https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


GAC can be affordable alternative

GAC can be affordable alternative

Most people believe powdered activated carbon (PAC) is a more cost-effective water treatment method than granular activated carbon (GAC). Over the last
  • Written by Vickers, Annette; Van Stone, Gary
  • 1st February 1995

Most people believe powdered activated carbon (PAC) is a more cost-effective water treatment method than granular activated carbon (GAC). Over the last decade, several articles have been published about the cost of installed GAC treatment systems, and their conclusions are enough to make most cities think twice about implementing GAC.

In reality, these research studies are based on constructing GAC treatment facilities from the ground up when most U.S. plants using activated carbon have retrofitted existing facilities. Data show the incremental cost of retrofitting GAC is usually less than 1/2 cent per day per family, with the high end (involving facility construction) at 6 cents per day per family, placing GAC more in line with PAC economically.

Across the country water departments that retrofitted their plants for GAC were recently surveyed regarding the actual costs they have experienced. The results show most facilities incurred little capital costs to retrofit their plants. The majority of sites only required a replacement of the current media (sand/anthracite) with GAC.

In day-to-day operation, the typical PAC water treatment facility, using an average of 3, 5 or 7 milligrams of powdered carbon for every 1 mg of water annually, spends between $31,000 and $75,000 per year to produce 10 mgd of treated water. Since GAC provides taste and odor control for three years, it is necessary to first annualize the cost for GAC treatment, then compare those numbers with the PAC numbers.

At a typical empty bed contact time (EBCT) of five minutes, the cost of GAC is comparable to PAC at standard dosages. Obviously, the numbers vary based on the EBCT and PAC dosage level, but — for the majority of water plants — the additional cost per family is between 1/4- to 1/2-cent per day for either PAC or GAC. To determine an accurate PAC vs. GAC cost comparison for a facility, the influent conditions of the water and the ultimate treatment objective must be considered.

A quick rule of thumb to estimate conversion quantities is that GAC is roughly three times more effective on a weight-basis than PAC for taste and odor control. That means for 90,000 pounds of PAC, the same quality of water can be achieved with 30,000 pounds of GAC.

A report issued by Environmental Engineering & Technology, a New York environmental consulting firm, for Erie County (Pa.) Water Authority concludes that the use of GAC filter media is cost-effective. They base their findings on comparing GAC filter usage with PAC doses ranging from 15 mg/L to 30 mg/L, for a 70 mgd plant flow at two- and one-year replacement frequency.

EBCT in these studies averaged two minutes. In normal circumstances, a five -minute EBCT is recommended for effective treatment over several years. It is better to operate at a five-minute EBCT and keep the carbon online for three years instead of only one year at a two-minute EBCT.

As a result of installing GAC, retrofitted plants reported a minor savings in sludge disposal costs and utility costs (for running the mixer for the PAC slurry). The biggest savings, however, centers on chemical cost changes. After installing GAC, the use of chemicals — including disinfectants (primarily chlorine), coagulants/polymers (aluminum sulfate, sodium sulfate, ferric sulfate) for turbidity removal and potassium permanganate for taste and odor control — declines substantially.

For example, the city of Cincinnati reduced chlorine costs by two-thirds when it switched to GAC. The city estimates an incremental cost of $22 per family annually or six cents per day. Another city reported its decrease in chemical costs was so significant the move to GAC resulted in a net savings.

Granulated carbon offers other advantages, including:

Passive technology. Once a GAC system is installed, an operator does not have to determine dosages on a day-to-day basis as influent conditions change. This is especially important if source water comes from a highly traveled river where spills or contamination frequently occur.

More convenience. Most PAC users dose at particular times, roughly four months a year, but if PAC is used year-round, the advantages of GAC increase.

Less waste. Reducing powdered carbon cuts the amount of sludge requiring disposal.

Less contamination. GAC eliminates powdered carbon bleeding into the distribution system.

Better taste and smell. Many water plants report a drop in customer complaints after a switch to GAC.

Increased effectiveness. GAC’s effectiveness for organics removal will help since regulation of organics in drinking water is becoming more stringent.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come
    When the pandemic struck in 2020, public retention was hit hard: jobs in local government plummeted by 8.5 percent; state employment dropped by 4.4 percent. Two years later, local and state government jobs have rebounded by about half—to 4.1 and 1.9 percent below pre-pandemic levels respectively, according to a new report from Mission Square Research […]
  • Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships
    The so-called “American dream” of upward mobility has more or less stagnated: Today, a little more than 40 percent of children raised at the bottom of the income ladder remain there as adults, according to Pew Charitable Trusts, and only half grow up to earn more than their parents. This data points to a concerning […]
  • hybrid technology
    Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making
    There’s one kind of technology that state and local governments covet, says Rob Carey, president of Cloudera Government Solutions. “While supporting multiple state and local government agencies, our team has noticed an increase in the need for hybrid cloud solutions.” A hybrid cloud is the combination of both public and private cloud deployment models. In […]
  • Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
    Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses
    After two years of ping-pong lockdown orders, mask mandates, unprecedented vaccine drives and economic uncertainty, cities across the United States are beginning to emerge in the pandemic’s aftermath, and they’re prioritizing infrastructure, according to a report published Wednesday by the National League of Cities (NLC).  “The new normal, as we now understand it, is here,” […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Arbor Day Foundation and Intrinsyx Environmental offer natural solution to clean up industrial contamination in cities and towns
  • MS-ISAC members get free access to Deloitte’s Cyber Detect and Respond Portal to help respond to cyber threats
  • Deltek releases 12th annual Clarity Government Contracting Report
  • How local governments can improve bridge projects through strategic engagement

White papers


How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come dlvr.it/SSnmS7

24th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships dlvr.it/SSkGBn

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making dlvr.it/SSk3H0

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses dlvr.it/SSgBck

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Oklahoma City puts the focus on employees when implementing changes in office technology dlvr.it/SSfyns

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Please take this brief survey and let us know how your organization is managing your budg… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Buying smart solutions: Technology is now part of (almost) every government purchase dlvr.it/SSbj3Z

21st June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid tech labor shortage, outsourcing digital services could provide relief dlvr.it/SSbj23

21st June 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X