https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Economy


Municipal credit ratings survive economic downturn

Municipal credit ratings survive economic downturn

A number of market factors should help local governments weather any potential dip in the economy.
  • Written by John Puchalla
  • 1st May 2001

Over the past decade, Washington, D.C., had earned a reputation as a financial black hole. In January 1995, its general obligation bonds were downgraded to below investment-grade. Its financial ineptitude was so profound that, in April 1995, then-President Bill Clinton signed into law the District of Columbia Financial Responsibility and Management Assistance Act, creating an independent authority to oversee district finances and correct budget deficits and cash shortages.

Four-and-a-half years later, the district regained its investment-grade rating. Last March, its bonds were upgraded again.

D.C.’s success story was all a matter of control, says District Treasurer Anthony Calhoun. “We had a bad deal with the federal government that had to be re-worked,” Calhoun says. “We had an unfunded pension liability of $2.2 billion. And unlike Cleveland, Philadelphia and New York, we didn’t have a state to turn to to help us out.”

The district is now in the process of building up its cash reserves, Calhoun says. And the markets are responding.

Despite indications that the economy is slowing, Calhoun says the district is “guardedly optimistic. We’ve seen no evidence of a downturn. We know it’s around us, but, so far, things are looking good.”

Washington, D.C., is not unusual. Most cities remain optimistic about their ability to weather any economic downturn. In fact, a recent survey by the National League of Cities indicates that, while two of three cities report that their local economic outlooks have worsened or remained unchanged, respondents in four of five cities think they will be able to handle whatever the economy throws at them.

All indications are that the bond market feels similarly. So far, municipal credit quality has not suffered in the economic downturn, despite the fact that slower tax revenue growth has strained some local government budgets. That, however, has not been enough to weaken credit quality materially.

Overall, in recent months, ratings upgrades have outnumbered downgrades by a wide margin in the tax-backed sector. Largely because of California’s energy crisis and revenue and liquidity pressures affecting health care providers, the improvement in revenue-backed credit worth was not as strong.

Because the labor market remains tight and declining mortgage yields have thus far prevented home sales from falling to a recessionary pace, state and local government tax payments continue to grow modestly. The downside is that a slowdown in retail sales has weakened sales tax revenues.

Additionally, the recent reduction in corporate profits has had little effect on local government finances since corporate income taxes account for less than 5 percent of state and local government revenues. However, a huge 187 percent yearly first-quarter increase in announced corporate layoffs and rising initial unemployment claims suggest the latest slowdown in corporate profitability is softening the labor market. Weaker job growth would increase the pressure on personal income and sales taxes, which account for a significant 62 percent of state and local government revenues.

Greater economic diversity and the absence of jarring structural changes such as military base closings distinguish the current state of municipal credit quality from that of the period leading up to and encompassing the last recession. Conservative budgeting as well as the modest municipal debt growth and the dramatic increase in reserves over the last five years should help state and local governments withstand a slowdown in the U.S. economy better than they did in the early 1990s.

“The most important thing would be to control spending, be conservative in estimating revenues and negotiate labor contracts that call for improvements in productivity,” says New York City Budget Director Adam Barski, whose city just saw an upgrade in its general obligation bond rating to its highest point since the city’s fiscal crisis of 1975. “There is a great interdependence between our city economy and Wall Street profitability. Consequently, we project very conservative estimates as to Wall Street profitability. Last year, it was $19 billion; this year, we projected profitability of $5 billion. That’s the number we use in doing financial modeling.”

Lower bond yields also should help local governments that may find themselves with budget gaps by cushioning the blow for any city or county forced to borrow to plug those gaps. The 5.26 percent average long-term municipal bond yield in March has declined from a May 2000 peak of 6.09 percent and remains only modestly above December 1998’s 4.98 percent, which was the lowest since 1969. In the six months prior to the last U.S. recession, a climb in municipal bond yields from 6.85 percent in December 1989 to 7.01 percent in June 1990 made it costlier for stressed municipalities to borrow in credit markets.

Budget flexibility helps

Slower (but still ample) tax-revenue growth helped upgrades significantly outpace downgrades among tax-backed bonds in the first quarter. Most state and local governments were braced for — and had sufficient flexibility to respond to — a slowdown in tax revenue growth. As a result, the effect of weaker revenues on credit ratings-because of the budget shortfalls that arose in some regions was limited.

Even so, the NLC survey indicates that cities are preparing to take precautions against possible shortfalls. Some reported that they will raise taxes or user fees to compensate for anticipated loss of revenue, while one in three reported that it would be making mid-year adjustments to spending estimates. Cities also are considering diverting money into rainy day funds, investing in infrastructure and carrying over funds for general operating purposes.

Cities and counties have been able to offset a decline in the growth of local tax receipts (which grew by an estimated 6.8 percent yearly in the fourth quarter, down from a peak of 9.1 percent in 2000’s second quarter) by cutting annual expenditure growth (which slowed from a peak of 7.5 percent in the first quarter of 2000 to 6.7 percent in the fourth quarter of last year). A decline in spending limits the need to take on additional debt when tax revenues weaken.

Municipal debt protection remains strong. Tax revenues approximated 64 percent of outstanding municipal bonds at the end of 2000, up from 61.3 percent at the end of 1999. Similarly, state and local government tax receipt coverage of interest payments rose to 1,300 percent in the fourth quarter 2000 from 1,241 percent at the end of 1999. Just prior to the onset of the last recession, a thinner 890 percent interest coverage ratio evidenced much less financial flexibility.

Ongoing economic growth, conservative management, spending cuts, receipt of tobacco settlement funds and tax-base expansion (fueled by revaluations and residential and commercial development) contributed to recent upgrades of Boston, Pittsburgh and Denver. Additionally, strong regional economies prompted first-quarter upgrades for seven cities in the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan region and four in the Boston metro area.

The power crisis effect

Health care was the weakest revenue-backed sector in the first quarter, but California’s energy crisis also contributed to rating downgrades. Seven of the eight public power downgrades stemmed from California’s energy crisis, while hydroelectric plants that receive the bulk of their revenues from California’s two troubled investor-owned utilities were placed at increased risk of debt-service shortfalls. In Seattle, a record low snowpack and service outages for maintenance and repairs reduced power output and led to a downgrade of municipal light and power bonds.

Like issuers in the tax-backed sector, issuers of revenue-backed bonds benefited greatly from customer growth and higher usage rates that accompanied strong economic growth over the past few years. A slowdown in the U.S. economy creates a more uncertain operating environment that will place greater pressure on revenue-backed credit quality going forward. Issuers not shielded from competition are likely to experience the greatest strain on revenues.

John Puchalla is an economist with Moody’s Investors Service, New York.

Tags: Economy

Related


  • Report: Many governments facing revenue shortfalls due to COVID-19
    A new survey of local governments reveals that 68 percent of responding governments see moderate, significant or major financial adjustments as being needed due to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. The State of Local Government Survey, released by cloud ERP software provider OpenGov in December, reveals the gaps that 501 local governments have found across their […]
  • How 2020 accelerated government reliance on new sources of economic data analytics
    The ability to rapidly assess and integrate aggregated, de-identified, user-permissioned data has proven critical to meeting the challenges faced in 2020
  • Revenue realities for state and local governments in the time of Coronavirus
    The number of citizens a governmental entity is able to serve directly correlates with revenues collected. The economic impact of COVID-19 on state and local government revenue sources may end up being a much more prolonged issue than originally expected. The first revenue impact to state and local governments was, and continues to be, related […]
  • Are you letting your CARES Act funding go to waste?
    To any grant or public procurement professional in local government, Dec. 30 may seem like an impossible sprint to the finish line. According to the Office of Management and Budget’s Uniform Grant Guidance, any governments receiving CARES Act funding, specifically those under the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF), must ensure those are incurred before that day. […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • The new world of budgets and policies: Excerpt from IWCE 2020 panel discussion
  • Cities and counties call for swift resolution to Congressional coronavirus gridlock
  • Survey results: Financial uncertainty troubles local government leaders
  • New data visualization tool helps economic developers tell communities' recovery stories

White papers


How a unified HR system helps one public safety organization manage crews, payroll, and more in a single platform

7th January 2021

Your Roadmap to COVID-19 Funding

18th December 2020

The One Where Everyone Wins: A Mutually Beneficial Contracting Method

10th December 2020
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

The latest episode The Young Leaders Podcast focuses on Cyril Jefferson. Cyril is the youngest African American to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Hillsboro, Oregon is pioneering a new #renewableenergy generation technology through a partnership with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

The impact of the #COVID19 pandemic on #telework was swift and profound. Now, the big question is whether – and to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Get ready for the can't-miss webinar on how to kickstart your efficiency improvement plan with Luke Anderson of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Among all states headed into the 2020 general election, which ones have voting populations that are the most demogr… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts in our readership survey to help us shape future content so that we c… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

See how cities different approaches to distribute masks in their communities >> spr.ly/6010GAPLa

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

While #facialrecognition is a powerful tool that can improve law enforcement efficiency, that doesn’t necessarily t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X