https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Public Works & Utilities


Dialing back energy use

Dialing back energy use

5 steps to plan energy management programs that show results.
  • Written by Jay Sheehan and David Bouffard
  • 1st December 2009

Keeping energy costs under control is a huge challenge for local governments nationwide, and as concern about global climate change increases, a growing number of communities are using energy management plans to attack both issues. Energy use and energy costs are tightly intertwined, making it possible for local governments to be both fiscally and environmentally responsible through proper management.

How much energy a local government uses affects both its costs and how much greenhouse gas (GHG) it emits. Every unit of energy has a related quantity of GHG emissions; the more energy used, the more emissions created.

However, the efficient use of energy is not the be-all, end-all of sustainability or energy management. Renewable energy — like solar, wind and emerging technologies — has an important role to play. Reducing employee commuting and travel also can help local governments reduce their environmental impacts. A comprehensive energy and sustainability program will include elements of all three, but will do so in a way that maximizes benefits and minimizes costs. It also will extend through all levels of the local government, from policy makers to public works departments to the treasurers’ offices to facilities staff. That does not usually mean big changes or greatly increased workload for employees, because small changes add up to big results.

The key to a successful energy management program is the quality of the planning behind it. The following five steps are designed to help local governments plan strategies to reduce their energy use and energy bills.

  • 1. MAKE A COMMITMENT

    More than 1,000 mayors have signed the Washington-based U.S. Conference of Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement, pledging to work toward meeting the carbon emissions reduction targets set out in the Kyoto Protocol. There are many other international, national, state and regional initiatives that municipalities can join to show commitment, as well. Vocal support from policy makers, such as mayors, councilors, selectmen and municipal managers, is usually enough to build on. It also helps to set up a committee or working group, which can include government officials and community members, to guide the planning effort and implementation.

  • 2. DEFINE BOUNDARIES

    The group’s first step should be to define a boundary that describes what the plan will cover and what it will take responsibility for. It is best to start with the aspects of a community’s emissions that the local government controls, such as government and community facility heat and electricity, vehicle fleets and streetlights — in short, the energy use that the city or county pays for directly. In the long run, communities will have the greatest positive effect and generate the largest emissions reductions by helping residents reduce their home energy use, but it is a good idea to start small and build over time.

  • 3. DETERMINE YOUR BASELINE

    With a boundary established, the next step is to determine the energy use and emissions within that boundary for a chosen year, which will act as the baseline for goal setting and measuring progress. The simplest way to do that is by using utility and fuel bills. Those documents have all the necessary quantity and cost data to calculate emissions by source.

    Knoxville, Tenn., chose 2005 as its baseline year and compiled energy use and cost data for its buildings, fleets, streetlights, waste stream, and employee commuting, which many municipalities include in emissions despite the fact that they do not pay for it. Knoxville found that its energy use accounted for nearly 80,000 tons of equivalent carbon dioxide emissions (eCO2, the units used to measure GHG emissions), with one-third attributable to buildings alone. Its energy costs for the year were nearly $8 million.

  • 4. SET GOALS

    The baseline calculations provide the framework for setting realistic, achievable goals. Goals should take the form of a percentage of emissions reduction below the baseline year.

  • 5. CHOOSE PROJECTS

    The next step is the most exciting and potentially the most complex: choosing which projects to pursue. The options will vary based on geography, demographics and population, among other factors. It is important to pick projects that make both financial and environmental sense.

    Saco, Maine, chose to pursue both a highly visible wind power project and less flashy efficiency measures, such as replacing incandescent light bulbs with compact fluorescents, replacing inefficient appliances in city buildings, and upgrading to LCD computer monitors. The efficiency improvements yielded a net annual savings of more than $13,000 and about 60 tons of eCO2, and the wind turbine provides power to city buildings. The turbine also has become a symbol of Saco’s commitment and a source of civic pride.

Any plan should consider how to access funding opportunities, because they often are the difference between pursuing a project and shelving it. “We want to create a lasting investment instead of just spending our money,” says Meg Parulis, town planner in Westbrook, Conn., where First Selectman Noel Bishop led an initiative to leverage grant money into an energy management plan. “There are so many possibilities out there — programs we can participate in, grants we can pursue. It’s hard to sort through it all. However, if we do the analysis, create a plan, and set priorities, we can pick projects that work for us and pursue grant money to implement them.”

Many communities also build outreach and education programs into their plans. Miami, for example, lays out educational aspects for each initiative it describes in its 2008 climate action plan. That includes promoting alternative commuting, providing energy efficiency information to residents, and publicizing available tax incentives for energy efficiency and renewable energy generation.

PLANNING PAYS OFF

It is tempting to jump right into capital energy projects and initiatives, but that is risky. Installing a community wind turbine is a highly visible project, but does it offer both a financial or environmental return? Upgrading the boiler in a building might seem like an obvious choice, but could that money be better spent elsewhere?

Having a plan in place that is built on a solid foundation of data and analysis can answer those questions definitively and provide a clear benchmark against which to measure the success of any projects or initiatives. “Alternative energy projects are great if they make sense, and that’s the hard part,” Parulis says. “We’re not going to do it just to be ‘green.’ It has to be practical. It has to be pragmatic. Planning gives us the information we need to make good decisions.”

Jay Sheehan is senior vice president, and David Bouffard is a project engineer for Portland, Maine-based Woodard & Curran.

Recap

Step 1: Make a commitment to reduce energy use and GHG emissions. Establish a committee, working group, or task force.

Step 2: Define your boundaries. What will your plan cover?

Step 3: Determine your baseline. How much energy do you use, and what are your current emissions?

Step 4: Set goals. Be realistic but ambitious.

Step 5: Chose projects that fit your goals. Start with easy-to-implement projects with shorter payback, and consider all funding opportunities.

Tags: Public Works & Utilities Smart Cities & Technology

Most Recent


  • MSPs
    The MSP downstream cyberthreat paradox: Understanding the city and county connection
    Recently the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) along with the FBI, NSA, and international cyber authorities issued a cybersecurity advisory aimed at protecting managed service providers (MSPs) and their customers. This high-level advisory has been gestating for some time ever since the SolarWinds and Kaseya supply chain cyber-attacks. A software supply chain attack occurs […]
  • As ransomware threat increases, a shift in minimum cyber insurance standards is hardening digital defenses
    In the last decade, the threat of ransomware and other cyberactivity has increased dramatically—more than ever, targeted organizations are paying the criminal perpetrators to have their information restored.  “Over the last year there has been an almost threefold increase in the proportion of victims paying ransoms of $1 million or more: up from 4 percent in 2020 […]
  • EV chargers
    Cities steadily adding more EV chargers for public to use
    Local governments are making headway as they develop their electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure. “Progress varies depending on what stage governments are at in the electrification strategy and funding availability,” says Brandon Branham, assistant city manager and chief technology officer for Peachtree Corners, Ga., which is part of the Atlanta metro. Its 2022 population is estimated […]
  • Four years after Hurricane Michael, Panama City, Fla. is replanting, rebuilding
    It’s been nearly four years since Hurricane Michael ripped through Florida’s panhandle, leaving a trail of destruction in its wake that’s still being felt.   “We lost 80 percent of our trees,” said Greg Brudnicki, mayor of Panama City, a municipality of around 30,000 people on Florida’s panhandle. He estimated the number of trees the […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • How local governments can get ahead of the infrastructure wave: Strategies to mitigate risk
  • Prioritizing rapid restore leads to stronger ransomware attack recovery
  • Ultrafast electric vehicle charging will propel local governments into the future
  • The Colonial Pipeline attack: What it means for critical infrastructure, and why businesses need to have a plan in place

White papers


The PIO’s Ultimate Guide to Social Media

16th May 2022

Gain Greater Visibility Into Your Public Works Fleet

16th May 2022

Arizona Arts Center Meets Rapid Deadline with Hundreds of Thousands in Savings

26th April 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Minor league baseball is helping cities hit a revitalization home run dlvr.it/SQc5N4

18th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Sustainable Purchasing Leadership Council can help governments get up to speed on sustainable buys dlvr.it/SQbwqL

18th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

The MSP downstream cyberthreat paradox: Understanding the city and county connection dlvr.it/SQYVjs

17th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Philanthropic group to launch assistance portal for local admins navigating federal bureaucracy dlvr.it/SQY16G

17th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Report: Nearly 95 percent of America’s mayors face harassment, threats and violence dlvr.it/SQTn2z

16th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

The PIO’s Ultimate Guide to Social Media dlvr.it/SQTdCK

16th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Gain Greater Visibility Into Your Public Works Fleet dlvr.it/SQSqXG

16th May 2022
AmerCityCounty

Report: Almost half of public sector retirees don’t touch their retirement plans for a decade dlvr.it/SQKMjp

13th May 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X