https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Smart Cities & Technology


The future of green labels

The future of green labels

Too many environmental labels make it a challenge to judge their value. Is there help on the horizon?
  • Written by Scot Case
  • 1st October 2009

When environmental labels such as Energy Star, Green Seal and EcoLogo were first introduced in the late 1980s and early 1990s, government purchasers were the first to embrace them. Government purchasers saw them as a useful way to identify more environmentally preferable products and began including preferences or requirements for products meeting the standards in purchasing specifications.

Once government purchasers proved there was interest in buying more environmentally preferable products, manufacturers increased production to meet the demand. As a result, it became easier for the average consumer to buy “greener” products. Well-known consumer companies are now promoting “green” cleaning products, recycled-content, process chlorine-free paper and energy-efficient televisions and computers, among other “greener” offerings.

As interest in greener products expanded, there was also a corresponding increase in the number of environmental labels. In 1992, there were fewer than a dozen environmental labels in the entire world. There are now more than 300.

Too many environmental labels is actually making it more challenging for both government purchasers and the average consumer. Not all labels are created equal. In fact, some of the labels are essentially meaningless. A few creative entrepreneurs have even set up Websites to sell environmental certifications online without establishing an environmental standard, requiring any product testing or even reviewing the product.

Comparing eco-labels

There are three critical components of any labeling program — the validity of the standard on which the label is based, the process used to set the standard and the verification processes used to determine if a product meets the standard.

Based on recommendations by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Consumer’s Union (publisher of Consumer Reports) and members of the Global Ecolabeling Network (GEN), purchasers can use the following guidelines to identify the most credible labels.

1. Validity of the Standard

  • Standards should have a clear and consistent meaning. The meaning of the label should not change based on who is certifying a product or which manufacturer’s product is being certified.

  • Standards should be clear about what aspects of a product’s environmental performance it covers. They should include explicit information defining what ingredients and practices are acceptable or prohibited and which testing protocols are used to make such determinations.

  • Multi-attribute standards should be based on human health and environmental considerations throughout the life cycle of the product from raw material extraction, manufacture, use and ultimate disposal of the product. The life cycle stages considered and covered by the standard should be explicitly stated.

2. Standard-Setting Process

  • Standards should be developed in an open, public, transparent process that includes broad stakeholder participation including government purchasers, academic experts, environmental non-profits, government officials, manufacturers, suppliers and end users.

  • There should be no conflict of interest for the standard-setting organization.

  • Standards should be reviewed and updated on a regular basis.

3. Verification Process

There are a variety of verification procedures to determine whether a product meets a standard. Some are more rigorous (and more expensive) but provide a greater degree of assurance.

  • Self-verification. Individual companies determine whether their products meet the standard.

  • Self-verification with random audits. Individual companies verify their products, but an organization conducts random audits to ensure compliance.

  • Independent third-party certification. An independent organization certifies that the products meet the standard based on information provided by the manufacturer.

  • Independent third-party certification with on-site audits. An independent organization certifies the products meet the standards based on information provided by the manufacturer after an onsite visit to verify the accuracy of the information provided by the manufacturer.

It is important to note that a stringent verification process is meaningless if the standard being used is not meaningful.

Future of environmental labeling

With more than 300 environmental labels in use, it is challenging for professional purchasers and individual consumers to properly evaluate the various environmental claims being made. While the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has begun fining manufacturers and retailers for making false or misleading environmental claims, the FTC approach does not address the larger issue of label proliferation.

There are, however, a variety of efforts under way to create a national or global environmental labeling approach. Members of Congress are beginning to explore possible legislative remedies. Groups of retailers are working together to try to define a common approach. In addition, some of the existing environmental labeling programs are working together with government purchasers and others to define a solution.

Many of the solutions combine the strengths of various approaches currently available in the market. As illustrated in the diagram on page 22, one possible approach is to create a single labeling program that includes an easily recognized mark, a rating system to compare products (one, two, three, or four stars), an environmental nutrition label to provide additional information for experienced environmental purchasing professionals and an online database of additional environmental factors for experts.

Role of government purchasers

National Institute of Governmental Purchasing (NIGP) members, including members of the NIGP Green Knowledge Community (www.nigp.org), are actively involved with efforts to bring additional clarity to the green market. They are sharing information and expertise to ensure the systems that emerge meet the needs of government purchasers.

Widely Recognized North American Environmental Labels
PROGRAM NAME (ALPHABETICALLY) YEAR FOUNDED PUBLICLY AVAILABLE STANDARD? MULTI-ISSUE TRANSPARENT STANDARD DEVELOPMENT PROCESS? THIRD-PARTY CERTIFIED?
EcoLogo
www.ecologo.org
1988 X X X X
Energy Star
www.energystar.gov
1992 X X
EPEAT
www.epeat.net
2005 X X X
Forest Stewardship Council
www.fscus.org
1990 X X X
Green-e
www.green-e.org
2000 X X X
GreenGuard
www.greenguard.org
2001 X X X
Green Seal
www.greenseal.org
1989 X X X X
Sustainable Forestry Initiative
www.sfiprogram.org
1995 X X X
USDA Organic Standard
www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/NOP
2002 X X X
U.S. EPA Design for the Environment
www.epa.gov/dfe
1994 X
U.S. EPA Water Sense
www.epa.gov/watersense
2006 X X X

About the author

Scot Case has been researching and promoting responsible purchasing issues for 16 years. He is vice president of TerraChoice Environmental Marketing, which manages the EcoLogo program. Contact him via e-mail at [email protected] or in Reading, Pa., at 610-779-3770.

Related Stories

  • Polishing the Energy Star shine: How government purchasers can improve one of the world’s most important eco-labels
  • Green purchasing appears to be accelerating
  • U.S. Communities aims to help agencies go green
Tags: Procurement Smart Cities & Technology

Most Recent


  • Chattanooga, Tenn.
    Capitalizing on hybrid work, these 10 cities are ready to take advantage
    Hybrid work is an accelerating trend that’s becoming the norm as attitudes rapidly change. And amid this nationwide shift to work-from-home setups, local governments are moving quickly to capitalize on the emerging opportunities that come with a workforce that’s not physically tied to any particular office building. For administrators seeking to entice remote workers to […]
  • document imaging
    Local governments find document imaging solutions through cooperative contracts
    Today, local governments face security, document management and remote work challenges. Canon USA has several digital imaging products and systems that address these organizational tests. Canon USA’s state and local government solutions division provides a portfolio of imaging solutions and software offerings. These include its black-and-white and color multifunction devices as well as production center […]
  • Cybercrime is on the rise, and water treatment plants are particularly vulnerable
    With most town water treatment plants serving less than 50,000 people, they’re facing a problem: budgetary constraints preventing administrators from investing in their digital defenses, making them prime targets for cybercriminals. “It’s definitely becoming a trend—possibly because ransomware has become a thing now where people can make money. Water plants do matter to the general […]
  • Traffic signal technology tapped to reduce congestion in Portland's metro area
    A 2020 survey of traffic congestion in cities around the globe ranked Portland, Ore., as the 14th worst metro area in the nation and 115th worst in the world. That year, commuters lost 27 hours stuck in traffic. The latest push to reduce that commute time by TriMet, the region’s mass transit service, will bring […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • North Texas alliance partners with Marketplace.city on smart government solutions
  • Harris County deploys next-generation security in 150 public buildings
  • Prioritizing rapid restore leads to stronger ransomware attack recovery
  • Today’s infrastructure needs greater than roads and bridges - It’s time to face our digital connectiveness

White papers


Modern American Perspectives on Law Enforcement

14th July 2022

Reimagine the Employee Experience

12th July 2022

How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Partnership launches no-cost wastewater monitoring service for local governments dlvr.it/SW7N74

5th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Investing in America’s onsite wastewater treatment systems for equity and sustainability dlvr.it/SW4Mb9

4th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

With passage of PACT Act, veterans service officers are preparing for an influx in applicants dlvr.it/SW4KTg

4th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

The 5 Procurement Superpowers Shaping the Future of Public Procurement dlvr.it/SW4DqT

4th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

This exclusive whitepaper presents the most recent nationwide data that give an unbiased view of how residents real… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

3rd August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Capitalizing on hybrid work, these 10 cities are ready to take advantage dlvr.it/SW0cjT

3rd August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Increase in emergency response time caused by insufficient staffing, traffic congestion dlvr.it/SVxcLn

2nd August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Local governments find document imaging solutions through cooperative contracts dlvr.it/SVxJnL

2nd August 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X