https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Procurement


Procurement Ponderable responses

Procurement Ponderable responses

GoPro readers respond to a hypothetical scenario from the December/January issue involving a contract awarded to a fraudulent woman-owned and minority-owned business.
  • Written by American City & County Administrator
  • 1st February 2011

Procurement Ponderable

Last issue’s Procurement Ponderable struck a nerve with GoPro readers, who submitted an unprecedented number of responses to the hypothetical scenario designed to stimulate thought and discussion on significant issues in the profession. The dilemma involved “you” as the director of procurement for a large city who is being urged by the mayor to quickly increase the level of participation by woman-owned and minority-owned (WMBE) businesses in city contracts. You award a contract for a controversial road project to a construction company on the basis of a lower evaluated bid price and a committed level of WMBE participation. You later find that the principal subcontractor is not an independent firm at all. Its listed address is the same as the prime contractor, its president is the wife of the prime contractor and the subcontractor has no assets in its name. Here is a sampling of reader responses to the scenario:


I read your article referencing the dilemma that the purchasing director would face after awarding a contract to a supplier that was using his wife as a front company on an awarded job. Of course, this would be an awkward position to be in, but most municipalities avoid this by, first, having a certification process in place. Next, appropriate penalties should be delineated in the RFP. Once discovered, those penalties should be immediately initiated.

Finally, make the penalties as public as possible. Open each future pre-bid conference with a statement reminding all bidders that recently a firm was caught trying to circumvent the system, and that firm shall not act in any capacity, either as a prime or sub for a period of time (i.e., three years or greater, as specified in the RFP). Any firm that chooses to use them on one of the municipality’s projects shall receive the same penalties. However, building relationships with the community, including non-minority and women bidders, makes a pretty strong alliance against fraudulent setups such as this. The community can be your eyes and ears.

— Errick Young, Manager
Orange County (Fla.) Business Development


What should you have done? Exercise the right to check references. If the WMBE is not a real company, the references should bring out the truth. Ask the supplier for a list of three to six similar projects over the last three years [on which] they have used this WMBE. I think you will quickly realize that the bid is a sham.

What can you do now? Unfortunately we are in a time where all of us need to rely on our legal resources in this type of matter. It would be nice if you could just have a meeting with the prime contractor, but they are already at fault. I would discuss with legal the next steps and what they advise.

If this large city has a debarment or suspension list, then the supplier should be added to the list.

What can you do to prevent what happened in this case from happening again? Change your bid form. You need to have the prime prove that the WMBE subcontractor is an actual business. Ask for direct references from the subcontractor as well as the prime. Also, tighten up the specifications on your next IFB with the stated goals and the purpose of the program.

Another suggestion is to conduct interviews with the prime and the WMBE subcontractor. This will normally provide the necessary information to make sure you have a valid subcontractor.

— Scott Duncan, C.P.M.
Contracting Supervisor
Procurement and Contract Services
Colorado Springs Utilities


I found the article to be very thought-provoking and a very good scenario. As we all know in procurement, the construction contract, along with the services contract, can be the most difficult of the contracts to execute, given the amount of potential risk involved. Although given the facts of this scenario, all seems to be going all right in terms of the work that is being produced. There are still a number of things to think about going forward:

  • 1. Contract Management – After speaking with the mayor regarding the increase in the level of participation in WMBEs, and the short amount of time given for research and analysis, I feel that due diligence in this area particularly should have resulted in the exposure of the principal subcontractor and prime contractor being one and the same. There are procedures to be followed as well as committees that should have checked on these types of things prior to awarding the contract. I would think that this would have been researched as a non-responsive bidder, mitigating risk, past performances, certifications and warranties, contract clauses and debriefing the vendors at pre-bid meetings.
  • 2. Breach of Contract – The contract was awarded to this company based on the evaluated bid price and not the actual bid price being the lowest. Are there grounds for termination at this point or would the loss at this point, outweigh the action warranted? Was there a clause in the contract to address this risk?
  • 3. Conflict of Interest – Since the prime contractor and principal subcontractor are the same entity, is there a conflict of interest here?

In conclusion, what we need to look at is the entire contract management process. There were obviously some steps that were not taken or considered. The integrity of the process for bids should never be compromised due to time limits. The result will always be a not-so-favorable outcome for the administration of the contract. I would like to know how this project ended. Did the monies that were to be allocated to the WMBEs reach their destination? Take the potential problems from this scenario and use them in future procurement dealings.

— Gina L. Mobley, CPPB
Buyer Assistant I/II/III
Fairfax County (Va.) Public Schools/OPS


What should you have done? Instead of taking the information provided by the prime contractor at face value, the Director of Procurement should have conducted research into the companies that were offered by all of the prime contractors as WMBE subcontractors. Most states have registries of Certified WMBE contractors and the listing would provide a beginning point for one’s research. If that had been done, the pretense should have been uncovered and the contract awarded to the proper prime contractor.

What can you do now? In the State of Florida, under the circumstances of this “Procurement Ponderable,” the prime contractor would be found in breach of his contract. If that is the case, all payments that exist under the contract may be suspended immediately. If the prime contractor is able to prove that he tried in good faith to follow the terms of the contract and was unable to do so, suspended payments may be paid. If he is unable to prove a good faith attendance to the terms of the contract, “all amounts paid to the contractor or firm under the state contract intended for expenditure with the certified minority business enterprises shall be forfeited and recoverable by the Department of Legal Affairs.” (F.S. 287.094(2)) Also, the contract can be terminated and the prime contractor required to return goods that have been received and funds that have been paid.

What can you do to prevent what happened in this case from happening again? You can begin by following better practices of verification when certifications are required. As stated above, most states provide Certified WMBE registries and by not finding the name of the purported WMBE subcontractor on the registry, one would insist on being provided with a certification. Additionally, in the State of Florida, “Any county, municipality, community college or district school board may set aside up to 10 percent or more of the total amount of funds allocated for the procurement of personal property and services for the purpose of entering into contracts with minority business enterprises.” (F.S. 287.093) This allowance removes the prime contractor from the process and allows the WMBEs to deal directly with the purchasing entities.

— Lysle W. Robinson, FCCM, FCCN
Purchasing Analyst
Department of Management Services
Departmental Purchasing
Tallahassee, Fla.


In response to your December /January 2001 issue ‘Procurement Ponderable,” quite succinctly consider the following:

  • One cannot ever shortcut research and analysis.
  • Use only certified WMBEs. (This requires some level of in-depth sleuthing!)
  • Get informal and formal assessments from colleagues regarding their work and especially note/tag any suspicions anyone may have had about their true status as a WMBE.

I hope this isn’t too simple a response, but the simpler and more direct we are in assessing contractors, the better the outcomes are in the long run. In this instance, determining a vendor’s “true identity” is to many more important than the product. This is fraudulent behavior which may carry serious consequences, therefore forcing some to investigate this vendor’s work history and possibly raise more questions.

— Diane Ward
Director of Program Resource Management
New York City Department of Correction
Programs and Discharge Planning Division


Go Pro welcomes your feedback. Send letters to: publications@nigp.org or Go Pro, 6151 Powers Ferry Road NW, Suite 200, Atlanta GA 30339, Attn.: Bill Wolpin. We reserve the right to edit all letters for clarity, brevity, grammar, punctuation, syntax and style.

Tags: Procurement

Related


  • Will digital transformation of city procurement hold up beyond the pandemic?
    Now is the time for procurement to re-evaluate the free or co-opted tools that enabled service delivery when the pandemic first began and invest in the digital tools that will help streamline RFP evaluation, foster stakeholder collaboration, and maintain compliance during the pandemic and beyond
  • The issue of POs
    A very common term in our field is PO, and by that we mean a purchase order. If we take a look at the official definition from the NIGP Dictionary of Procurement Terms we see the following: A purchaser’s written document to a vendor formalizing all the terms and conditions of a proposed transaction, such […]
  • Heroic: Massachusetts’ procurement response to the pandemic crisis
    Perhaps the most important lesson that a purchasing professional can learn from the Massachusetts experience is that leadership is about celebrating your teammates’ successes rather than your own
  • Demonstrating the value of procurement: A call to action
    Today’s public sector agencies are facing fiscal constraints unlike anything experienced in decades. As a result, agencies are taking a hard look at how taxpayer-generated funds are allocated across the organization and examining the value derived from every organizational unit. The current economic reality is both an opportunity and a call to action to demonstrate […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Certification, your pathway to success
  • Air purifiers can improve indoor air quality as buildings re-open
  • If there were ever a time for procurement to be more strategic, it’s now
  • Resilience matters: The pandemic and procurement

White papers


How a unified HR system helps one public safety organization manage crews, payroll, and more in a single platform

7th January 2021

Your Roadmap to COVID-19 Funding

18th December 2020

The One Where Everyone Wins: A Mutually Beneficial Contracting Method

10th December 2020
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

The latest episode The Young Leaders Podcast focuses on Cyril Jefferson. Cyril is the youngest African American to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Hillsboro, Oregon is pioneering a new #renewableenergy generation technology through a partnership with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

The impact of the #COVID19 pandemic on #telework was swift and profound. Now, the big question is whether – and to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Get ready for the can't-miss webinar on how to kickstart your efficiency improvement plan with Luke Anderson of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Among all states headed into the 2020 general election, which ones have voting populations that are the most demogr… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts in our readership survey to help us shape future content so that we c… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

See how cities different approaches to distribute masks in their communities >> spr.ly/6010GAPLa

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

While #facialrecognition is a powerful tool that can improve law enforcement efficiency, that doesn’t necessarily t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X