https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

 

 

  • Written by rodwellj
  • 20th September 2018

Global challenges

While green purchasing practices are increasing around the world, there are common challenges reported by purchasers that need to be overcome to facilitate further progress. The most frequently cited challenges include:

Sporadic implementation. Government purchasers around the world report that green purchasing activities are easier for some product categories than for others. They also report varying levels of political support, which affects their ability and willingness to integrate human health, environmental and social considerations into the purchasing process. In developing countries, understandably, green purchasing priorities are subordinate to other more pressing priorities such as ensuring access to suitable housing, clean water and energy.

Poor reporting. Procurement systems are typically designed to track expenditures; they are not historically designed to track progress against environmental and social goals. Large contracts covering multiple product categories such as construction or office supply contracts include multiple opportunities to include greener products, but the individual value of those purchases is rarely (if ever) quantified. As a result, it is challenging to know how effective green purchasing programs are or what metrics should be used to track progress.

Pricing concerns. Some purchasers continue to believe that greener products cost more than competing products. While numerous studies demonstrate that greener products can save money in some cases, the perception that greener products and services will cost more prevents some purchasers from seeking or considering greener options.

Performance concerns. Although performance requirements can be defined in contracts, some purchasers worry that greener products will not perform as well as traditional products. As a result, they fail to consider the benefits of greener products and services.

Complex tradeoffs. Purchasers around the world also report that it can be difficult to identify greener products because there are tradeoffs. An energy-efficient product, for example, might use more water or contain more hazardous materials than a competing product. Purchasers are not environmental experts and without clarity on which human health, environmental or social benefits should be prioritized, it can be difficult to build green requirements into the purchasing process.

Global solutions

Like the challenges reported by purchasers from around the world, the solutions to those challenges are remarkably familiar. Purchasers around the world are looking to ecolabels and purchasing networks to make green purchasing easier. They also recognize the value of international harmonization efforts to reduce confusion about how to identify and buy greener products and services.

Eco-labels. The most useful green purchasing tool cited by purchasers worldwide is eco-labelling. An environmental label, based on third-party certification to a respected environmental standard, makes it much easier to identify greener products and services. Many countries have developed their own environmental labels to recognize greener products. The United States government has developed a number of labels focusing on specific environmental claims – Energy Star for energy efficiency; Water Sense for water efficiency; BioPreferred for bio-based content. Other countries have developed single labels that address multiple environmental concerns. The Global Ecolabelling Network (GEN) is a network of 26 environmental labels that meet internationally accepted ISO Type 1 environmental label requirements. GEN has created mutual recognition agreements among some of its members to foster the emergence of global environmental standards. Other organizations, like UL Environment, are also focusing on the need for global standards.

Green Purchasing Networks. Japan launched the first Green Purchasing Network (GPN) in 1996 to share green purchasing practices, develop green purchasing tools, and identify greener products and services. Other GPNs have emerged throughout the world, including the Responsible Purchasing Network in the United States. The International Green Purchasing Network (IGPN) was founded in 2005 to facilitate communication among regional GPNs and the promotion of global best practices. Working closely with members of the global eco-labelling community, IGPN and individual GPNs are harmonizing efforts to define greener products and services and the purchasing practices that make their purchase possible.

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). The United Nations has also recognized the tremendous power of government procurement to address environmental challenges and has launched an effort to improve international collaboration. The Sustainable Public Procurement Initiative (SPPI) is a key component of the UNEP’s Sustainable Consumption and Production program. UNEP is focusing its activities on the tools necessary to scale green purchasing initiatives globally through access to better information and improved green purchasing tools.

Global challenges, local action

Global challenges, including global environmental challenges, require global solutions. Global solutions require local action. Government purchasers around the world are doing their part by buying greener products and services from greener companies. Local purchasing decisions made by purchasing professionals around the globe are creating the economic incentives for a greener, healthier, more sustainable world. Purchasers around the world are proving that it is possible to buy a greener future on a global scale.

Sources
— Dr. Anastasia O’Rourke, DEKRA; United Nations Environment Programme, Sustainable Public Procurement: A Global Review, December 2013
— International Green Purchasing Network, Government Green Procurement: Charting a Roadmap Towards a Greener Future, September 2013;

— Fourth International Conference on Green Purchasing (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), September 2013;
— International Symposium on Ethical Purchasing (Sapporo, Japan), February 2014.

 

_____________

To get connected and stay up-to-date with similar content from American City & County:
Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter
Watch us on Youtube

 

Tags:

Related Content

  • Harrison, Mich. offsets energy costs, reduces carbon footprint with solar project
  • Ransomware attacks highlight need for adequate cybersecurity
  • Streets of the post-pandemic future: Retrofitting city streets for 21st century needs
  • With proposed plan, Los Angeles grapples with housing crisis

White papers


How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Supreme Court ruling on EPA greenhouse gas regulation will impact cities dlvr.it/STBwkw

1st July 2022
AmerCityCounty

Sustainability initiatives take center stage in Florida county dlvr.it/STBvwN

1st July 2022
AmerCityCounty

10 best cities for July Fourth celebrations dlvr.it/STBfHt

1st July 2022
AmerCityCounty

The Missing Link in Cloud Security dlvr.it/STBXNL

1st July 2022
AmerCityCounty

Improving Productivity with Employee Engagement | Aug. 4, 2022 at 2 PM ET dlvr.it/STBCD5

1st July 2022
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Please take this brief survey and let us know how your organization is managing your budg… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

30th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Report: Reforming emergency dispatch won’t be easy, but it’s necessary dlvr.it/ST7kQ5

30th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Three U.S. cities to adopt Bloomberg Philanthropies Mayors Challenge-winning project to combat climate change dlvr.it/ST4bjk

29th June 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X