https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

issue_20050101


In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?

In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?

In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature? By Aaron Gould Sheinin If the continental United States were under attack, an obscure state law passed
  • Written by American City & County Administrator
  • 1st March 2005

In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?

By Aaron Gould Sheinin

If the continental United States were under attack, an obscure state law passed in 1962 would allow South Carolina legislators to call on pre-selected individuals to carry on with duties in the General Assembly in the event of the death or incapacitation of the elected officials.

At least four other states passed similar succession laws: Delaware in 1953, Louisiana in 1963 and Texas in 1985. Maine passed a law in 1961 but repealed it 16 years later.

But theres one major problem evident in South Carolina. No one now serving in the General Assembly has submitted the necessary list of emergency successors. Until this year, only one incumbent was even aware of the law. And theres a serious question about the statutes legality, according to experts on constitutional matters.

The “Emergency Interim Legislative Succession Act” requires each lawmaker to name three to seven people, any of whom could fill in if the elected lawmaker became a casualty of hostilities and so was unable to tend to legislative duties. The successors must be qualified to assume the duties, meaning he or she must live in the lawmakers district, be eligible to vote and be at least 21 years old for a House seat, and 25 for a Senate seat. There are no requirements as to political party or ideology.

The successor law does not apply to statewide constitutional officers, such as governor or lieutenant governor. The gubernatorial line of succession goes from governor to lieutenant governor to president pro tem of the Senate to speaker of the House. If all four are unable to serve, then the General Assembly elects a new governor.

The law requires each legislator to file the list of possible successors with the South Carolina secretary of state. None has done so.

It may be just as well that the solons are scofflaws. University of South Carolina law professor Eldon Wedlock said he cannot imagine the successor statute would survive scrutiny by the courts. He and South Carolina Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston, who is considered to be an expert on state law and procedure, say the law is probably unconstitutional because the state Constitution bestows the powers of an office only to the person elected.

South Carolinas little-known legislative succession law dates back to the darkest days of the Cold War, when tensions between the United States and the old Soviet Union posed a near-constant threat of nuclear war.

Most lawmakers assume the law had been passed amid fears of a growing Communist threat in Cuba and worldwide nuclear proliferation during the Cold War.

“This was (during) crazy times. You just don’t know,” said state Rep. John Graham Altman, a Republican who represents a Charleston district. When the succession law was passed in 1962, Altman was press secretary to then-Gov. Fritz Hollings, who retired from the U.S. Senate this year.

“We were crazy over fallout shelters,” he said.

In the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, there are renewed fears of attack and concerns about the continuity of government, giving such laws new relevance.

Security changes in the wake of 9/11 have been serious. Several entrances and exits to the parking garage underneath the South Carolina Statehouse have been closed permanently. Guards monitor the entrances that remain open, to check cars for parking stickers. Legislators, staff and media are required to wear identification badges, although few lawmakers actually do so.

Despite the need for new security precautions, some legislators say theyd have a hard time putting together a list of people who could step into their shoes if necessary. “I don’t know anybody who’d want the job, Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, a Democrat from rural Orangeburg, joked.

Sen. John Hawkins, a Republican from the Piedmont industrial hub of Spartanburg, called the succession law “an anachronism” and said that he rejects the “post-9/11 bunker mentality.

This nation is going to be safer. We can take ourselves a little too seriously down here,” Hawkins said.

Source: Stateline.org.

Tags: ar issue_20050101 mag

Most Recent


  • What’s my truck worth?
    Truck Value VIN Decoding & Make/Year/Model Lookup
  • In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?
    Calendar of events
    A list of NIGP courses, conferences and webinars for NIGP members held in December 2012 and January 2013.
  • In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?
    UPPCC new certifications
    The Universal Public Purchasing Certification Council announces that 208 individuals successfully completed the spring 2012 UPPCC certification examinations administered in May 2012.
  • In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?
    Performance data on the latest certification exams
    The UPPCC has released key performance data from the May 2012 examinations.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?
    xxxNEWS OF THE WEIRDxxx
  • In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?
    xxxNEWS OF THE WEIRDxxx
  • In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?
    xxxNEWS OF THE WEIRDxxx
  • In Case of Attack, Who Would Run the Legislature?
    xxxNEWS OF THE WEIRDxxx

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022

Learn the benefits of transforming and automating your Contract Management process

4th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023

10 American cities with a great downtown

24th January 2023

Miami leads the way in FT-Nikkei ranking of best U.S. cities for foreign companies

20th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient dlvr.it/ShYNcx

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Shifting city demographics present an opportunity to build coalitions, address inequality dlvr.it/ShYMMm

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Spending American Rescue Plan Act funds: A primer for municipalities dlvr.it/ShXzvl

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand dlvr.it/ShVhBW

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Managing landslides along road corridors using remote sensing dlvr.it/ShTpL6

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Prioritizing neighborhood infill, expanding transit options increases neighborhood resilience dlvr.it/ShRrFM

25th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

10 American cities with a great downtown dlvr.it/ShNxXH

24th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

With a few strategies and tools, public procurement directors can recruit new, diverse staffers dlvr.it/ShNnj4

24th January 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.