https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


Testing airborne vs. conventional GPS

Testing airborne vs. conventional GPS

Many in the GIS industry are touting airborne GPS as a feasible and cost-effective alternative to conventional GPS ground control for photogrammetry.
  • Written by Slijepcevic, Savo; Mochty, Thomas
  • 1st November 1996

Many in the GIS industry are touting airborne GPS as a feasible and cost-effective alternative to conventional GPS ground control for photogrammetry. Some argue that airborne GPS means few, if any, control points must be targeted prior to photography.

Others say airborne GPS is cost-effective because only one GPS crew member and at least two receivers (one in the plane and one on the ground) are needed, while conventional GPS typically requires four crew members and four GPS receivers.

Airborne GPS requires a GPS receiver in the aircraft, one or more receivers on the ground at known geodetic control station points and at least five GPS satellites in a good geometric constellation.

During airborne GPS, the x,y,z coordinates of the perspective center of each aerial photograph are obtained at the instant of exposure.

Coordinates collected are then processed and used in analytic triangulation, the mathematical means for densifying and extending surveyed control.

Results from analytic triangulation are used to georeference stereo models to ground coordinates during the photogrammetric mapping process.

Consequently, when the St. Johns River Water Management District in Florida needed a GPS survey, engineers used the opportunity to kill two birds with one stone. The team wanted to study the accuracy, reliability and cost-effectiveness of airborne-GPS control for photogrammetry versus the conventional GPS surveying and mapping method.

The engineering team had many questions to answer. Would the results from airborne GPS meet National Map Accuracy Standards (NMAS) for 1 inch=100 feet scale mapping with two-foot contours?

Would results be good enough for 1 inch=50 feet scale planimetric/orthophoto mapping?

Would it be possible to produce 1 inch=50 feet scale mapping with one-foot contours and still meet NMAS?

In scenario number one, 12 known GPS points were held fixed to benchmark results from airborne GPS. Points computed met NMAS for 1 inch=100 feet scale mapping with two-foot contours but not for 1 inch=50 feet scale mapping with one-foot contours.

In a real-world scenario, using airborne GPS would have saved 50 percent of the cost of targeting and performing a conventional GPS ground survey for 1 inch= 100 foot scale mapping with two-foot contours. On large-size projects with rugged, wooded and inaccessible terrain, this approach could save municipalities tens of thousands of dollars.

In scenario two, 20 perimeter control points were held fixed to benchmark airborne GPS results. While points computed met NMAS for both 1 inch=50 feet scale mapping, computed points did not meet NMAS for producing one-foot contours. The degree of improvement compared to scenario one was slight.

Therefore, in a real-world scenario, the benefit of obtaining these eight points via conventional GPS prior to airborne GPS would not be worth the additional cost.

In scenario three, 35 perimeter control points were held fixed to benchmark airborne GPS results.

While the points computed met NMAS for 1 inch=50 feet scale planimetric/orthophoto mapping, they still did not meet NMAS for producing one-foot contours, even with as many as 35 perimeter control points known and targeted.

In scenario four, only the four corner points were held fixed to benchmark airborne GPS results in a square project area. The results met NMAS for 1 inch=100 feet scale mapping with two-foot contours.

Therefore, this approach would be effective for mapping “perfectly shaped” project areas — squares and rectangles — at the same scale and contour interval.

If this had been a real-world scenario, airborne GPS would have saved 75 percent of the cost of targeting and performing a conventional GPS ground survey.

The study ended with mixed results. While airborne GPS is feasible for some projects, it cannot be considered the universal solution for all photogrammetric mapping projects requiring GPS control.

To ensure accuracy, crews still need to conduct some type of ground control survey, such as targeting a few existing ground control points and/or surveying additional points.

Targeting existing controls and performing a conventional GPS ground survey not only provide valuable checkpoints for the airborne GPS data collected, but also greatly reduce the potential for systematic, hidden errors, which may not become apparent until the digital mapping is used for engineering design, construction projects or some other application.

If no existing control is available, additional control at selected locations would be required to avoid the risk of undetectable, systematic and hidden errors in the airborne GPS data.

In addition to a good constellation of satellites, an airborne GPS mission requires good flying weather for aerial photography and a good sun angle. The potential for GPS signal loss should be minimal.

Many other factors, such as ground crew coordination, climate conditions in the project area, geographic location, site accessibility, site geometry/shape and size and accuracies, must be considered.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • Seamless Cooperative Experience Saves Indiana City Exponentially in Time and Money
    Significant new responsibility in an unfamiliar spend category didn’t intimidate Jasper-Dubois County Public Library Director, Christine Golden. What could’ve been an overwhelming furniture project for a state-of-the-art, 67,000 square-foot new facility turned into a seamless, stress-free experience through a cooperative purchasing strategy. “Stress-free” may sound like an exaggeration, but it’s the result that cooperative purchasing […]
  • 10 best large cities for fishing
    Across the United States, Americans of all backgrounds—from both urban and rural settings alike—enjoy a mutual pastime: fishing. But while there are plenty of cities that feature lakes and rivers, some large metro areas are better fishing communities than others.  A list created by Apartment Guide considers all U.S. cities with a population of more […]
  • public sector
    Generational differences present an opportunity to reinvent public sector service delivery
    As major technology companies have transformed the ideal customer experience into instantaneous “one-click” services, the public sector has been challenged to keep pace. As a result, government organizations must meet the changing expectations of Americans with faster, simpler, 24/7 services. Government is ingrained in the fabric of our lives, including the water we drink, the […]
  • Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come
    When the pandemic struck in 2020, public retention was hit hard: jobs in local government plummeted by 8.5 percent; state employment dropped by 4.4 percent. Two years later, local and state government jobs have rebounded by about half—to 4.1 and 1.9 percent below pre-pandemic levels respectively, according to a new report from Mission Square Research […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • What “smart city” means for 2021: How digital twins, AI and other innovations drive smart transformation
  • 10 reasons why local governments should outsource all IT: Post pandemic view
  • A call to action: Moving procurement past its pre-pandemic mindset
  • Making deals: Cooperative agreements can help governments achieve supplier diversity goals

White papers


How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Seamless Cooperative Experience Saves Indiana City Exponentially in Time and Money dlvr.it/SSxp95

27th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

10 best large cities for fishing dlvr.it/SSxbSZ

27th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Generational differences present an opportunity to reinvent public sector service delivery dlvr.it/SSxbN7

27th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come dlvr.it/SSnmS7

24th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships dlvr.it/SSkGBn

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making dlvr.it/SSk3H0

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses dlvr.it/SSgBck

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Oklahoma City puts the focus on employees when implementing changes in office technology dlvr.it/SSfyns

22nd June 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X