https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Public Works & Utilities


Photo by Utkarsh Agarwal on Unsplash

Case Studies

Navigating energy performance contracts: Lessons learned from the City of Jackson’s $90 million recovery for a failed water meter and billing system

Navigating energy performance contracts: Lessons learned from the City of Jackson’s $90 million recovery for a failed water meter and billing system

  • Written by John Johnson and Brian Boyle
  • 14th August 2020

As city and county governments face revenue shortfalls and budget cuts, many are turning to energy performance or energy savings contracts to update aging infrastructure. These agreements with contractors and service companies promise to finance the capital costs of infrastructure projects with “guaranteed” savings from improved energy efficiency and reduced operating expenses. Unfortunately, these contracts are often based on meaningless guarantees that do not deliver the promised savings.

In theory, such contracts are budget neutral, with the government entity’s capital costs recouped from savings generated by the project. But in practice, such savings may never materialize, leaving the government entity paying off expensive capital projects for years into the future with little or no cost savings.

Jackson, Miss., for example, signed a $90 million energy performance contract with Siemens for a new automated water meter and billing system. The agreement promised $120 million in “guaranteed” savings and increased revenue from the new water system.

Rather than delivering increased revenue and savings, however, the new system cost the city  millions in lost revenue and increased operating costs. New water meters were installed incorrectly or never synced properly with the wireless network. This led to meter reading errors and transmission problems. The electronic billing system dramatically overcharged some residential customers, and it failed to issue any bills at all to some businesses and industrial water users. Despite the city’s efforts to correct the problems, the promised savings and revenue turned into a revenue disaster .

Jackson’s suit 

As the water meter and billing system problems escalated, Jackson faced mounting pressure to take action. Local media coverage featured images of residents who received water bills for thousands of dollars. Other necessary infrastructure projects had to be put on hold, while the city faced looming bond payment deadlines for the new water system.

With the company claiming the problems were caused by the city using the system incorrectly, the city was forced to turn to the legal system.

Lawsuit recovered full cost of project

Jackson engaged legal counsel to evaluate the city’s claims against Siemens. The legal team spent more than six weeks laying the groundwork for a lawsuit, meeting with witnesses and performing a detailed review of the water meter system and the contract.

During their analysis, the city’s legal team discovered several technical deficiencies with the system, which, from the city’s perspective, doomed the project from the start. Despite the promise of increased revenue, the city’s legal team also found significant revenue shortfalls and increased costs of operating the complex new system. The contract itself failed to provide the financial protection contemplated by the governing statute because the guaranteed savings provisions did not reflect reality in the field. In fact, the city’s legal team questioned whether the water meter and billing system was even capable of providing greater energy efficiency and savings.

Based on these findings, Jackson filed a lawsuit. Among other things, the suit contended that the supposedly “guaranteed” savings were not possible and, as a result, the contract should be partially invalidated for its failure to comply with statutory requirements for energy performance contracts.

Six months after the city filed suit, the company agreed to settle for the full value of the contract. In addition to paying $89.8 million, the city was permitted to retain another $25 million in improvements to its wastewater treatment system completed as part of the project.

What cities and counties should consider before signing energy performance contracts

For the cities and counties across the country turning to energy performance contracts to update aging infrastructure,  Jackson’s fight may provide some helpful lessons. Some tips for government officials considering such contracts include:

  • Avoid unnecessary scope items. Contractors may push to include items in the scope of work that are not priorities for the government entity. Be wary of expanding the project’s scope based on the contractor’s promise that the work will pay for itself.
  • Scrutinize “guaranteed savings” provisions. Guaranteed savings often have multiple components, including reduced energy and maintenance costs. However, the contract may not truly guarantee the recoupment of the specified dollar amounts. For example, certain savings may be “stipulated” in the contract. If those savings fail to materialize following the project, the government entity bears the burden of the shortfall. Benchmarks used to measure energy savings also may be skewed in favor of the contractor.
  • Beware of water meter system upgrades. Contracts to install new automated water meter systems often fail to guarantee actual savings or revenue. For these projects, the contractor may guarantee that an individual meter will accurately measure water consumption when tested in a lab. However, collecting revenue from water usage requires the transmission of accurate meter readings over the wireless network to the billing system. Without guaranteeing performance of the system as a whole, there is no real guarantee of revenue or “savings” of any kind.
  • Make the contractor pay for third-party verification. Ongoing measurement and verification of savings is critical for energy performance contracts. Rather than allowing a contractor to measure its own performance over a period of years, government entities should consider requiring the contractor to pay for independent testing of the project improvements to ensure savings are being realized.

No infrastructure project is immune to problems. However, when it comes to energy performance contracts, cities and counties should be wary of “guaranteed” projects that sound too good to be true.

John M. Johnson is a partner with Lightfoot, Franklin & White LLC in Birmingham, Ala. Brian C. Boyle is a partner with Lightfoot, Franklin & White LLC in Houston, Texas. They represented the City of Jackson in its lawsuit.

Tags: News Public Works & Utilities News Public Works & Utilities Case Studies

Most Recent


  • Smart911 emergency profiles provide first responders with more information, faster
    Since the first full time fire department was established in Cincinnati in 1853, emergency responders have raced into unknown scenarios with limited advance information when the firehouse bell rings—until now. Among the many advancements of next-generation 911 dispatch systems, Smart911, an app developed by Rave Mobile Safety, automatically displays resident profiles during an emergency—including details […]
  • MSPs
    The MSP downstream cyberthreat paradox: Understanding the city and county connection
    Recently the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) along with the FBI, NSA, and international cyber authorities issued a cybersecurity advisory aimed at protecting managed service providers (MSPs) and their customers. This high-level advisory has been gestating for some time ever since the SolarWinds and Kaseya supply chain cyber-attacks. A software supply chain attack occurs […]
  • Philanthropic group to launch assistance portal for local admins navigating federal bureaucracy
    A joint venture announced Tuesday by a group of philanthropic organizations—in collaboration with the U.S. Conference of Mayors, the National League of Cities (NLC) and Results for America—seeks to help small and mid-sized communities secure their piece of the $550 billion in funding available for local governments navigating federal bureaucracy. The digital portal will launch […]
  • Report: Nearly 95 percent of America's mayors face harassment, threats and violence
    In today’s divided socioeconomic landscape—one that’s rife with political angst—harassment of mayors has become commonplace, especially against minority leaders. Women mayors and mayors of color face more frequent and acute incidents of harassment and violence, according to new research from the advocacy organizations Equity Agenda and the Mayors Innovation Project. Nearly half of all women mayors […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • NLC releases State of Cities 2021 report
  • How local governments can get ahead of the infrastructure wave: Strategies to mitigate risk
  • Prioritizing rapid restore leads to stronger ransomware attack recovery
  • Ultrafast electric vehicle charging will propel local governments into the future

White papers


Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022

Sixth-Largest US School District Saves Over $500,000 by Utilizing a Cooperative

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Amid digital evolution, equity in accessibility is of utmost importance dlvr.it/SQwZ3b

23rd May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters dlvr.it/SQwL8f

23rd May 2022
AmerCityCounty

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program dlvr.it/SQwJRj

23rd May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Sixth-Largest US School District Saves Over $500,000 by Utilizing a Cooperative dlvr.it/SQwHPv

23rd May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid shifting workplace expectations, local government employers must adapt dlvr.it/SQm2RT

20th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Smart911 emergency profiles provide first responders with more information, faster dlvr.it/SQh9gl

19th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Minor league baseball is helping cities hit a revitalization home run dlvr.it/SQc5N4

18th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Sustainable Purchasing Leadership Council can help governments get up to speed on sustainable buys dlvr.it/SQbwqL

18th May 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X