https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Procurement


Adapting to lower tax revenues: The TBC model

Adapting to lower tax revenues: The TBC model

The Transitional Benefits Corporation (TBC) model provides several conversion options for government bodies, all while continuing certain services at the current pace of operations.
  • Written by Robert Knauer and Steve Sorett
  • 1st February 2011

The current economic downturn has demonstrated that the tax model used by most government bodies (sales and property tax) cannot continue to provide services for constituents without significant cutbacks, layoffs or downsizing of government operations.

An alternative is the Transitional Benefits Corporation (TBC) model, which provides several conversion options for government bodies, all while continuing certain services at the current pace of operations. The model doesn’t rely on tax revenue per se, to operate, but instead can use different streams of funding.

The TBC method is a vehicle used to promote the transfer of designated, generally underutilized government assets – such as real estate, equipment and intellectual property – to the private sector and to enable associated government employees to be similarly redeployed while allowing them to retain and accrue their public benefits. (Diagram below illustrates the TBC structure.)

The TBC model is predicated upon the willingness of government bodies to be motivated to change and then to do it, given a sound business case, and cost-benefit analysis. TBC is not a blatant outsourcing of government but a menu process that enables government bodies to decide for themselves what they can afford, according to their goals and objectives, and how to achieve it in the most cost-beneficial manner possible, all while serving their citizens.

Organizational and legal precedents, developed successfully in the recent past, support implementation of the innovative TBC method. Federal examples include the Naval Air Warfare Center in Indianapolis, the Navy Environmental Detachment in Charleston, S.C., and the United States Investigative Services (background investigators from the Office of Personnel Management). Some pertinent local government initiatives include the City of Milwaukee’s wastewater management services and the County of San Diego’s information technology (IT) capability.

The TBC method delineates a legal and business framework for transitioning within a non-profit umbrella structure. TBC provides a structured methodology to analyze selected government operations with a view toward enhancing efficiency by reducing costs, redistributing workload and maximizing asset utilization.

Pursuant to the TBC method, an umbrella organization is created to facilitate the smooth transition of public sector assets and personnel to the private sector by attracting financing; incubating new business units and creating spin-offs; and commercializing government-owned intellectual property.

The TBC method is implemented through the contractual interplay under the TBC for the continued performance of the installation’s functions among any existing government installation transferring functions and related personnel, one or more public sector units, and one or more new business units (“NBUs”), and possibly one or more non-profit corporations organized under the auspices of state or local government, consistent with the corporations’ laws of the particular state.

Under the TBC method, the TBC enters into contracts directly with the existing government installations and NBUs to achieve the benefits described below. Note that all of these units are necessary in every case to achieve the benefits set forth below.

About the authors

TBC is designed to be a preferred alternative to outsourcing, managed competitions, privatization, or base closures and departmental shutdowns because of three unique aspects. Because of its uniqueness, the TBC is a patent-pending methodology.

TBC promotes economic development and savings. The TBC method provides for growth opportunities in the communities where the generally underutilized government assets now reside. Government facilities that are potential candidates for closure (e.g. Department of Defense or Department of Energy installation), as well as activities such as laboratories or other active operations that have viable commercial markets are ideally suited for oversight by a TBC. The TBC provides for savings to the government because while the government installation no longer must maintain the assets and the personnel, it continues to have access to them on a contractual basis, thus providing the surge capability mentioned below.

The TBC method also creates potential for economic growth by focusing on the government’s mission while utilizing the former government employees (“Transitional Benefit Employees” or “TBE”) to grow new business opportunities through expanded service offerings. Under the TBC Method, the government will realize economic savings not only in non-recurring costs but also in recurring costs. It is estimated that a typical TBC transaction can be accomplished within six months, with savings being realized shortly thereafter; by contrast, under many other processes, the transaction may take up to four years with savings not recognized until the end of the fifth year. Since the time is compressed to conduct a TBC transaction, the costs are necessarily reduced. In contrast, other processes place significant economic costs on the government.

TBC has surge capability unlike other public-private partnership initiatives. The TBC Method provides the government with the ability to “reach back” on a temporary basis through the TBC and associated contractual arrangements into the nonprofit, private sector, and/or the NBUs to use the assets and TBEs in the event of an emergency or surge in workload. In contrast, under public-private (A-76) competitions, the government may have to reduce its workforce by as much as a third to meet its Most Efficient Organization (MEO) cost reduction goals. By reducing its workforce under an MEO, the government sacrifices mission flexibility in the event of a national security emergency or spike in workload. Under the TBC method, in the event of a national security emergency or spike in workload, the NBUs not only likely will have the full staffing of existing skilled employees capable of performing the required work, these NBUs have the flexibility to rapidly expand their workforce free from the delays caused by government hiring policies and procedures.

The TBC method provides for a “soft landing” for former government employees. Under the TBC, these TBE’s are not only guaranteed a job (most likely for one year) in the private sector organization under the auspices of the TBC, but are also able to retain and continue to accrue government pension, health, and insurance benefits during such period of private employment, which are paid for by the private sector – at a reduction in cost to the government. This agreement is attractive to all of the affected parties: the TBC retains their job and benefits; the government does not need to undergo a reduction in force (RIF) and avoids termination costs and internal disruptions due to workforce restructuring, and the private sector entity gains well-trained, knowledgeable and valuable employees.

The TBC Method is very scalable. It can handle a small group of employees or assets as well as entire installations or activities. It lends itself to involving local governments and economic development-oriented nonprofit organizations as well as universities and foundations. Former government assets and workers are transitioned into productive non-government work while ensuring that legitimate government mission needs are met. Lastly, the TBC Method handles the personnel issues gracefully – providing such TBE’s with a “soft landing” while reducing the cost of personnel transition to the taxpayer.

Robert Knauer, CPCM, CPPO, is the president and founder of the Acquisition Institute Inc., a training and consulting firm involved in federal, state and local government contracting and P3 initiatives. Reach him at acquisitioninstitute@comcast.net or robertkknauer@msn.com.

Steve Sorett, Esq., is partner in the law firm of McKenna, Long & Aldridge LLP (a nationwide firm) specializing in a variety of law functions. He is a specialist in P3 initiative and government contract law, and can be reached at ssorett@mckennalong.com.

Tags: Procurement

Related


  • Heroic: Massachusetts’ procurement response to the pandemic crisis
    Perhaps the most important lesson that a purchasing professional can learn from the Massachusetts experience is that leadership is about celebrating your teammates’ successes rather than your own
  • COVID-19 and energy: The critical need for expert advice
    When the history books are written, the storyline for the chapter on 2020 will be the Great Pandemic and the effects of COVID-19 on the economy, lives, and society in general. A key aspect of this impact on our lives has to do with usage, supply, and cost of energy. While energy usage went down […]
  • Lessons from the pandemic: Emergency sourcing of lifesaving equipment
    Being able to conceive and implement new procurement models in times of crisis requires resourcefulness, tenacity and teamwork.
  • The issue of POs
    A very common term in our field is PO, and by that we mean a purchase order. If we take a look at the official definition from the NIGP Dictionary of Procurement Terms we see the following: A purchaser’s written document to a vendor formalizing all the terms and conditions of a proposed transaction, such […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Demonstrating the value of procurement: A call to action
  • Will digital transformation of city procurement hold up beyond the pandemic?
  • Consolidation and leverage: how to maximize your agency's spend
  • I, Robot?

White papers


How a unified HR system helps one public safety organization manage crews, payroll, and more in a single platform

7th January 2021

Your Roadmap to COVID-19 Funding

18th December 2020

The One Where Everyone Wins: A Mutually Beneficial Contracting Method

10th December 2020
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

The latest episode The Young Leaders Podcast focuses on Cyril Jefferson. Cyril is the youngest African American to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Hillsboro, Oregon is pioneering a new #renewableenergy generation technology through a partnership with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

The impact of the #COVID19 pandemic on #telework was swift and profound. Now, the big question is whether – and to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Get ready for the can't-miss webinar on how to kickstart your efficiency improvement plan with Luke Anderson of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Among all states headed into the 2020 general election, which ones have voting populations that are the most demogr… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts in our readership survey to help us shape future content so that we c… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

See how cities different approaches to distribute masks in their communities >> spr.ly/6010GAPLa

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

While #facialrecognition is a powerful tool that can improve law enforcement efficiency, that doesn’t necessarily t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X