https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


San Francisco cleans up

San Francisco cleans up

Used to be in San Francisco, Calif., every rainfall, shower or downpour, caused the combined sewers to overflow at the shoreline of San Francisco Bay,
  • Written by American City & County Administrator
  • 1st December 1997

Used to be in San Francisco, Calif., every rainfall, shower or downpour, caused the combined sewers to overflow at the shoreline of San Francisco Bay, contaminating the beaches, preventing residents from swimming, surfing and board sailing and forcing the city to post health warnings at the shoreline for months at a time.

In 1972, Congress passed the Clean Water Act, which set in motion a nationwide effort to clean up the country’s waterways.

Two years later, San Francisco adopted a master plan for wastewater management. In 1997, the city embarked on a program to build necessary facilities to upgrade wastewater treatment and protect San Francisco Bay and the Pacific Ocean. The major components of the program were completed in March 1997.

The construction projects have included new treatment plants located on both sides of the city; wet weather storage tunnels that ring the city and store and treat combined sewage during wet weather; and a deep outfall discharge that conveys treated Westside wastewater 4.5 miles beyond the shoreline.

As a result, San Francisco is one of the first cities in the country with combined sewers to achieve full compliance with Clean Water Act requirements. The city wastewater facilities now capture, store and treat all wet weather flows, sewage and stormwater, protecting the bay and the ocean.

Upgrading its system presented a unique challenge to San Francisco, because, during rainstorms, the city’s many hills, combined with the high percentage of paved surfaces, quickly created a large volume of stormwater runoff. The highly urbanized city had very little space for the construction of facilities or the large storage and transport systems needed to hold stormwater. These physical factors complicated the construction of wastewater control facilities.

Additionally, the rocky terrain and the shoreline areas used for the system’s storage/transports are below sea level, so engineers did whatever they could to make the building process easier. For example, they used open trench construction with pilings to hold back the sides of excavations.

And in sandy areas below the waterline, contractors introduced soft soil tunneling techniques never before used in the United States. Coffer dams were used along the shoreline to protect the bay’s resources.

The storage/transports catch the combined stormwater and sewage as it overflows the sewer system but before it reaches the shoreline of the bay or ocean. The transports also hold stormwater and sewage for later treatment.

Total storage capacity is equivalent to two days of waste flow during dry weather. The transports also provide treatment consisting of settling and removal of floatable materials prior to shoreline discharge when wastewater flows exceed the system’s total storage capacity.

By 1982, about 70 percent of the combined sewage was controlled. By 1986, an additional 20 percent was controlled with primary treatment. In 1993, secondary treatment was available for this component. Program completion provided control and treatment for the remaining 10 percent. Although this last component constituted the smallest volume, it also involved some of the most difficult construction, with costs that exceeded $300 million.

The Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant, a major component of the master plan, was built two-thirds underground so that part of the San Francisco Zoo could be built above it. This sharing of land was necessary in the relatively small and dense city; otherwise, it would have been impossible to site the facility. Such concepts won awards for design, construction and operation.

For wastewater treatment systems, the ultimate environmental performance measure involves sampling marine organisms and conducting bioassay tests to determine if the treated effluent causes harm. This sampling and testing has consistently shown no adverse affects to the marine life of the bay or ocean.

The newly completed program means that sewage-carried trash is no longer on the beach or in the water. Additionally, the beaches can now be used after rainstorms because bacteria levels are not a threat to public health.

Community involvement was a major component of each project within the program. The Citizen’s Advisory Committee on Wastewater provided overall program oversight for 25 years, and the city established special task forces, comprised of government agencies, community groups and individuals, for several component projects.

Issues addressed by the residents included facility location, appropriate treatment levels and localized construction impacts. Community involvement resulted in improvements to public resources.

Areas receiving improvement included a community center in one of the affected neighborhoods, a park, jogging paths, the oceanside highway (which was re-configured to hiking, biking and equestrian trails), and a seawall.

To meet the strict deadlines, including those for permits and enforcement orders, the city established a separate organization within the government: the Clean Water Enterprise.

This group, which made all the key decisions, consisted of managers, administrators, engineers and scientists who focused solely on the waterway construction program. The projects included two secondary treatment plants, three tunnels, four major pump stations and 11 major storage/transport facilities providing 190 million gallons worth of storage for combined sewage.

The facilities have been designed to high aesthetic standards to enhance the city’s visual environment. Most are underground, but the above-ground pump stations and treatment plants are intended to improve the urban landscape.

San Francisco paid approximately half the construction cost for the new facilities, and EPA and the California State Water Resources Control Board provided the remainder. (The city’s sewer service fees are in the mid-range nationwide and are the exclusive source of revenue to pay for debt service on bonds and repay loans as well as provide funds for regular operations and maintenance.)

Construction took 20 years and required an expenditure of more than $1.4 billion, or $1,900 for every person in the city.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient
    This article first appeared on Urgent Communication. It’s a scenario we’ve all experienced: an ambulance with a blaring siren racing against time to get a person in medical distress to a hospital through traffic. What we don’t see is 5G connectivity enabling paramedics to communicate with hospital staff via video conference and coordinate care in […]
  • Shifting city demographics present an opportunity to build coalitions, address inequality
    Minority-majority cities are driving American growth. New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago, for example, combined for an estimated 16% of the nation’s total gross domestic product in 2021—future projections anticipate a continuation of this trend, and an opportunity to create coalitions to address injustices. Between 2015 and 2020, 22% of U.S. cities were majority-minority, […]
  • ARPA funds
    Spending American Rescue Plan Act funds: A primer for municipalities
    The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 is a $1.9 trillion legislative package that includes funding for states, local governments and tribal nations to respond to the economic and public health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. While initially restricted, subsequent guidance from the federal government has expanded what those funds can be used for. […]
  • New York City, New York
    Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand
    Given the reliance on vehicular transportation in the United States, some American cities historically haven’t prioritized being walkable in past planning and or design. But amid an unprecedented shift in the economy toward remote work, those that have are increasingly desirable for prospective residents. A new report from Smart Growth American and Places Platform, “Foot Traffic […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • North Texas alliance partners with Marketplace.city on smart government solutions
  • Harris County deploys next-generation security in 150 public buildings
  • Public procurement can be transformative for stakeholders in a community
  • The 10 Most Sustainable Large U.S. Cities

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022

Learn the benefits of transforming and automating your Contract Management process

4th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023

10 American cities with a great downtown

24th January 2023

Miami leads the way in FT-Nikkei ranking of best U.S. cities for foreign companies

20th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient dlvr.it/ShYNcx

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Shifting city demographics present an opportunity to build coalitions, address inequality dlvr.it/ShYMMm

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Spending American Rescue Plan Act funds: A primer for municipalities dlvr.it/ShXzvl

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand dlvr.it/ShVhBW

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Managing landslides along road corridors using remote sensing dlvr.it/ShTpL6

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Prioritizing neighborhood infill, expanding transit options increases neighborhood resilience dlvr.it/ShRrFM

25th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

10 American cities with a great downtown dlvr.it/ShNxXH

24th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

With a few strategies and tools, public procurement directors can recruit new, diverse staffers dlvr.it/ShNnj4

24th January 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.