https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

issue_20070101


Tobacco Money–Hard Habit for States to Kick

Tobacco Money–Hard Habit for States to Kick

By Pamela M. Prah, Stateline.org Staff Writer States are discovering just how addictive tobacco can be. While a number are looking to hike the price of
  • Written by American City & County Administrator
  • 9th February 2007

By Pamela M. Prah, Stateline.org Staff Writer

States are discovering just how addictive tobacco can be. While a number are looking to hike the price of a pack of cigarettes to dissuade people from lighting up, states hooked on big money from Big Tobacco might be facing some withdrawal pains themselves.

As they begin drafting their budgets for fiscal 2008, many states are facing a shortfall in the tobacco settlement dollars they have used in recent years to balance budgets and bolster health programs. In exchange for agreeing not to sue cigarette manufacturers over health claims, states have received $53 million between 2000-2005 as part of the 1998 multi-state settlement.

Now, states are taking Big Tobacco back to court, claiming they were shortchanged $813 million in 2006. States are wary they could be stiffed $1 billion this year when payments are due April 15. The cigarette companies say the tobacco settlement allows them to pare back their payments under certain conditions, including loss of business to cigarette makers that haven’t signed on to the pact.

“This is the most important dispute between the states and the tobacco companies since the master settlement was signed in 1998,” said Washington state Attorney General Rob McKeena, who co-chairs the tobacco committee at the National Association of Attorneys General , the umbrella organization that spearheaded the litigation for the states. McKenna said he doubts the litigation will be resolved by the end of the year.

While the two sides duke it out, many states learned their lesson last year and already are bracing for a smaller tobacco windfall this year. Virginia, for example, received $21 million less than expected last year and had to reshuffle money to make sure the state Medicaid program wasn’t cut, according to Ric Brown, director of the commonwealth’s Department of Planning and Budget. While optimistic states eventually will win the legal wrangling, he said he’s not banking on the money this year. “We can’t spend it until we get it.”

Alabama last year found it was short nearly $11 million, forcing cuts in the Children’s First Trust Fund , which provides grants to local children’s programs, said Deborah Kennedy, assistant director of the state’s Legislative Fiscal Office. Oregon received $9 million less than expected and had to reduce payments to human services programs.

“This is definitely an issue because states were beginning to rely on this source of revenue for a range of different projects and the shortfall will now force them to re-align their priorities,” said Sujit CanagaRetna, a state budget expert for the Council of State Governments .

Forty-six states are part of the original master tobacco settlement. Payments are based on how many cigarettes the tobacco companies sell in each state. (Four states — Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi and Texas — have their own agreements). States can use the money to fund anti-smoking and health care programs, but the master settlement doesn’t require it and most don’t. During recent lean years, many cash-strapped states used their tobacco money to balance their budgets.

“Instead of using the money for its intended purpose, the states have squandered billions of dollars on ‘pet projects,’ such as golf courses and horse-breeding farms, roads and bridges, and state budget-deficit reductions – items completely unrelated to the stated purpose of the settlement funds,” R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. said on its Web site. The site includes a state-by-state tally of tobacco taxes and settlement payments in 2005.

Eric Lindblom of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids also faulted states for not spending more to reduce smoking. Only Maine, Delaware and Colorado fund tobacco-use prevention programs at levels the federal government suggests. The group says Mississippi used to be a national leader on this issue but “has fallen to dead last.” It blames Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour (R), a former tobacco lobbyist. The group’s recent report includes estimates of tobacco-use prevention spending for each state.

Arizona was the only state in 2005 to use all of its tobacco money for health issues, according to an April 2006 report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office , the congressional watchdog agency of Congress. The report includes a state-by-state listing of how states spent their tobacco money in 2005.

Of $5.8 billion received in 2005, s tates set aside only about one-third for health and less than 5 percent for tobacco-control programs, according to the 2006 GAO report.

Fifteen states — including California, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, South Carolina and Wisconsin– already have cashed in a big chunk of their share of the settlement, selling future tobacco payments to investors for an upfront lump-sum payment, known as securitization.

Some states are having second thoughts on how they have spent their tobacco funds. Wisconsin Gov. Jim Doyle (D) hopes to undo his state’s securitization deal and refinance the bonds, with the money then being used to expand anti-smoking initiatives. A Colorado Senate panel recently approved a bill directing some of the state’s tobacco settlement money to health programs. During the economic downturn, the state used about $20 million of the settlement for highway projects, The Rocky Mountain News reported.

Voters recently also had their say on how to spend the tobacco settlement. Last November, Florida and Idaho voters adopted measures requiring that 15 percent to 20 percent of their tobacco settlement be used for statewide tobacco education and prevention programs.

The original 1998 tobacco settlement involved four major tobacco companies: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard, and Philip Morris USA, whose parent company recently changed its name to Altria Group. The settlement led 46 states to drop a massive lawsuit against cigarette companies in exchange for sharing an estimated $206 billion over 25 years. Phillip Morris made its full payment to the states last year, but won’t say whether it will do the same this year.

2007 proposals for per-pack cigarette tax hikes:

  • Connecticut – 49-cent increase by Gov. M. Jodi Rell (R) to pay for health insurance programs
  • Delaware – 45-cent hike by Gov. Ruth Ann Minner (D) for programs to reduce infant mortality and improve children’s health
  • Indiana – 25-cent hike by Gov. Mitch Daniels (R) to fund health insurance coverage and anti-smoking programs
  • Iowa – $1 increase by Gov. Chet Culver (D) to curb smoking and provide health insurance to needy children
  • Maine – $1 hike by Gov. John Baldacci (D) to patch a hole in the budget
  • Maryland – $1 increase by Delegate Peter Hammen (D) to provide health insurance to low-income workers and subsidies to small businesses that offer coverage
  • Mississippi – $1 increase by Lt. Gov. Amy Tuck (R) to cut nearly in half the 7 percent state sales tax on groceries
  • Oregon – 84.5-cent increase by Gov. Ted Kulongoski (D) to provide health insurance to uninsured children
  • Pennsylvania – 10 cent increase on cigarettes and a new 36-cent tax on cigars and smokeless tobacco by Gov. Ed Rendell’s (D) to help cover those without health insurance
  • South Carolina – 30-cent increase by Gov. Mark Sanford (R) to offset a proposed cut in state income tax
  • Tennessee – 40-cent increase by Gov. Phil Bredesen (D) for education programs
  • Wisconsin – $1.25 increase by Gov. Jim Doyle (D) to pay for anti-smoking efforts and to offset the cost of tobacco-related illnesses

Source: Stateline.org. For an interactive

Tags: ar issue_20070101 mag

Most Recent


  • What’s my truck worth?
    Truck Value VIN Decoding & Make/Year/Model Lookup
  • Tobacco Money–Hard Habit for States to Kick
    Calendar of events
    A list of NIGP courses, conferences and webinars for NIGP members held in December 2012 and January 2013.
  • Tobacco Money–Hard Habit for States to Kick
    UPPCC new certifications
    The Universal Public Purchasing Certification Council announces that 208 individuals successfully completed the spring 2012 UPPCC certification examinations administered in May 2012.
  • Tobacco Money–Hard Habit for States to Kick
    Performance data on the latest certification exams
    The UPPCC has released key performance data from the May 2012 examinations.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Tobacco Money–Hard Habit for States to Kick
    Number of contracting professionals on the rise
  • Tobacco Money–Hard Habit for States to Kick
    FBI employee sentenced to probation for accepting cruise
  • Tobacco Money–Hard Habit for States to Kick
    GSA names Brasseux deputy administrator
  • Tobacco Money–Hard Habit for States to Kick
    Auction delivers two-year power pact to Texas community

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022

Learn the benefits of transforming and automating your Contract Management process

4th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023

10 American cities with a great downtown

24th January 2023

Miami leads the way in FT-Nikkei ranking of best U.S. cities for foreign companies

20th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient dlvr.it/ShYNcx

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Shifting city demographics present an opportunity to build coalitions, address inequality dlvr.it/ShYMMm

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Spending American Rescue Plan Act funds: A primer for municipalities dlvr.it/ShXzvl

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand dlvr.it/ShVhBW

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Managing landslides along road corridors using remote sensing dlvr.it/ShTpL6

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Prioritizing neighborhood infill, expanding transit options increases neighborhood resilience dlvr.it/ShRrFM

25th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

10 American cities with a great downtown dlvr.it/ShNxXH

24th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

With a few strategies and tools, public procurement directors can recruit new, diverse staffers dlvr.it/ShNnj4

24th January 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.