https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Economy


Taking the lead in risk management

Taking the lead in risk management

Like their counterparts in other departments of local government, risk managers are interested in determining the "best practices" in their field. Identifying
  • Written by David Ammons
  • 1st July 2000

Like their counterparts in other departments of local government, risk managers are interested in determining the “best practices” in their field. Identifying local government risk managers and risk management programs with reputations for excellence is a good starting point.

Last year, the Department of Public Administration at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, mailed questionnaires to more than 2,000 local government risk management professionals across the United States and Canada, asking them to identify individual local government officials, departments or entire local government organizations (“reputational leaders”) that would be worthy models for others wishing to excel in risk management. The department received responses from 47 states, five Canadian provinces and the District of Columbia.

The tops

Altogether, 404 cities, counties, school districts and affiliated organizations were cited by the respondents for having outstanding risk management programs in local government. Seventy-two percent of those were cited by one respondent each; 17.3 percent were named by two respondents; 3.5 percent by three; and 7.2 percent by four or more respondents. The 29 most frequently cited programs clearly own national reputations as leaders in local government risk management.

Seventeen cities, seven counties, one combined municipal/county operation and four school districts comprised the 29. Led by Anaheim, Calif., which received 25 nods from 25 respondents, the most often-cited local governments span the country and serve populations as large as 3.2 million persons (Harris County, Texas) and as small as 60,110 (West Hartford, Conn.).

In many cases, especially among programs cited three times or fewer, favorable reputations were enjoyed within a given program’s state borders but not beyond. In contrast, several of the 29 top programs derived part of their reputational strength from respondents in other states. In fact, citations from outside their own states would have been sufficient to place three of the programs – Anaheim; Pima County, Ariz.; and Washoe County, Nev., and almost a fourth (Charlotte/Mecklenburg County, N.C.) – on the list of top programs without any support at all from in-state respondents.

As was the case with risk management programs, most of the officials cited as outstanding risk managers were named by only one respondent. A total of 437 persons were cited – 332 (76 percent) by only one respondent each. Fifty-seven (13 percent) were named by two respondents each, 21 (4.8 percent) by three each, and 27 (6.2 percent) by four or more respondents each.

Heading the list of reputational leaders were four officials who were cited 10 or more times as outstanding risk managers. Like his city, Anaheim Risk Manager Tom Vance led in citations with 23 respondents naming him. The other three managers with 10 or more citations – Dave Parker of Pima County, Tom Phillips of Santa Monica, Calif.; and Dan Pliszka of Charlotte/Mecklenburg County – also were affiliated with frequently cited risk management programs.

The search for best practices

Administrators and analysts searching for best practices are advised routinely to seek leads on outstanding programs from officials of relevant professional associations, writers and researchers in the field, consultants and other experts, as well as from their own colleagues. The survey provided that information in a concise form.

The questionnaires were sent primarily to members of the Public Risk Management Association (PRIMA), as well as to officers, board members and executive directors of the International Municipal Lawyers Association, the Public Agency Risk Managers Association, and the Public Risk Database Project. State league risk pool administrators, recent recipients of awards for public sector risk management, authors of books or articles on the subject, private consultants and officials of state risk management agencies also were surveyed.

PRIMA members generally agreed on the programs and risk managers with excellent national reputations. Most consultants and authors declined to provide recommendations, either because they were unprepared to offer that kind of advice or preferred not to do so. Results of the survey suggest that their advice might differ substantially from that of local government risk managers, but whether it would be better or worse remains an open question.

The eight responding consultants nominated 14 risk management programs as “best practices” models. They named only Charlotte, N.C., and Montgomery County, Md., three times or more, and they cited only one of the risk managers whose name appeared among the 27 most-cited reputational leaders offered by the other respondents. The four responding authors cited none of the programs or managers named by the panel as reputational leaders; however, two commended Cincinnati for its risk management program.

Pool administrators and state agency officials offered more nominations, but, again, their choices rarely matched those offered by other respondents. That does not mean that they – or the consultants and authors – have made invalid recommendations; it merely means that their choices tend to differ from those of PRIMA members in general, association officials and award winners. Using the survey results of the pool administrators, consultants and authors to institute a benchmarking project likely would result in a different project than using the results of PRIMA members, association officials and award winners would.

Outstanding public sector officials often toil in anonymity, and their commitment to excellence all too often is unnoticed and unappreciated. Even in their own communities, the contributions of dedicated and proficient administrators may be taken for granted by others who have grown to accept and expect top-notch performances every year. The 29 risk management programs and 27 risk managers cited in the survey enjoy reputations for excellence among knowledgeable persons in their own state and, in some cases, regionally or even nationally.

Still, having a reputation for excellence is not the same as having a confirmed record of performance excellence. The survey examined reputations only; no attempt was made to confirm whether the local governments and individual officials named are worthy of the reputations they have gained. (However, it is reasonable to expect a strong positive correlation between having a reputation for excellence and actually possessing that quality.) Benchmarkers hoping to improve their own operations by using the survey results for leads should keep those limitations in mind.

David Ammons is an associate professor of public administration at the University of North Carolina’s Institute of Government. He is the author of “Municipal Benchmarks: Assessing Local Performance and Establishing Community Standards,” and he consults with local gov-ernments on organizational and management concerns. Support for the study was provided by the Public Entity Risk Institute, the North Carolina League of Municipalities, Salisbury, N.C., and the Institute of Government at the University of North Carolina.

Tags: Economy

Most Recent


  • Report: 2022's losses negate last year's funding progress for public pensions
    Despite economic hardships brought about by the pandemic, American municipalities and states managed to reduce the funding shortfall of their public pension funds last year. But with looming financial uncertainty and the market turning downward, a new report finds that nearly all of those gains will be erased by the end of the year. “There […]
  • To bring in talent and diversify, Kansas community attracts remote workers with cash incentive
    The modern era of digital nomads and remote workers presents opportunity for local governments as much it’s brought on unforeseen challenges—like the need for high speed connectivity and an evolving economic landscape, as fewer people commute to brick-and-mortar offices. One community in Shawnee County, Kan. has capitalized on the migration, which was set into motion […]
  • Economic report from Pittsburgh provides insight into national recovery
    The latest Consumer Price Index update released Thursday by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics pegs inflation at a four-decade peak, increasing the economic pressure on communities emerging from two pandemic-fraught years. Year-over-year, prices are up 9.1%, according to the most recent information, representing an 8.6 percent increase from May. At the national level, the […]
  • Federal government launches $1B program to connect cities fractured by historic policy decisions
    Supporting America’s economy is a foundation comprised of roads, railways, bridges and waterways built to create opportunity and connect communities. But due to historical prejudice, some cities and counties are at a disadvantage—like minority neighborhoods cut off during the construction of the state highway system in the 1950s. The United States Department of Transportation announced […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Prioritizing rapid restore leads to stronger ransomware attack recovery
  • Rethinking the ways cities can invest in vital neighborhoods
  • How to innovate and invest on a budget in state and local IT services
  • Treasury Department launches Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds to deliver $350 billion in funding

White papers


Modern American Perspectives on Law Enforcement

14th July 2022

Reimagine the Employee Experience

12th July 2022

How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

When spending federal stimulus dollars, local governments should consider long-term, community impact dlvr.it/SWXJWZ

12th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

In Nevada county, data underpins efforts to address climate change dlvr.it/SWTGHy

11th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

$52B semiconductor investment intended to rejuvenate American manufacturing dlvr.it/SWPqHQ

10th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

How capital improvement project prioritization helps secure infrastructure funding dlvr.it/SWLQB7

9th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Climate bill lauded; predicted to reduce nation’s carbon foot print by 40% within decade dlvr.it/SWHGQL

8th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Partnership launches no-cost wastewater monitoring service for local governments dlvr.it/SW7N74

5th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Investing in America’s onsite wastewater treatment systems for equity and sustainability dlvr.it/SW4Mb9

4th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

With passage of PACT Act, veterans service officers are preparing for an influx in applicants dlvr.it/SW4KTg

4th August 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X