https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


Republicans target AMT for repeal

Republicans target AMT for repeal

In 1992, Texas Utilities earned a $1 billion profit and paid $19.6 million - 2 percent of its gross income - in taxes. While that may not seem like much,
  • Written by Silverstein, Kenneth
  • 1st October 1995

In 1992, Texas Utilities earned a $1 billion profit and paid $19.6 million – 2 percent of its gross income – in taxes. While that may not seem like much, the fact is the company would have received an $18 million tax rebate if Congress did not impose a minimum tax or alternative minimum tax (AMT).

The most profitable companies pay a 35 percent tax on their profits, less any allowable deductions. Those deductions, however, mean that some companies will have a minimal net income and, therefore, will not pay much, if anything, in taxes. In fact, a 1986 survey of 250 of the nation’s most profitable companies by the Washington-based Citizens for Tax Justice found that 130 of them paid no federal income tax in at least one year between 1981 and 1985.

By comparison, the group found that from 1987 to 1992, after the AMT had been reauthorized, total corporate income tax payments increased by $21.6 billion. That is still only 3.8 percent of the total taxes that corporations paid during that period – hardly a burden, says Robert McIntyre, director of the tax group.

But many Republicans say the AMT not only hurts corporate competiveness, it also damages state and local government because the tax-free interest saved from buying municipal and private activity bonds – bonds used to finance airports, for instance – is added back if a company triggers the AMT. Thus, the incentive to purchase those bonds is diminished for corporations, tax opponents argue.

“As a result of the corporate AMT, corporate investors limit their purchases of bonds issued by state and local governments to finance public investment,” says John Vogt, senior vice president for the New York-based Public Securities Association, which represents securities firms participating in the bond market.

To attract investment, state and local governments must pay higher rates, adds Cathy Spain, director of the Government Finance Officers Association in Washington. Repeal of the AMT would therefore “contribute significantly to lowering state and local government borrowing costs.”

Opponents of the AMT may have their prayers answered. The House has passed a Republican-led proposal to phase out the AMT by the year 2000. The current provision applying the AMT to tax-exempt interest would be removed immediately.

While the administration and its Democratic backers say the AMT could be simplified, they are averse to outright repeal, arguing that simple fairness precludes them from allowing companies with substantial income to avoid taxes.

If the Republican bill is enacted, the Treasury Department says about 76,000 companies currently paying taxes would be able to avoid such responsibility.

And furthermore, some Democrats claim that the tax-exempt interest inclusion in the AMT calculation is necessary to minimize tax avoidance, as well as to provide a level playing field for those entities offering taxable securities.

The Senate is unlikely to go as far as the House and vote to repeal the AMT. Finance Committee Chairman Bob Packwood (R – Ore.), who will control the measure’s immediate fate in the Senate, helped reinstitute the tax in 1986 when Republicans controlled the Senate. “The ability of highly profitable corporations to pay little or no tax undermines respect for the entire tax system, said Packwood in 1986. It is a sentiment he still espouses.

Because the AMT is part of the large, controversial 1996 budget expected to be voted on in October, its future is uncertain. In any event, if bills now pending to scrap the current tax system altogether reach fruition, the whole discussion could be moot.

Kenneth Silverstein is the Washington correspondent for American City & County.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come
    When the pandemic struck in 2020, public retention was hit hard: jobs in local government plummeted by 8.5 percent; state employment dropped by 4.4 percent. Two years later, local and state government jobs have rebounded by about half—to 4.1 and 1.9 percent below pre-pandemic levels respectively, according to a new report from Mission Square Research […]
  • Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships
    The so-called “American dream” of upward mobility has more or less stagnated: Today, a little more than 40 percent of children raised at the bottom of the income ladder remain there as adults, according to Pew Charitable Trusts, and only half grow up to earn more than their parents. This data points to a concerning […]
  • hybrid technology
    Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making
    There’s one kind of technology that state and local governments covet, says Rob Carey, president of Cloudera Government Solutions. “While supporting multiple state and local government agencies, our team has noticed an increase in the need for hybrid cloud solutions.” A hybrid cloud is the combination of both public and private cloud deployment models. In […]
  • Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
    Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses
    After two years of ping-pong lockdown orders, mask mandates, unprecedented vaccine drives and economic uncertainty, cities across the United States are beginning to emerge in the pandemic’s aftermath, and they’re prioritizing infrastructure, according to a report published Wednesday by the National League of Cities (NLC).  “The new normal, as we now understand it, is here,” […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • VCPWA Water and Sanitation to install money-saving battery energy storage system
  • NACTO announces 10 winners of Streets for Pandemic Response and Recovery grants
  • Why state and local governments need to future-proof their sales tax processes with technology
  • ASCE releases new manual to plan and design for hazards

White papers


How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come dlvr.it/SSnmS7

24th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships dlvr.it/SSkGBn

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making dlvr.it/SSk3H0

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses dlvr.it/SSgBck

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Oklahoma City puts the focus on employees when implementing changes in office technology dlvr.it/SSfyns

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Please take this brief survey and let us know how your organization is managing your budg… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Buying smart solutions: Technology is now part of (almost) every government purchase dlvr.it/SSbj3Z

21st June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid tech labor shortage, outsourcing digital services could provide relief dlvr.it/SSbj23

21st June 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X