Method

10th December 2020
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

The latest episode The Young Leaders Podcast focuses on Cyril Jefferson. Cyril is the youngest African American to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Hillsboro, Oregon is pioneering a new #renewableenergy generation technology through a partnership with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

The impact of the #COVID19 pandemic on #telework was swift and profound. Now, the big question is whether – and to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Get ready for the can't-miss webinar on how to kickstart your efficiency improvement plan with Luke Anderson of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Among all states headed into the 2020 general election, which ones have voting populations that are the most demogr… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts in our readership survey to help us shape future content so that we c… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

See how cities different approaches to distribute masks in their communities >> spr.ly/6010GAPLa

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

While #facialrecognition is a powerful tool that can improve law enforcement efficiency, that doesn’t necessarily t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X