https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Public Works & Utilities


Photo by Utkarsh Agarwal on Unsplash

Case Studies

Navigating energy performance contracts: Lessons learned from the City of Jackson’s $90 million recovery for a failed water meter and billing system

Navigating energy performance contracts: Lessons learned from the City of Jackson’s $90 million recovery for a failed water meter and billing system

  • Written by John Johnson and Brian Boyle
  • 14th August 2020

As city and county governments face revenue shortfalls and budget cuts, many are turning to energy performance or energy savings contracts to update aging infrastructure. These agreements with contractors and service companies promise to finance the capital costs of infrastructure projects with “guaranteed” savings from improved energy efficiency and reduced operating expenses. Unfortunately, these contracts are often based on meaningless guarantees that do not deliver the promised savings.

In theory, such contracts are budget neutral, with the government entity’s capital costs recouped from savings generated by the project. But in practice, such savings may never materialize, leaving the government entity paying off expensive capital projects for years into the future with little or no cost savings.

Jackson, Miss., for example, signed a $90 million energy performance contract with Siemens for a new automated water meter and billing system. The agreement promised $120 million in “guaranteed” savings and increased revenue from the new water system.

Rather than delivering increased revenue and savings, however, the new system cost the city  millions in lost revenue and increased operating costs. New water meters were installed incorrectly or never synced properly with the wireless network. This led to meter reading errors and transmission problems. The electronic billing system dramatically overcharged some residential customers, and it failed to issue any bills at all to some businesses and industrial water users. Despite the city’s efforts to correct the problems, the promised savings and revenue turned into a revenue disaster .

Jackson’s suit 

As the water meter and billing system problems escalated, Jackson faced mounting pressure to take action. Local media coverage featured images of residents who received water bills for thousands of dollars. Other necessary infrastructure projects had to be put on hold, while the city faced looming bond payment deadlines for the new water system.

With the company claiming the problems were caused by the city using the system incorrectly, the city was forced to turn to the legal system.

Lawsuit recovered full cost of project

Jackson engaged legal counsel to evaluate the city’s claims against Siemens. The legal team spent more than six weeks laying the groundwork for a lawsuit, meeting with witnesses and performing a detailed review of the water meter system and the contract.

During their analysis, the city’s legal team discovered several technical deficiencies with the system, which, from the city’s perspective, doomed the project from the start. Despite the promise of increased revenue, the city’s legal team also found significant revenue shortfalls and increased costs of operating the complex new system. The contract itself failed to provide the financial protection contemplated by the governing statute because the guaranteed savings provisions did not reflect reality in the field. In fact, the city’s legal team questioned whether the water meter and billing system was even capable of providing greater energy efficiency and savings.

Based on these findings, Jackson filed a lawsuit. Among other things, the suit contended that the supposedly “guaranteed” savings were not possible and, as a result, the contract should be partially invalidated for its failure to comply with statutory requirements for energy performance contracts.

Six months after the city filed suit, the company agreed to settle for the full value of the contract. In addition to paying $89.8 million, the city was permitted to retain another $25 million in improvements to its wastewater treatment system completed as part of the project.

What cities and counties should consider before signing energy performance contracts

For the cities and counties across the country turning to energy performance contracts to update aging infrastructure,  Jackson’s fight may provide some helpful lessons. Some tips for government officials considering such contracts include:

  • Avoid unnecessary scope items. Contractors may push to include items in the scope of work that are not priorities for the government entity. Be wary of expanding the project’s scope based on the contractor’s promise that the work will pay for itself.
  • Scrutinize “guaranteed savings” provisions. Guaranteed savings often have multiple components, including reduced energy and maintenance costs. However, the contract may not truly guarantee the recoupment of the specified dollar amounts. For example, certain savings may be “stipulated” in the contract. If those savings fail to materialize following the project, the government entity bears the burden of the shortfall. Benchmarks used to measure energy savings also may be skewed in favor of the contractor.
  • Beware of water meter system upgrades. Contracts to install new automated water meter systems often fail to guarantee actual savings or revenue. For these projects, the contractor may guarantee that an individual meter will accurately measure water consumption when tested in a lab. However, collecting revenue from water usage requires the transmission of accurate meter readings over the wireless network to the billing system. Without guaranteeing performance of the system as a whole, there is no real guarantee of revenue or “savings” of any kind.
  • Make the contractor pay for third-party verification. Ongoing measurement and verification of savings is critical for energy performance contracts. Rather than allowing a contractor to measure its own performance over a period of years, government entities should consider requiring the contractor to pay for independent testing of the project improvements to ensure savings are being realized.

No infrastructure project is immune to problems. However, when it comes to energy performance contracts, cities and counties should be wary of “guaranteed” projects that sound too good to be true.

John M. Johnson is a partner with Lightfoot, Franklin & White LLC in Birmingham, Ala. Brian C. Boyle is a partner with Lightfoot, Franklin & White LLC in Houston, Texas. They represented the City of Jackson in its lawsuit.

Tags: News Public Works & Utilities News Public Works & Utilities Case Studies

Most Recent


  • sustainability
    Residents ask government leaders to show measurable sustainability results and triumphs
    There’s a growing urgency for cities and counties to go green, says Sol Salinas, executive vice president, sustainability lead at Capgemini Americas, a service-based company that provides consulting, digital transformation and outsourcing services to many organizations, including government agencies. It partners with organizations to transform and manage their operations by harnessing the power of technology. […]
  • Amid spike, federal transportation department launches initiative to curb traffic-related deaths
    While stay-at-home orders might be a thing of the past, the pandemic’s impact is still felt daily through expectations to socially distance, the prevalence of masks in high risk areas like hospitals, and the stubbornly high annual rate of traffic-related deaths. Traffic fatalities hit a 16-year high in 2021, and preliminary data points to a […]
  • Report: Some public employees face financial hardship; comprehensive pay packages proved 'a pathway toward economic security'
    Many who work in public service, in professions that center around helping others, are themselves struggling to make ends meet and face financial hardship. Addressing these needs, the public employers they work for are well positioned to help them out, according to a report published Thursday by the MissionSquare Research Institute, “Examining the Financial Wellbeing […]
  • These 10 American cities are well prepared for a tech-based future
    From smart devices to electric vehicles, the success of technological advancements rely on municipal grids and infrastructure. Some cities are better equipped for the future than others. A new analysis from the tech company ProptechOS ranks the top 10 American cities best positioned for a “smart city future.” “But new technologies can only support us […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • NLC releases State of Cities 2021 report
  • How local governments can get ahead of the infrastructure wave: Strategies to mitigate risk
  • Prioritizing rapid restore leads to stronger ransomware attack recovery
  • Ultrafast electric vehicle charging will propel local governments into the future

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


Future-proof Your State and Local Government Finance: 5 Key Trends for 2023

6th February 2023

How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


These 10 American cities are well prepared for a tech-based future

1st February 2023

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023

10 American cities with a great downtown

24th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Residents ask government leaders to show measurable sustainability results and triumphs dlvr.it/Sj1znw

6th February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Future-proof Your State and Local Government Finance: 5 Key Trends for 2023 dlvr.it/Sj1KxB

6th February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Amid spike, federal transportation department launches initiative to curb traffic-related deaths dlvr.it/Shvs31

3rd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Engaging businesses to strengthen your community dlvr.it/ShvZn0

3rd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Some public employees face financial hardship; comprehensive pay packages proved ‘a pathway toward economic… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

2nd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Strategic Budgeting for Modern Government dlvr.it/ShrHmD

2nd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

These 10 American cities are well prepared for a tech-based future dlvr.it/Shp7sH

1st February 2023
AmerCityCounty

How public health can build a “one health” infrastructure for the future dlvr.it/ShnlKm

1st February 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.