https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Procurement


Procurement Ponderable responses

Procurement Ponderable responses

GoPro readers respond to a hypothetical scenario from the December/January issue involving a contract awarded to a fraudulent woman-owned and minority-owned business.
  • Written by American City & County Administrator
  • 1st February 2011

Procurement Ponderable

Last issue’s Procurement Ponderable struck a nerve with GoPro readers, who submitted an unprecedented number of responses to the hypothetical scenario designed to stimulate thought and discussion on significant issues in the profession. The dilemma involved “you” as the director of procurement for a large city who is being urged by the mayor to quickly increase the level of participation by woman-owned and minority-owned (WMBE) businesses in city contracts. You award a contract for a controversial road project to a construction company on the basis of a lower evaluated bid price and a committed level of WMBE participation. You later find that the principal subcontractor is not an independent firm at all. Its listed address is the same as the prime contractor, its president is the wife of the prime contractor and the subcontractor has no assets in its name. Here is a sampling of reader responses to the scenario:


I read your article referencing the dilemma that the purchasing director would face after awarding a contract to a supplier that was using his wife as a front company on an awarded job. Of course, this would be an awkward position to be in, but most municipalities avoid this by, first, having a certification process in place. Next, appropriate penalties should be delineated in the RFP. Once discovered, those penalties should be immediately initiated.

Finally, make the penalties as public as possible. Open each future pre-bid conference with a statement reminding all bidders that recently a firm was caught trying to circumvent the system, and that firm shall not act in any capacity, either as a prime or sub for a period of time (i.e., three years or greater, as specified in the RFP). Any firm that chooses to use them on one of the municipality’s projects shall receive the same penalties. However, building relationships with the community, including non-minority and women bidders, makes a pretty strong alliance against fraudulent setups such as this. The community can be your eyes and ears.

— Errick Young, Manager
Orange County (Fla.) Business Development


What should you have done? Exercise the right to check references. If the WMBE is not a real company, the references should bring out the truth. Ask the supplier for a list of three to six similar projects over the last three years [on which] they have used this WMBE. I think you will quickly realize that the bid is a sham.

What can you do now? Unfortunately we are in a time where all of us need to rely on our legal resources in this type of matter. It would be nice if you could just have a meeting with the prime contractor, but they are already at fault. I would discuss with legal the next steps and what they advise.

If this large city has a debarment or suspension list, then the supplier should be added to the list.

What can you do to prevent what happened in this case from happening again? Change your bid form. You need to have the prime prove that the WMBE subcontractor is an actual business. Ask for direct references from the subcontractor as well as the prime. Also, tighten up the specifications on your next IFB with the stated goals and the purpose of the program.

Another suggestion is to conduct interviews with the prime and the WMBE subcontractor. This will normally provide the necessary information to make sure you have a valid subcontractor.

— Scott Duncan, C.P.M.
Contracting Supervisor
Procurement and Contract Services
Colorado Springs Utilities


I found the article to be very thought-provoking and a very good scenario. As we all know in procurement, the construction contract, along with the services contract, can be the most difficult of the contracts to execute, given the amount of potential risk involved. Although given the facts of this scenario, all seems to be going all right in terms of the work that is being produced. There are still a number of things to think about going forward:

  • 1. Contract Management – After speaking with the mayor regarding the increase in the level of participation in WMBEs, and the short amount of time given for research and analysis, I feel that due diligence in this area particularly should have resulted in the exposure of the principal subcontractor and prime contractor being one and the same. There are procedures to be followed as well as committees that should have checked on these types of things prior to awarding the contract. I would think that this would have been researched as a non-responsive bidder, mitigating risk, past performances, certifications and warranties, contract clauses and debriefing the vendors at pre-bid meetings.
  • 2. Breach of Contract – The contract was awarded to this company based on the evaluated bid price and not the actual bid price being the lowest. Are there grounds for termination at this point or would the loss at this point, outweigh the action warranted? Was there a clause in the contract to address this risk?
  • 3. Conflict of Interest – Since the prime contractor and principal subcontractor are the same entity, is there a conflict of interest here?

In conclusion, what we need to look at is the entire contract management process. There were obviously some steps that were not taken or considered. The integrity of the process for bids should never be compromised due to time limits. The result will always be a not-so-favorable outcome for the administration of the contract. I would like to know how this project ended. Did the monies that were to be allocated to the WMBEs reach their destination? Take the potential problems from this scenario and use them in future procurement dealings.

— Gina L. Mobley, CPPB
Buyer Assistant I/II/III
Fairfax County (Va.) Public Schools/OPS


What should you have done? Instead of taking the information provided by the prime contractor at face value, the Director of Procurement should have conducted research into the companies that were offered by all of the prime contractors as WMBE subcontractors. Most states have registries of Certified WMBE contractors and the listing would provide a beginning point for one’s research. If that had been done, the pretense should have been uncovered and the contract awarded to the proper prime contractor.

What can you do now? In the State of Florida, under the circumstances of this “Procurement Ponderable,” the prime contractor would be found in breach of his contract. If that is the case, all payments that exist under the contract may be suspended immediately. If the prime contractor is able to prove that he tried in good faith to follow the terms of the contract and was unable to do so, suspended payments may be paid. If he is unable to prove a good faith attendance to the terms of the contract, “all amounts paid to the contractor or firm under the state contract intended for expenditure with the certified minority business enterprises shall be forfeited and recoverable by the Department of Legal Affairs.” (F.S. 287.094(2)) Also, the contract can be terminated and the prime contractor required to return goods that have been received and funds that have been paid.

What can you do to prevent what happened in this case from happening again? You can begin by following better practices of verification when certifications are required. As stated above, most states provide Certified WMBE registries and by not finding the name of the purported WMBE subcontractor on the registry, one would insist on being provided with a certification. Additionally, in the State of Florida, “Any county, municipality, community college or district school board may set aside up to 10 percent or more of the total amount of funds allocated for the procurement of personal property and services for the purpose of entering into contracts with minority business enterprises.” (F.S. 287.093) This allowance removes the prime contractor from the process and allows the WMBEs to deal directly with the purchasing entities.

— Lysle W. Robinson, FCCM, FCCN
Purchasing Analyst
Department of Management Services
Departmental Purchasing
Tallahassee, Fla.


In response to your December /January 2001 issue ‘Procurement Ponderable,” quite succinctly consider the following:

  • One cannot ever shortcut research and analysis.
  • Use only certified WMBEs. (This requires some level of in-depth sleuthing!)
  • Get informal and formal assessments from colleagues regarding their work and especially note/tag any suspicions anyone may have had about their true status as a WMBE.

I hope this isn’t too simple a response, but the simpler and more direct we are in assessing contractors, the better the outcomes are in the long run. In this instance, determining a vendor’s “true identity” is to many more important than the product. This is fraudulent behavior which may carry serious consequences, therefore forcing some to investigate this vendor’s work history and possibly raise more questions.

— Diane Ward
Director of Program Resource Management
New York City Department of Correction
Programs and Discharge Planning Division


Go Pro welcomes your feedback. Send letters to: [email protected] or Go Pro, 6151 Powers Ferry Road NW, Suite 200, Atlanta GA 30339, Attn.: Bill Wolpin. We reserve the right to edit all letters for clarity, brevity, grammar, punctuation, syntax and style.

Tags: Procurement

Most Recent


  • recruit
    With a few strategies and tools, public procurement directors can recruit new, diverse staffers
    Yes, being a public purchasing professional is a much-coveted career that can have a big impact on a community, says Celeste Frye, principal and CEO of Public Works Partners, a WBE/DBE/SBE-certified urban planning and consulting firm. “From purchasing quality foods for school lunches or environmentally sustainable trucks for trash collection, procurement managers have a significant […]
  • electric vehicles
    How data can drive electric vehicle funding
    Transportation is the highest greenhouse gas-emitting sector in the United States, with cars, trucks, commercial aircraft, trains and other sources producing, by most estimates, around 30 percent of all carbon emissions in the country. Electric vehicles (EV) have the potential to reshape the transportation sector and support state and local decarbonization efforts. Private EV use […]
  • digital construction
    More dollars will be available for infrastructure projects and digital construction management in 2023
    Cities and counties are preparing for an increase in project funding, mainly through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL), says Matt Sprague, industry strategy director – local government at Trimble. His firm is an industrial technology company that offers a variety of integrated infrastructure solutions. The solutions enable better decision-making by connecting the right information with […]
  • diverse hiring
    Cities and counties can take several steps to assemble a diverse pool of job candidates
    Local governments can expand diversity in their workforces in several ways, says Joan C. Williams, director of the Center for WorkLife Law, professor at the University of California, Hastings College of Law and author of the book “Bias Interrupted.” These approaches, she adds, can help public entities and other organizations recruit more professionals from under-represented […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Filling staff vacancies as workers retire is a priority for procurement administrators
  • A call to action: Moving procurement past its pre-pandemic mindset
  • Making deals: Cooperative agreements can help governments achieve supplier diversity goals
  • Procurement methods go to the head of the class in the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022

Learn the benefits of transforming and automating your Contract Management process

4th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023

10 American cities with a great downtown

24th January 2023

Miami leads the way in FT-Nikkei ranking of best U.S. cities for foreign companies

20th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient dlvr.it/ShYNcx

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Shifting city demographics present an opportunity to build coalitions, address inequality dlvr.it/ShYMMm

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Spending American Rescue Plan Act funds: A primer for municipalities dlvr.it/ShXzvl

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand dlvr.it/ShVhBW

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Managing landslides along road corridors using remote sensing dlvr.it/ShTpL6

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Prioritizing neighborhood infill, expanding transit options increases neighborhood resilience dlvr.it/ShRrFM

25th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

10 American cities with a great downtown dlvr.it/ShNxXH

24th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

With a few strategies and tools, public procurement directors can recruit new, diverse staffers dlvr.it/ShNnj4

24th January 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.