https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Administration


Alexander Schimmeck on Unsplash

Article

Addressing facial recognition inequity and access bias in unemployment insurance benefits

Addressing facial recognition inequity and access bias in unemployment insurance benefits

  • Written by Shaun Barry
  • 1st October 2021

Approximately $800 billion in unemployment benefits have been delivered by the federal government since the onset of the pandemic—a staggering figure reflecting how deep and wide the impact of COVID-19 has been on the U.S. workforce.

The pandemic has accelerated the collision course of two inexorably linked forces: the tens of millions of Americans who legitimately file for and desperately need unemployment benefits, and criminals who have seized on the pandemic to commit unemployment insurance (UI) fraud estimated between $89 billion to $400 billion.

The perfect storm swirling around UI has not been lost on The White House and Congress, which is why in August 2021 the U.S. Dept. of Labor (DOL) announced new funding for The American Rescue Plan Act, which provided $2 billion “to prevent and detect fraud, promote equitable access, ensure timely payment of benefits and reduce backlogs.”

With billions of dollars in play and benefits for millions of workers at stake, there is a critical need for government decision-makers to gain a full understanding of key differences between technologies and approaches for ensuring timely and accurate delivery of unemployment benefits, while also combatting UI fraud. They must also understand the implications for “equitable access” so that those most in need get help, without barriers created by technological biases and inequities.

 

Combatting UI fraud: The current tech landscape
Data strongly suggest the two leading identity verification technology approaches to address unemployment insurance fraud and distribution of benefits—facial recognition and data matching—create racial, social and economic inequity and access bias. A biased approval process threatens to disenfranchise citizens who rely most on government benefits. Not to mention the privacy concerns with both approaches. This matters because 60 percent of the $2 billion in DOL funding was allocated to facial recognition and data matching vendors.

Congressional leaders, advocacy groups and others are increasingly raising red flags about using facial recognition for government benefits programs—bipartisan concerns on display at recent House hearings held over the summer by the Judiciary Subcommittee and Financial Service Committee. Attention is focused on a set of core issues with facial recognition and data matching.

Equity issues
For unemployment insurance, facial recognition uses biometric data and official documents to verify the person submitting for and requesting UI benefits is who they say they are. But facial recognition algorithms struggle to accurately identify individuals with darker skin tones, creating benefits distribution equity issues that can unfairly deny or delay payments based on race.

Concerns with the inequities of facial recognition accuracy are not new. A 2019 National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) study found “…that the majority of facial recognition algorithms were far more likely to misidentify racial minorities than whites, with Asians, Blacks and Native Americans particularly at risk.”

Data matching solutions, which have also raised concerns, employ a different approach from facial recognition. They parse through disparate data stored in a data lake to use matching algorithms to validate information. Some rely on credit history-based questions such as type of car owned, previous known addresses, existence of credit and banking history (all requirements that may negatively impact communities of color, young, unbanked, immigrants, etc.) and serve as a further impediment to receiving benefits in a timely manner.

Access issues
Some facial recognition technologies require a person to upload their government-issued ID—which not all populations have. Millions of people in the U.S. do not have a form of government ID. While this does not mean they are not eligible for unemployment in certain states, it does make verifying their identities to gain access to unemployment benefits much more difficult.

Even more problematic is that facial recognition often requires smartphone ownership. Seventy-six percent of U.S. adults earning less than $30,000 a year own a smartphone, which means that roughly one-quarter of the adult population will face hurdles with this aspect of the benefits process.

Privacy issues
According to a report from the Government Accountability Office, Americans are worried about their ability to remain anonymous in public, and the use of the technology that collects and stores their images without their consent. While some federal and state laws regulate companies’ use of this data, there is no comprehensive federal privacy law governing the collection, use and sale of personal information by private-sector companies.

Some facial recognition technologies require additional PII info from UI claimants and these claims use facial recognition capabilities (not to mention that this info can be sold to third parties). While there are policies in place to restrict entities from collecting and using a person’s biometric data, like Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), there is just not enough regulation around the technology at a federal level.

 

A more holistic approach to identity analytics
As of July 2021, 25 states’ unemployment agencies are already using commercial facial recognition software for identity verification of Americans filing for unemployment benefits. Federal agencies are also using the software for identity verification. And for residents in many of these states, use of facial recognition for identity verification is the only option for receiving unemployment benefits—despite equity, access and privacy concerns they might have and a general lack of regulation of the emerging technology.

Before federal, state and local agencies double down on facial recognition for citizen services, there is a critical need to evaluate the value of a more holistic approach that draws on identity analytics from data sources that do not carry the same type of inherent equity and access bias.

Using data to detect identity theft is smart, but the key is picking the right data that minimizes bias. This means tapping solutions that use sources with fewer inherent biases such as digital devices, IP addresses, mobile phone numbers and email addresses. Data-driven identity analytics is key to not only identifying and reducing fraud, but also reducing friction for citizens applying for legitimate UI benefits. The analytics happens instantaneously and behind the scenes, not impeding the user during the application process. Only when something suspicious is indicated would the system introduce obstacles, like having to call a phone number to verify additional information.

This is a far cry from the documented experiences of Americans going through the UI benefits process who have run into identity verification issues with facial recognition. Government agencies should consider technologies that combat fraud and increase efficiencies, and also avoid the pitfalls of bias and inequity that penalize communities who need UI benefits the most.

 

 

Shaun Barry is a renowned expert in fraud and integrity who currently serves as the global lead for government and health care at SAS. Barry has worked globally with governments (central, state/provincial and local levels), health care payers, and other organizations for 25 years to foster innovation and efficiency. He is a frequent speaker at industry events, and he has testified before legislative bodies for numerous governments. Barry also has served on advisory boards that provide citizen oversight to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. 

 

 

Tags: homepage-featured-3 homepage-featured-4 Administration Economy Administration Economy Economy & Finance Article

Most Recent


  • businesses
    Engaging businesses to strengthen your community
    A prosperous business community epitomizes effective city leadership and fuels economic growth. But to fully understand and address specific needs within your community, cities must engage with local stakeholders and businesses to cultivate and maintain a strong business ecosystem. Business engagement plays an essential role in a city’s retention of businesses, helping to foster organic […]
  • Report: Some public employees face financial hardship; comprehensive pay packages proved 'a pathway toward economic security'
    Many who work in public service, in professions that center around helping others, are themselves struggling to make ends meet and face financial hardship. Addressing these needs, the public employers they work for are well positioned to help them out, according to a report published Thursday by the MissionSquare Research Institute, “Examining the Financial Wellbeing […]
  • public health
    How public health can build a “one health” infrastructure for the future
    Public health challenges—like antibiotic resistance, vector-borne disease and a global pandemic—have eluded traditional public health tools and frameworks. As a result, public health leaders focus more and more on the intersection between the environment and human health. Searching for a better framework to understand emerging threats to human health, many in public health circles have […]
  • Phoenix
    Federal funds help fast-growing Arizona city address several infrastructure challenges and needs
    Joe Giudice, public works director for the city of Phoenix, says the influx of new residents is driving a lot of construction in his community. “Phoenix is the fifth largest city in the United States. It is one of the fastest growing cities in a fast-growing region, which influences infrastructure product and service demand. This […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Defending and understanding city and county digital infrastructure—Congress takes a serious look
  • Whistle Blowers Enforce Procurement Ethics

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022

Learn the benefits of transforming and automating your Contract Management process

4th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


These 10 American cities are well prepared for a tech-based future

1st February 2023

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023

10 American cities with a great downtown

24th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Amid spike, federal transportation department launches initiative to curb traffic-related deaths dlvr.it/Shvs31

3rd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Engaging businesses to strengthen your community dlvr.it/ShvZn0

3rd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Some public employees face financial hardship; comprehensive pay packages proved ‘a pathway toward economic… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

2nd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Strategic Budgeting for Modern Government dlvr.it/ShrHmD

2nd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

These 10 American cities are well prepared for a tech-based future dlvr.it/Shp7sH

1st February 2023
AmerCityCounty

How public health can build a “one health” infrastructure for the future dlvr.it/ShnlKm

1st February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Four Steps to Better Municipal Fleet Fuel Purchasing dlvr.it/ShnbWP

1st February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: With increase popularity of e-bikes and e-scooters, there’s a need for ‘safe and connected infrastructure’ dlvr.it/ShlKmJ

31st January 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.