https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Unintended consequences of changes

Unintended consequences of changes

  • Written by rodwellj
  • 20th September 2018

The interest in hybrids is a combination of concern about the funding issues facing public sector employers following the recession and market crash and the setbacks seen by early adopters who closed their DB plans in favor of DC plans, Nicholl says. “Entities thought the silver bullet was the DC plan,” she says, “but once they see how they work, they believe they may not be the right approach.”

With hybrids, employers share the risk with the employees, which reduces their liabilities. But implementing a new plan is complicated. “There are many stakeholders in a plan design process,” she says. In a typical plan, stakeholders are not only the employee and employer, but also the legislature and governor and the taxpayer. “There is a need to consider the thoughts of each of the stakeholders from their own viewpoint.”

Advocates of change often miss important considerations that have impact far beyond the initial decision to close a DB plan, such as the proposal now before the Washington legislature, says George Masten, interim executive director of the Retired Public Employee Council of Washington and a 19-year member of the Washington state investment board. Closing a DB plan hurts the remaining employees in the plan, because the investment managers can no longer manage investments for the long term, but only for the remainder of the plan, he says. In addition, managers have to keep a larger-than-usual amount in cash because of the lack of new contributions coming into the plan from new employees.

“The more they push hybrids, the more cautious people will become in investing,” he says, which in turn will reduce investment results and increase liabilities on the remaining fund. “It will have a major impact on the board. Good long-term investing gives the highest returns.”

Pratt says that any DC component “puts the employee’s retirement in the hands of Wall Street instead of a pension system backed up by structure and employers.” He says that teachers who want to take full advantage of the employer match put 12 percent of their pay into the retirement plan, along with health care and other deductions. “It’s not sustainable for young teachers who have to pay down their college debt and want to own a home,” he says. “We want to recruit and retain the best people for the classroom. This climate makes it really difficult.”

Good practices rather than radical design change are often instrumental in keeping the best retirement funds solvent, Boivie says. A June 2011 NIRS study of several plans that have remained well-funded throughout the economic turbulence showed that they regularly reviewed their assumptions with an actuary to evaluate investment assumptions, asset allocations, demographic and mortality changes, and wage growth. Then, they adopted a rather simple solution: They set aside funding consistently. What happened next seems obvious but hard for so many to implement.

“If you pay, you’re OK,” she says.

— Robert Barkin is a Bethesda, Md.-based freelance writer.

Tags:

Related Content

  • Ransomware attacks highlight need for adequate cybersecurity
  • Streets of the post-pandemic future: Retrofitting city streets for 21st century needs
  • With proposed plan, Los Angeles grapples with housing crisis
  • 14 U.S. cities named Champion Cities, advance to 2021 Global Mayors Challenge

White papers


How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come dlvr.it/SSnmS7

24th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships dlvr.it/SSkGBn

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making dlvr.it/SSk3H0

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses dlvr.it/SSgBck

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Oklahoma City puts the focus on employees when implementing changes in office technology dlvr.it/SSfyns

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Please take this brief survey and let us know how your organization is managing your budg… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Buying smart solutions: Technology is now part of (almost) every government purchase dlvr.it/SSbj3Z

21st June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid tech labor shortage, outsourcing digital services could provide relief dlvr.it/SSbj23

21st June 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X