https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Smart Cities & Technology


What’s IT worth?

What’s IT worth?

From Wichita, Kan., to Washington, D.C., governments are pressed to prove the value of their information-technology spending. Their efforts are more difficult
  • Written by Russ LeFevre
  • 1st January 2007

From Wichita, Kan., to Washington, D.C., governments are pressed to prove the value of their information-technology spending. Their efforts are more difficult than those of private companies, where a traditional formula for return on investment (ROI) calculates IT expenses versus dollars generated. Governments do not generate profit, so applying only financial ROI measurements is limiting. Many agencies can measure dollars or hours saved because of new software or hardware, but that is only a fraction of the equation.

In the public sector, ROI measurements must include tangible effects — such as cost savings and improved revenue — as well as social and political effects that are more difficult to gauge — such as political stewardship and quality of life. Often, intangible effects of IT are intricately linked and entwined. For example, social dynamics like improved education, lowered unemployment rates and reduced crime can lead to improved public trust, higher esteem and political capital that can be used to influence policy and legislative action.

The Albany, N.Y.-based Center for Technology in Government (CTG), a research arm of the State University of New York, released a study in September that proposes a new method for measuring public return on investment (PROI). The goal of the study was to develop a universal, non-proprietary method that would help governments track the financial, social and political value of IT investments by demonstrating a link between technology and the effects it has on real-life issues. The results could help justify purchasing IT-related products and services for agencies and governments at all levels.

The method

The proposed PROI method can be applied to virtually any government IT project — from simple Web sites to government-wide information systems. It starts with a high-level view of the IT investment and then drills down to identify the specific measures and methods to document public value.

The strategy is simple in concept: connect what happens in government with the effects of an IT-related purchase on the public, then use the results as an ROI justification of the purchase. A detailed explanation of the method is available online at www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/advancing_roi. The study describes public value of government IT projects based on different effects they can have on residents and businesses, including financial (current or anticipated income, asset values, liabilities, entitlements, and other aspects of wealth); political (personal or corporate influence on government actions or policy, role in political affairs, or influence in political parties or prospects for current or future public office); and social (family or community relationships, social mobility, status and identity).

Expanding the view of stakeholder interests to include those elements brings into focus two distinct but equally important types of public value: delivering benefits directly to residents and enhancing the value of government itself as a public asset. An IT investment that makes government more transparent, more just and a better steward has added public value, which is non-financial but, nonetheless, an important return. The CTG study identifies the ways government IT investments link to public value. The simplest link results from an IT investment that directly improves a service and enhances its value to residents or officials. The total value may be a composite of cost savings, quality and enhanced trust.

Pennsylvania’s public ROI

The CTG study examined five public sector organizations — two U.S. government agencies and three foreign governments — at the federal, state and local levels. All five made IT investments that improved service to the public as well as government operations.

For example, Pennsylvania’s Integrated Enterprise System (IES) launched several initiatives in 1999 to use technology to improve government effectiveness, efficiency and service provision. One of the initiatives was to create an integrated business information system using enterprise resource planning (ERP) software to redesign core business processes for five administrative functions (accounting, budgeting, human resources, payroll and procurement) and to move them from outdated computer systems into the new ERP. The three-year contract for the project’s software and consulting was approximately $51 million, which was included in the 2001 budget. A key goal was to communicate the value of the change to residents.

Between early 2001 and mid-2004, the ERP implementation was completed for 53 agencies, including all 49 agencies under the governor’s jurisdiction, which encompass more than 90,000 employees and more than 150,000 vendor records. The project eventually set the technical infrastructure and enterprise standards for core administrative functions.

The state immediately improved its operations after implementation, and it continues to see improvements. For example, the system has improved collaboration with suppliers and saved on logistics expenses and inventory carrying costs. Additional benefits include a more detailed view of spending, so decision makers can use budgets more efficiently; reduced vendor queries while controlling costs and processing errors; and better accounting of taxpayer dollars, instilling greater public trust in government. The latter of those benefits is the political and social return of the IES project.

Future potential returns may result as the state invests savings on core functions in other services. For example, expected savings of at least $100 million each year from Gov. Rendell’s strategic sourcing initiative, which will depend heavily on the IES, can be spent on early-childhood education, economic development, and health and human services.

Washington’s example

Washington also participated in the study, submitting its digital archives project. Beginning in 2001, the Washington State Digital Archives (WSDA), a program within the Office of Secretary of State, began exploring technologies and techniques for collection, access and preservation of government records. Eventually, it developed a Web site and database that blended the latest technologies with traditional archive theory.

The project called for a $14.5 million joint-use facility, $1.5 million for technology acquisition, $950,000 for software development, and an ongoing budget of $2.1 million per year to create a first-of-its-kind digital records repository that provides online access to Washington’s state and local governments’ electronic records. The archives now include a research room with computer stations, a high-tech presentation classroom and a data center.

From the beginning of the project, Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed and his staff emphasized that the primary value of statewide digital archives was public service. Their vision was to fulfill the state’s record keeping mandate for emerging digital materials, while improving customer service at the local level and enhancing efficiency for the overall system of records preservation and access.

As of May 2006, the WSDA held more than 5.9 million online records, and more than 1,000 searches were conducted on the Web site daily. The WSDA is providing backup storage of public records and long-term preservation of 1 million records from state and local government agencies. Direct returns to the public are evident in greater access to public records, as well as enhanced transparency, accountability and trust in government. Also, there were political returns to Reed and his administration in his election to a second term in 2004.

“Our participation in the CTG project clarified our vision and helped make us think further on continuing to make the public ROI case to each of our stakeholders,” says Adam Jansen, digital archivist for WSDA. “The study makes it clear that governments must focus beyond just the fiscal impact of IT investment and consider the greater societal value that investment creates.”

Gaining traction

State and local governments continue to look for technology that improves services, efficiency and effectiveness. But, IT initiatives require a realistic view of policy, management and technology challenges involved, as well as a compelling vision of the benefits. Governments need the kind of “bottom line” information that could reveal the value of IT investments across all types of programs and help guide new investments.

A growing number of governments are beginning to calculate the PROI for IT projects. In fact, a recent study by the London-based Economist Intelligence Unit found that of 776 government executives polled worldwide, 69 percent expect to measure both financial and social ROI of IT investments in the next five years and will publicize that PROI to residents. With government IT budgets expected to grow only moderately — if at all — over the next five years, the idea of PROI could not come at a better time for agencies or, more importantly, their constituents.

Russ LeFevre is director of solution marketing for Newtown Square, Pa.-based SAP Public Services.

Tags: Smart Cities & Technology

Related


  • Tyler Technologies to acquire NIC
    In a huge government technology deal, Plano, Texas-based Tyler Technologies Inc. and Olathe, Kan.-based NIC Inc. have announced they have entered into an agreement where Tyler will acquire all outstanding shares of NIC in an all-cash transaction valued at approximately $2.3 billion. The terms of the transaction have been unanimously approved by the boards of […]
  • COVID-19 and pivoting into a new year: It may be 2021, but did we really leave 2020?
    As we continue to navigate 2021, many issues will require continued tech leadership and support to carry everyone through
  • AT&T unveils FirstNet innovations, including HPUE, vertical location, deployable offerings
    FirstNet subscribers now can access new technological capabilities that are designed to improve terrestrial LTE coverage, locate first responders, let agencies address coverage gaps quicker during incidents and enable interoperability between FirstNet PTT and LMR users, FirstNet contractor AT&T announced. Although each of these announcements are significant individually by taking significant steps to address known […]
  • Florida county announces successful test of Motorola Solutions’ cloud-based P25 core technology
    A Florida county recently announced the completion of a successful test of Motorola Solutions’ CirrusCentral Core, the cloud-based secondary core for ASTRO 25 P25 systems that is designed to provide redundant reliability to the land-mobile-radio (LMR) network without the costs associated with a physical secondary core site. In Sumter County, Fla., the absence of a […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Bridging the digital divide by fostering digital inclusion and economic recovery
  • Buffalo, N.Y.'s 48 hours to navigate a mission-critical transition to remote work
  • Hi-tech sewers can help safeguard public health, environment and economies
  • Artificial cities could pave the way to driverless adoption

White papers


Discover How Public Sector Officials are Monitoring and Managing Overtime in This New White Paper

22nd February 2021

How to Assemble a Successful Government Grant Proposal

5th February 2021

The Rise of Procurement’s Next Normal

5th February 2021
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

American City & County’s 2020 Exemplary Public Servant of the Year Award dlvr.it/RtZbX2

26th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

American City & County’s 2020 Crown Communities Awards dlvr.it/RtZbVz

26th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities Awards winner: Rock Hill, S.C.’s My Ride dlvr.it/RtZSFp

26th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

Three communities hosting Augmented Reality Developer Challenge competitions dlvr.it/RtZ94D

26th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

Using data to improve emergency response resources dlvr.it/RtVSc0

25th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

How small cities are tackling lead service line replacement dlvr.it/RtV9G8

25th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

COVID-19 and pivoting into a new year: It may be 2021, but did we really leave 2020? dlvr.it/RtQRcr

24th February 2021
AmerCityCounty

Six tips for making sure your dispatch is doing all the right moves dlvr.it/RtQBvl

24th February 2021

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X