https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Commentaries


Chayapon Bootboonneam/Alamy Stock Photo

Commentary

Proposed update to Community Reinvestment Act could support neighborhood recovery

Proposed update to Community Reinvestment Act could support neighborhood recovery

  • Written by Michael Halpern
  • 28th July 2022

The Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) is a U.S. federal law designed to encourage commercial banks and savings associations to help meet the needs of borrowers in all segments of their communities, including low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Congress passed the Act in 1977 to reduce discriminatory credit practices against low-income neighborhoods, a practice known as redlining.

Historically, the idea of CRA and its required activities really centered around ensuring that available credit and general banking opportunities went unimpeded in communities in which they operate, including low-and moderate-income (LMI) neighborhoods. The association between CRA and CRA activities and community blight was not a consideration in the original language from 1977.

The national housing crisis and recession introduced us to terms like “zombie foreclosures” (properties that sit vacant and abandoned with inability to identify owner or responsible party). The housing crisis led to a significant increase in foreclosures and bankruptcies, causing great concern for neighboring properties and municipal leaders.

While the original intent and need for the CRA existed, there was an even more pressing need. Communities were faced with significant increases of vacant and abandoned pre-foreclosure and REO (bank-owned) properties. The numbers kept on rising even with concerted collaborative efforts to stem the flow through greater foreclosure counseling and loss mitigation tools. Despite the additional tools, organizations and resources working to reduce foreclosures and vacancy, the negative impact on many communities was immense. Communities needed banks to take accountability for the well documented causes for the foreclosure crises.

I may not have a crystal ball, but I do have a good memory, and history does repeat itself.

There is perhaps one option and now may be the best time to implement it, a proposal drafted at the height of the crisis back in 2010. Federal regulators recently announced proposed significant changes to the Community Reinvestment Act and is seeking public comment through August 5, 2022. The changes look to offer detailed guidelines and clearly defined public benchmarks for evaluation, while allowing smaller banks to continue operating under the former rules.

These are the first significant changes in 25 years. With CRA undergoing an update to language, now is the time to bridge gaps and build policy to curb negative impacts to communities should there be a surge in foreclosures and vacant properties in the future.

I have always been a believer in not re-inventing the wheel. In 2010, researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland put forth a proposal to modify the CRA rules to increase banks’ incentives to provide community groups with loans, services and investments that support neighborhood recovery efforts.

Banks would still need to fulfill a certain number of lending requirements, but they could amass extra points, a clear incentive, for lessening the vacancy and abandonment problem.

At the time, the proposal recommended regulators adopt several changes until the stock of foreclosed properties in the nation no longer exceeds a predetermined threshold. Just as critical, the proposal also included the recommendation to return these changes back into effect if the foreclosure threshold is exceeded in the future. Among the recommendations:

  • Provide CRA consideration under the investment test for REO dispositions (REO donations or sales to qualified community development organizations) outside a bank’s assessment area as long as the investment needs of the assessment area are satisfactorily met.
  • Provide CRA consideration under the service test for the provision of technical assistance to qualified community development organizations in developing guidelines and standards for REO acquisition and rehabilitation programs outside the assessment area as long as the service needs of the assessment area are satisfactorily met.
  • Provide CRA consideration under the lending test for community development loans to qualified community development organizations engaged in REO rehabilitation programs outside the assessment area as long as the credit needs of the assessment area are satisfactorily met.
  • Redistribute the weight of the lending, investment and service tests to emphasize investment and service activities. Lending should still be an important component, but an intensified focus on investment and service activities will address the immediate needs for community stabilization and longer-term reinvestment.

Soon after the regulators announcement of the proposed significant changes to the CRA, the White House announced their Housing Supply Action Plan. The stated goal is “to ease the burden of housing costs over time, by boosting the supply of quality housing in every community.” The plan includes “legislative and administrative actions that will help close America’s housing supply shortfall in five years, starting with the creation and preservation of hundreds of thousands of affordable housing units in the next three years.”

Included in the Housing Supply Action Plan are strategies to direct REO properties to owner-occupants and mission-driven entities and away from large investors. An aspect included in the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland proposal. Here too, an opportunity exists to incentivize banking entities to deliver what a community needs—homeowners and owner occupied properties.

While the original intent of the CRA should always be in the forefront, updating CRA regulations to bridge gaps and consider lessons learned during the foreclosure crisis should also be of top priority. Learning from the past is critical to mitigating negative consequences in the future. The regulators should re-visit the 2010 proposal and give it strong consideration.

Furthermore, the housing needs of Americans are changing in respect to location, amount to spend and type of home, as evidenced with the President’s proposal. Allowing communities and banks flexibility to extend financing to meet the new needs of homeowners and communities will certainly reduce the vacant and abandoned properties in many communities across the nation.

Michael Halpern is president of MuniReg LLC an administrator of registration programs for municipal governments. Prior to founding MuniReg, he spent 18 years at Safeguard Properties, the nation’s largest mortgage field services company, where he served as director of community initiatives. Halpern is a well-known expert in the various aspects of “zombie foreclosures,” abandoned properties and neighborhood blight, and has presented at more than 20 different state code enforcement association events along with presentations to national organizations like National League of Cities, National Housing Conference, Center for Community Progress and the American Association of Code Enforcement.

 

Tags: homepage-featured-3 homepage-featured-4 Administration Commentaries Administration Commentary

Most Recent


  • CRM
    CRM beyond sales: How government CRM can improve citizen engagement and satisfaction
    Private companies know the value of customer relationship management and CRM workflows. For anyone new to CRM, it is a technology that helps companies manage relationships with current and potential customers. CRM systems help companies manage customer relationships throughout the entire customer life cycle, including sales, ecommerce, marketing and more. CRMs help organizations focus on […]
  • Here are 12 of America's most walkable cities with vacancies for renters
    Of the many factors that entice visitors and new community members to a city, its walkability is pretty high on the list. Inviting sidewalk and smart traffic control drives foot traffic to restaurants and storefronts, making the area desirable for prospective businesses, which in turn attracts more people.  It’s a loop that begins with the […]
  • Amid digitization of public infrastructure, cybersecurity is increasingly a challenge
    The digitization of public infrastructure is a double-edged sword: While technology can streamline workflows and make systems run more efficiently, it’s also vulnerable to digital threats.  “The integration of new technologies into the public transit industry has resulted in improved service offerings to customers. But while these new services provide important information and conveniences to […]
  • security
    Note to cities: Watch out for security gaps and hidden expenses as you acquire new IT systems
    Government purchasers need to be aware of the security concerns new technology can introduce into a network or system, says Jeffrey Jones, a national security and global trade attorney with the firm of Lowenstein Sandler LLP. “State and local governments are soft targets for ransomware actors and cyberattacks because smaller government entities often lack the […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • How housing and property conditions can affect neighborhood stability
  • The rocky road ahead
  • Ramshackle house
    Post-COVID-19 property maintenance responsibility
  • Municipal leaders should improve property registries to combat property blight

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Funding fiber broadband: The path to growing communities dlvr.it/SWsW6f

18th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Report: Traffic fatalities from motor vehicle accidents increased by 7% in the first quarter dlvr.it/SWsJFc

18th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Biden: Inflation Reduction Act represents ‘one of the most significant laws in our history’ dlvr.it/SWpMDZ

17th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

CRM beyond sales: How government CRM can improve citizen engagement and satisfaction dlvr.it/SWp9lg

17th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Taking on the heat with tech: Cities create chief heat officers dlvr.it/SWp77d

17th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

2000+ government customers reveal a roadmap to fleet management success dlvr.it/SWng6T

17th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Here are 12 of America’s most walkable cities with vacancies for renters dlvr.it/SWlBkd

16th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid digitization of public infrastructure, cybersecurity is increasingly a challenge dlvr.it/SWh6Ww

15th August 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X