https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


Reviving a pension plan

Reviving a pension plan

At the start of 1995, Connecticut's $12 billion public pension plan ranked dead last among the nation's large public pension funds. Despite half its assets
  • Written by Christopher Burnham
  • 1st July 1998

At the start of 1995, Connecticut’s $12 billion public pension plan ranked dead last among the nation’s large public pension funds. Despite half its assets being invested in stocks, the fund’s 10-year annualized return was just 10 percent – about the same as the average bond fund and a whopping 139 basis points behind the average public pension plan’s return.

In January 1995, a new team took over the fund’s management and began one of the largest public pension fund restructurings in history. The turnaround began when a blue-ribbon panel of investment experts was convened to assess the fund’s problems and determine appropriate corrective action. Additionally, the state hired a pension consultant to help select investment managers and monitor performance. Following are examples of key problems identified by the team and the steps taken to solve them.

* The state was allocating assets without a clear understanding of the pension fund’s long-term liabilities. Minimizing the fund’s long-term liability was as much a priority for the new management team as was maximizing returns. The team analyzed the impact different asset allocations and market conditions had upon the fund’s asset growth and unfunded liability, and the findings provided the basis for a more rational asset-allocation strategy.

* As they expanded the fund into new asset classes, the former administrators failed to rethink their investment strategy. However, guided by the asset-liability study, the new team analyzed how each available asset class would fit into a prudent investment strategy. That analysis prompted a decision to eliminate international fixed-income securities as an asset class since such securities were more volatile than domestic bonds, without superior returns.

The team also separated the equities that performed best with active management from those that lent themselves to passive management or indexing. As a result, investment management costs declined, risks were reduced, and the fund’s performance picked up. * Under the previous management, the number of investment managers increased while performance decreased, yet accountability was virtually nonexistent. By contrast, the new team introduced quarterly performance reviews and rated managers’ performance against newly implemented benchmarks. Managers that under-performed or failed to follow agreed-upon strategies were disciplined and/or fired.

The new team reviewed a total of 70 investment managers, told them their contracts were under review and invited new managers to compete for the fund’s business. (Nearly 400 investment managers responded.) The management team fired all but six of its investment managers and ultimately settled on a staff of 30.

* Despite its poor performance, the fund had been paying exorbitant management fees. To reward success and punish failure, the new team introduced performance-based fees, making clear to investment managers the link between their performance and fees. Performance-based fees saved the fund $11 million in the first year.

* Over the years the fund had become thoroughly politicized, with investment managers being chosen more for their political connections and contributions than for their performance. At the team’s urging, Connecticut’s legislature passed a law that forbids contributions to political campaigns by companies doing business with the state. The law freed the pension plan to focus on doing what is best for the people of Connecticut and for the 52,000 people who depend on the fund for their benefits.

In less than three years, the transformation was complete. By mid-1997, a year after restructuring concluded, the fund ranked in the top quartile of all large pension funds.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come
    When the pandemic struck in 2020, public retention was hit hard: jobs in local government plummeted by 8.5 percent; state employment dropped by 4.4 percent. Two years later, local and state government jobs have rebounded by about half—to 4.1 and 1.9 percent below pre-pandemic levels respectively, according to a new report from Mission Square Research […]
  • Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships
    The so-called “American dream” of upward mobility has more or less stagnated: Today, a little more than 40 percent of children raised at the bottom of the income ladder remain there as adults, according to Pew Charitable Trusts, and only half grow up to earn more than their parents. This data points to a concerning […]
  • hybrid technology
    Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making
    There’s one kind of technology that state and local governments covet, says Rob Carey, president of Cloudera Government Solutions. “While supporting multiple state and local government agencies, our team has noticed an increase in the need for hybrid cloud solutions.” A hybrid cloud is the combination of both public and private cloud deployment models. In […]
  • Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
    Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses
    After two years of ping-pong lockdown orders, mask mandates, unprecedented vaccine drives and economic uncertainty, cities across the United States are beginning to emerge in the pandemic’s aftermath, and they’re prioritizing infrastructure, according to a report published Wednesday by the National League of Cities (NLC).  “The new normal, as we now understand it, is here,” […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Harris County deploys next-generation security in 150 public buildings
  • Public procurement can be transformative for stakeholders in a community
  • The 10 Most Sustainable Large U.S. Cities
  • How local governments can get ahead of the infrastructure wave: Strategies to mitigate risk

White papers


How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come dlvr.it/SSnmS7

24th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships dlvr.it/SSkGBn

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making dlvr.it/SSk3H0

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses dlvr.it/SSgBck

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Oklahoma City puts the focus on employees when implementing changes in office technology dlvr.it/SSfyns

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Please take this brief survey and let us know how your organization is managing your budg… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Buying smart solutions: Technology is now part of (almost) every government purchase dlvr.it/SSbj3Z

21st June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid tech labor shortage, outsourcing digital services could provide relief dlvr.it/SSbj23

21st June 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X