https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Smart Cities & Technology


Cities make end run around data network obstructions

Cities make end run around data network obstructions

Some local governments are facing obstacles to build their own high-speed data networks — either from providers in their regions or state laws that create barriers to community broadband or outright ban it.
  • Written by Lynnette Luna
  • 2nd March 2010

With the desire to spur economic development and improve city operations, many municipalities around the country are planning to build their own high-speed data networks because they are fed up with what they view as the lack of or inadequate services from incumbent cable and telecommunications companies. But some local governments are facing obstacles — either from providers in their regions or state laws that create barriers to community broadband or outright ban it.

“In many ways, this is the biggest fight since electrification,” says Christopher Mitchell, director of the Telecommunications as Commons Initiative at the Institute for Local Self-Reliance, a Minneapolis-based non-profit. “It’s reminiscent of private electric companies in the 1920s and 30s when smaller cities built their own electricity networks because private utilities ignored them.”

Mitchell says 18 states have imposed some barriers to community broadband networks, such as administrative and procedural hurdles, while Texas, Arkansas, Missouri and Nebraska have instituted outright bans. In many states, the telecom incumbents have been the ones influencing policy. In other regions, where state law isn’t stopping municipalities from building networks, incumbents are filing suit, likely hoping to dissuade municipalities from moving forward.

Because businesses are attracted to highly connected regions, municipalities mainly build their own networks for economic development, often after incumbents deny their requests for higher data speeds and better coverage. After building a fiber network in 1997 and using it for city applications, Longmont, Colo., wanted to sell access to service providers. It also wanted to take over a privately built Wi-Fi network that the city was contracting services from. Last November, Longmont put this issue up to voters, as required by state law, and lost.

A 2005 Colorado law bans municipalities from providing any type of advanced telecommunications services unless more than 50 percent of the voters favor the plan. Longmont’s ballot question asked voters to allow the city to provide services either directly or in partnership with a private company, but 57 percent of voters said no.

“Comcast decided it didn’t want Longmont to go there,” says Tom Roiniotis, director of Longmont Power & Communications, the city’s community-owned electric utility. Comcast spent about $200,000, the largest contribution to any campaign in Longmont’s history, to defeat the measure, Roiniotis says. Meanwhile, once the issue became a ballot initiative, Longmont was not allowed to spend any money to campaign for the ballot initiative because that would violate campaign financing laws. “We were walking with one arm and one leg tied behind our back when it came to this campaign,” Roiniotis says.

Fortunately for Longmont, another private company bought the Wi-Fi assets and is keeping the network running. But as Roiniotis says, “We still have shackles in terms of our ability to innovate.”

Mitchell says incumbent providers are typically strong forces in the legislature and are “very good at finding sympathetic local groups or creating them to spread lies and half truths about the issue.” In particular, incumbents spread that notion that broadband networks are funded by tax dollars and typically aren’t successful in other areas.

The reality is, these networks are funded by outside investors and are doing well in many areas of the country, Mitchell says. According to a recent report from the Washington-based FTTH (Fiber to the Home) Council, the number of subscribers (take rates) nationwide for “retail municipal systems after one to four years of operation averages 54 percent. This is much higher than larger incumbent service provider take rates, and is also well above the typical FTTH business plan usually requiring a 30 to 40 percent take rate to break even with payback periods.”

Mitchell also cites examples of projects that are moving forward despite incumbent opposition. In Lafayette, La., where city officials asked its incumbents to enhance the local broadband network but were denied, the city decided to build its own. The incumbents subsequently filed suit, but after years of litigation, the city began offering a fiber network to businesses and consumers.

Mitchell says Lafayette offers a 10 Mbps symmetrical connection for $30 per month and a 50 Mbps symmetrical connection for $58, some of the cheapest rates in the nation. The cable incumbent there now has decided to upgrade its network.

Andrew Cohill, president of Blacksburg, Va.-based Design Nine Networks, says one of the more successful models for municipalities is the open services model. Under this arrangement, municipalities or a group of local governments build out a network and then sell capacity to any operator. He says the model drives competition and typically avoids incumbent opposition. “This way, local governments don’t get in the way,” Cohill says. “Why delay a project for often a couple of years and spend a lot on legal bills if you can construct a business model that is incumbent friendly?”

Wired Road in southwest Virginia was formed after local governments in the Twin Counties region created a regional broadband authority to build an integrated fiber and wireless network to sell to service providers. Cohill reports that after 18 months in operation, five service providers have signed on and the cost of Internet access has fallen by 50 percent in less than a year.

Of course, such a model is not foolproof. As Roiniotis points out, Longmont’s desire is to sell capacity to other service providers, but that plan was heavily opposed anyway.

Lynnette Luna is a contributing writer to Urgent Communications, a sister publication to Government Product News.

Related Stories

  • Broadband stimulus fund applicants sharpen their proposals for the second round
  • Municipal network in Sooner State offers wealth of weather data
  • Broadband systems are saving money, one wireless community at a time
  • Consortiums will be likely winners of broadband stimulus funding
Tags: News Smart Cities & Technology

Related


  • A video surveillance camera and sign warning about CCTV being in operation
    All activities monitored: The 10 most surveilled major cities in the U.S.
    Public close-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, or public video surveillance camera, hold multiple benefits for cities. They can help reduce crimes around public areas, buildings and roads, and with the increasing deployment of smart sensors and 5G, these cameras will be able to utilize the Internet of Things (IoT) to accomplish much more in the future. […]
  • A street in Denver
    Denver anticipates autonomous vehicles with cross-agency, cross-sector collaborative planning
    Without early planning by regulators, autonomous vehicles (AVs) have the potential to fail on their promises of safer and more convenient travel. Before and even during the pandemic, which has understandably shifted priorities of local and state officials, leaders in AV policy development are nonetheless thinking about and producing plans to deal with hundreds of […]
  • Revenue and zoning evolution prepares Seattle for an autonomous vehicle future
    Although autonomous vehicles (AVs) are not fully ready for deployment, history provides strong incentive to begin planning for its implementation now. In the early 20th century, the growth of the automobile erupted faster than regulators could have imagined with far-reaching consequences. Although cars eventually helped fulfill promises of economic growth, middle-class jobs, and on-demand mobility, […]
  • A street in Los Angeles
    Los Angeles infrastructure inventory anticipates future autonomous vehicle policy
    With respect to autonomous vehicles (AVs), city and state regulators are eventually going to confront hundreds of interrelated policy and economic issues in order to adequately prepare their roads and populations for safe, fair, and effective use. During the pandemic, city budgets have become strained, and regulators understandably have important and pressing financial burdens such […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • How local governments can combat the affordable housing crisis
  • How cities are reclaiming street parking spaces for public use
  • Grand Rapids offers free Wi-Fi access to the public in 10 parks
  • Kentucky county invests over $13 million in building innovative public fiber network

White papers


How-to Tips to Prepare for Your Summer Construction Projects

5th April 2021

How to Procure an eProcurement System that Generates More Value from Your Budget

1st April 2021

The Technology Solutions Vital to Clerk Productivity in Our Post-Pandemic Communities

18th March 2021
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Georgia city moves to automated trash collection dlvr.it/RxX5Rl

12th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

The Community Game Changer: Library Outsourcing dlvr.it/RxLd6r

9th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Cooperative contracts can be an entryway for small and diverse companies to successfully compete for government sal… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

9th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Electric slide: Mayors form collaborative organization to purchase electric vehicles for cities dlvr.it/RxGsHY

8th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Celebrating the unsung heroes of the COVID-19 pandemic: Procurement professionals dlvr.it/RxGsG2

8th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Expanding opportunities: Nebraska’s bold procurement Concierge Program dlvr.it/RxGpyr

8th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

All activities monitored: The 10 most surveilled major cities in the U.S. dlvr.it/RxCKzy

7th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Denver anticipates autonomous vehicles with cross-agency, cross-sector collaborative planning dlvr.it/RxC1dP

7th April 2021

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X