https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Administration


Expanding Medicaid

  • Written by lisaacs
  • 23rd August 2012
The Supreme Court ruling on the federal healthcare law presented a significant question for each state, and each state’s decision will have financial consequences for its local governments

What is in this article?

  • Expanding Medicaid
  • Counties play the waiting game
  • The changing landscape

Expanding Medicaid

Public health officials expected the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to clarify the federal effort to expand coverage to millions of uninsured Americans. But that’s not how it turned out.

Though the justices agreed by a narrow margin that the U.S. Constitution allows the federal government to mandate that Americans buy insurance, they surprisingly struck down Congress’ ability to threaten states with severe financial penalties if states do not expand coverage through the Medicaid program to a huge pool of the currently uninsured. Under the ACA, the federal government would pay the entire cost for millions of new Medicaid participants for the first three years and 90 percent after that.

Now, governors are mulling whether to accept Medicaid expansion, with some arguing it will be a costly burden to their state. That leaves local officials and public health institutions struggling to figure out how to proceed. “It’s a tough environment,” says Robert Pestronk, executive director of the Washington-based National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO). “It’s a perfect storm of complexity and challenge right now.”

Pestronk and others predict that the future of the health scene will not be fully settled until after the November elections: If elected, Republican opponents of the legislation vow to repeal the whole law, while Democrat defenders pledge to push forward if they remain in power. Even if Democrats prevail nationally, many governors opposed to Medicaid expansion now have the power to just say no.

Most governors consider options

Immediately after the Supreme Court decision, governors split along party lines, with about a half dozen Republican governors refusing to expand their programs. Among the most vociferous opponents, Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R), whose state has one of the largest populations of uninsured in the nation, issued a statement that, “Expanding Medicaid would mandate the admission of millions of additional Texans into the already unsustainable Medicaid program, at a potential cost of billions to Texas taxpayers.”

At the same time, a few Democratic governors announced that they were moving forward and would expand their Medicaid programs because they think in the end it will save money for their state. But the vast majority of governors, both Democrat and Republican, have issued statements that they would study their options before proceeding and would not rule out accepting the Medicaid expansion. Adding to the complexity, once governors decide to move ahead, they may still face opposition from their legislatures.

Because of its vast scope, the revision of Medicaid is likely to have the greatest effect on local public health programs. Medicaid is a federal-state health insurance program for the poor, now mostly covering children, mothers and the disabled. The expansion in the ACA was originally expected to add roughly 15 million uninsured low-income people, mainly adults without children, who currently are not eligible in most states.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office now predicts that with the Supreme Court decision and subsequent decisions at the state level, 6 million of those 15 million uninsured will no longer gain coverage under expanded Medicaid. CBO further estimates that about 3 million of that 6 million will remain uninsured, because they do not qualify for Medicaid under current rules and are not eligible for subsidized private insurance in new state marketplaces (called exchanges) created under the ACA.

Representatives of the hospital industry are among the strongest proponents of the expansion of Medicaid for several reasons. Because they cannot deny care to the uninsured who use their services, they must either absorb the cost of care for patients who cannot pay for the services or pass the cost on in the form of higher charges to insurance companies, or in the case of public hospitals, to local taxpayers. In addition, hospitals agreed to accept billions in lower rates of federal reimbursements for some of their charges, with the expectation that the expanded Medicaid rolls would provide a new and more reliable source of funding.

“We believe that expanding Medicaid will help take some of the load off of local taxpayers,” says Shawn Gremminger, assistant vice president for legislative affairs at the National Association of Public Hospitals (NAPH), a Washington-based group that represents the interests of 160 of the nation’s largest public hospitals. “If governors don’t accept the expanded Medicaid, it will shift the cost back to cities and counties.”

The economic stakes can be huge. Dave Dillon, spokesman for the Missouri Hospital Association, says that profits at the state’s hospitals could be reduced by $700 million per year because of the double hit of the reduced payment schedules coupled with a refusal to expand Medicaid to the larger population of uninsured. “It would be a huge financial hardship,” he says.

Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) has been an outspoken opponent of all aspects of the ACA and has said he will refuse Medicaid expansion funds from the federal government because the state cannot afford the costs he believes will be foisted on the state. Bruce Rueben, president of the Florida Hospital Association, argues to his state’s leaders that by refusing the Medicaid money, the state does not save money. “I am trying to help people understand the consequences,” he says. “If we don’t do it, the state will not save a penny. The need remains, regardless if it goes forward or not.” Additionally, Rueben counters that if the federal taxes raised from Florida residents are not spent on expanding Medicaid to the Florida uninsured, “we are just financing coverage to people in other states” that are participating in it.

1 | 2 | 3 |
Counties play the waiting game
Tags: Administration Article

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Lessons from your friendly neighborhood public service employees
  • Harris County deploys next-generation security in 150 public buildings
  • How local governments can get ahead of the infrastructure wave: Strategies to mitigate risk
  • Prioritizing rapid restore leads to stronger ransomware attack recovery

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022

Learn the benefits of transforming and automating your Contract Management process

4th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


These 10 American cities are well prepared for a tech-based future

1st February 2023

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023

10 American cities with a great downtown

24th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Amid spike, federal transportation department launches initiative to curb traffic-related deaths dlvr.it/Shvs31

3rd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Engaging businesses to strengthen your community dlvr.it/ShvZn0

3rd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Some public employees face financial hardship; comprehensive pay packages proved ‘a pathway toward economic… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

2nd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Strategic Budgeting for Modern Government dlvr.it/ShrHmD

2nd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

These 10 American cities are well prepared for a tech-based future dlvr.it/Shp7sH

1st February 2023
AmerCityCounty

How public health can build a “one health” infrastructure for the future dlvr.it/ShnlKm

1st February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Four Steps to Better Municipal Fleet Fuel Purchasing dlvr.it/ShnbWP

1st February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: With increase popularity of e-bikes and e-scooters, there’s a need for ‘safe and connected infrastructure’ dlvr.it/ShlKmJ

31st January 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.