https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Commentaries


Commentary

Viewpoint: Considerations for redesigning public sector retirement plans

Viewpoint: Considerations for redesigning public sector retirement plans

By Richard Hiller — Follow these principles to design secure, attractive employee retirement benefit plans
  • Written by By Richard Hiller
  • 6th March 2012

By Richard Hiller

The public sector remains a stronghold of the traditional defined benefit pension plan. But as state and local governments continue to struggle with underfunded public pensions, their approach to funding the retirement of their employees is evolving. Some of them are tackling the financial challenges by raising the retirement age, reducing benefits for new hires or increasing employee contributions. Many are considering alternative retirement plan designs. One thing is clear: Something must be done about retirement benefit plans for public sector employees — to protect both the financial security of current and future retirees and the fiscal health of state and local governments.

Helping public sector employees maintain financial security to and through retirement has been TIAA-CREF’s primary focus for over 90 years. We have developed a set of principles for the design of an effective primary retirement benefit plan. The debate around public sector retirement plan design will continue to grow in volume and intensity. These principles can help establish a rational and objective basis for measuring and evaluating the merits of alternative benefit designs under consideration.

Plan designs that create a substantial uncertainty that participants would receive adequate and secure retirement benefits should be avoided. Pre-retirement survivor and disability benefits should be included in the overall retirement plan design.

  1. A primary retirement benefit plan should be designed to provide adequate and secure income throughout retirement as a primary objective. Meeting this primary objective supports critical workforce management objectives, including attracting and retaining quality employees and facilitating an orderly transition into retirement.
  2. The plan should be designed to provide full-career employees a target retirement replacement income from all sources during retirement sufficient to maintain the employee’s pre-retirement standard of living during retirement.
  3. The plan should be designed to recognize the needs of a mobile workforce by providing equitable benefits for less than full-career employees consistent with workforce attraction, retention and budget objectives of the employer.
  4. The plan should be designed to create a high degree of certainty that participants will achieve an adequate and secure income throughout retirement, taking into account the following risks:

    • Funding shortfall risk – the risk that the total employer and employee funding is not adequate to achieve the desired income replacement objectives
    • Longevity risk – the risk the retiree will outlive his or her retirement assets
    • Investment risk, including normal market volatility and that attributable to more major economic downturns
    • Inflation risk
    • Annuitization rate risk
  5. The plan should be designed to recognize that achieving retirement income adequacy and security for employees is a shared employer/employee responsibility. Employee participation in a primary retirement benefit plan must be mandatory. Both employers and employees should share in the cost and risk of funding benefits provided by the plan.
  6. Because state and local governments have a social welfare interest in the financial security of their residents during retirement, plan designs that provide a base level of employer-funded guaranteed lifetime retirement income are preferred.
  7. The structures of the retirement program and the individual plan components should be consistent with and support these principles and may include defined benefit, defined contribution or hybrid approaches as long as such are consistent with the previously stated principles.
  8. Defined contribution elements should contain features that maximize the certainty of achieving the retirement income adequacy and security objectives stated in these principles.

    • Employee-directed investments should be limited and managed as necessary to achieve the retirement income purposes of the plan.
    • Investment menus should be limited and include one-choice asset allocation options.
    • Participant investment advice should be made available with no direct separate charge to participants.
    • Low-cost lifetime income products should be made available from financially strong providers during the accumulation phase to allow staged purchases of retirement income and to lessen annuitization rate risk.

These principles offer public employee stakeholders a way forward as public retirement benefit plans are increasingly scrutinized and reconsidered. As stewards of public employee retirement security, it is incumbent upon leaders to act with reason, fairness and a measure of expediency. Public sector employees and taxpayers deserve nothing less.

Richard Hiller is vice president, Government Market Segment, for New York City-based TIAA-CREF. Email the author at rhiller@TIAA-CREF.org.

Tags: Administration Economy Commentaries Commentary

Related


  • Biden’s relief plan includes $350 billion for local and state government
    President-Elect Joe Biden announced a $1.9 trillion relief plan Thursday to combat the COVID-19 crisis and the economic downturn it has caused. In addition to $400 million to combat the pandemic specifically, the proposal includes $350 billion for state, local and tribal governments that would help them to bridge budget shortfalls, help public works maintain […]
  • How Philadelphia is aiming for zero waste
    The city of Philadelphia has long collected data on city properties’ waste generation and leveraged it to improve waste management, but now it’s honing in on the commercial sector too, realizing this will be crucial to hitting Philly’s zero waste targets. Today it runs a voluntary program where both municipal and commercial operations do detailed […]
  • How the City of Fullerton navigated adding candidates to ballots remotely
    This time last year, we were all looking forward to 2020: the start of a new decade and big elections (federally and locally) were just a few of the things we were excited about as we closed out the year. Little did we know, the beginning of the end of “normal” would happen two month […]
  • Signs begging for change
    The 21 neediest American cities in 2021
    Every city has its share of economic issues, but economic disadvantages affects some cities more than others. Is your city among the neediest cities in the U.S.?

Related Content

  • Will digital transformation of city procurement hold up beyond the pandemic?
  • Minneapolis cuts millions from police budget
  • Colorado county’s value-based health care strategy produces savings
  • BhamStrong delivers long-term solutions in uncertain times

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

The latest episode The Young Leaders Podcast focuses on Cyril Jefferson. Cyril is the youngest African American to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Hillsboro, Oregon is pioneering a new #renewableenergy generation technology through a partnership with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

The impact of the #COVID19 pandemic on #telework was swift and profound. Now, the big question is whether – and to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Get ready for the can't-miss webinar on how to kickstart your efficiency improvement plan with Luke Anderson of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Among all states headed into the 2020 general election, which ones have voting populations that are the most demogr… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts in our readership survey to help us shape future content so that we c… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

See how cities different approaches to distribute masks in their communities >> spr.ly/6010GAPLa

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

While #facialrecognition is a powerful tool that can improve law enforcement efficiency, that doesn’t necessarily t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X