https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Administration


Viewpoint: Public private partnerships — coming to a civic building near you

Viewpoint: Public private partnerships — coming to a civic building near you

The need to replace aging social infrastructure is encouraging locals to use public private partnerships.
  • Written by Allan Mackenzie and Frank Zerunyan
  • 22nd June 2010

A variety of public private partnerships (PPPs) have been created in the United States for transportation and utility infrastructure projects, but PPPs for social infrastructure — civic buildings, schools, libraries, police departments, courthouses and hospitals — have been slow to materialize, especially at the state and local level. In large part, that is because of government officials’ unfamiliarity with that type of project delivery method, their focus on front-end costs versus lifecycle costs, lender intransigence, and governments’ long-standing use of tax-exempt financing mechanisms. However, all of that is rapidly changing as the need to replace aging infrastructure continues to drive the use of alternative delivery methods.

Recognizing the huge market for social infrastructure PPPs, several trends are under way. Credit Tenant Lease lenders and small infrastructure funds are slowly moving into the public market, offering taxable financing rates that are increasingly competitive to tax-exempt rates, enabling government agencies to avoid bonded indebtedness and benefit from the greater flexibility offered by a private loan. A recent quote by an infrastructure fund for an AA-rated municipality was within 10 basis points of tax-exempt rates, yet it provided greater flexibility, lower front-end costs and greater ease of issuance.

Also, major infrastructure capital firms, such as Macquarie Capital Group, are examining methods of streamlining the PPP process for smaller municipal projects to attract more overseas lenders. Without such action, PPP’s front-end processing and documentation costs would render many smaller projects both infeasible and unattractive to major overseas lenders most familiar with funding such projects.

While a greater number of financing options are becoming available, more government agencies are considering lifecycle costs as a critical factor in selecting a project delivery model. PPPs tend to cost less over the project’s lifecycle because long-term performance is emphasized over front-end costs, unlike in conventional design/bid/build delivery, and the private sector bears much of the operating and capital replacement risk. In fact, a 2000 study — “Value for Money Drivers in the Private Finance Initiative” from Arthur Andersen and Enterprise LSE, commissioned by the Treasury Taskforce and the London Office of Government Commerce — showed lifecycle savings of 17 percent over conventional projects.

Budget and schedule adherence is another benefit. A UK National Audit Study report showed that 73 percent of conventional projects were delivered over budget, and 70 percent were late, whereas 22 percent of PPP projects were over budget and 24 percent were late.

Finally, states, such as California, are legislating to open the field to integrated project delivery models, and public agencies, increasingly aware of the emerging trend and market sector, are more open to solicit design, build, finance, operate and maintain bids for social infrastructure. One of the benefits of the structure is having a single point of accountability, in that the private sector project sponsor bears responsibility for all the elements and includes in its initial bid the project’s lifecycle costs.

Conventional delivery methods have one or more designers, a builder, a financier and a number of operational contractors, none of whom bear any responsibility for the other’s work because each of them contracts separately with the government client. Also, the private sector can assist the public sector under exclusivity agreements until a clear project is defined, entitled, committed and funded, at which time the public sector’s front-end costs can be reimbursed.

With huge infrastructure deficits, both public and private sectors need to look for cost-effective and timely methods of designing and building social infrastructure. PPPs can be one such method as long as an open and true partnership is developed between the sectors.

What do you think? Tell us in the comment box below.

Allan Mackenzie and Frank Zerunyan are partners in P3 Solutions Group, a Los Angeles-based integrated P3 delivery organization emphasizing the development and financing of social infrastructure. Zerunyan also is an adjunct associate professor at the University of Southern California, School of Policy Planning and Development.

Related Stories

  • 6 keys to public-private partnerships
  • Bridging the gap
  • Stimulating partnerships
Tags: Administration Economy Public Works & Utilities

Related


  • City of Tucson launches citywide campaign to improve curbside recycling
    The City of Tucson’s Environmental and General Services Department (EGSD) has launched The Recycling Partnership’s Feet on the Street cart tagging recycling initiative —a community wide initiative to improve the quality of recycling in single-stream curbside recycling bins by providing residents personalized and real-time curbside recycling education and feedback. This new initiative will help the City achieve its 50% […]
  • Senate American Rescue Plan includes more than $60 million in direct aid for counties
    The U.S. Senate’s version of the 2021 American Rescue Plan maintains the $350 billion in state and local aid that was in the House bill, including $60.1 billion in direct aid to counties. The U.S. Senate begin debating its version March 4. The House of Representatives passed its version of the $1.9 trillion bill Feb. […]
  • Revenue and zoning evolution prepares Seattle for an autonomous vehicle future
    Although autonomous vehicles (AVs) are not fully ready for deployment, history provides strong incentive to begin planning for its implementation now. In the early 20th century, the growth of the automobile erupted faster than regulators could have imagined with far-reaching consequences. Although cars eventually helped fulfill promises of economic growth, middle-class jobs, and on-demand mobility, […]
  • A video surveillance camera and sign warning about CCTV being in operation
    All activities monitored: The 10 most surveilled major cities in the U.S.
    Public close-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, or public video surveillance camera, hold multiple benefits for cities. They can help reduce crimes around public areas, buildings and roads, and with the increasing deployment of smart sensors and 5G, these cameras will be able to utilize the Internet of Things (IoT) to accomplish much more in the future. […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Texas AG sues capital city, county over enforcing mask mandate
  • How cities and states can benefit from Biden’s infrastructure, climate proposals
  • ASCE releases 2021 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure
  • Small city, big impact: why economic development is the best tool to tackle COVID-19

White papers


How-to Tips to Prepare for Your Summer Construction Projects

5th April 2021

How to Procure an eProcurement System that Generates More Value from Your Budget

1st April 2021

The Technology Solutions Vital to Clerk Productivity in Our Post-Pandemic Communities

18th March 2021
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Georgia city moves to automated trash collection dlvr.it/RxX5Rl

12th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

The Community Game Changer: Library Outsourcing dlvr.it/RxLd6r

9th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Cooperative contracts can be an entryway for small and diverse companies to successfully compete for government sal… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

9th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Electric slide: Mayors form collaborative organization to purchase electric vehicles for cities dlvr.it/RxGsHY

8th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Celebrating the unsung heroes of the COVID-19 pandemic: Procurement professionals dlvr.it/RxGsG2

8th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Expanding opportunities: Nebraska’s bold procurement Concierge Program dlvr.it/RxGpyr

8th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

All activities monitored: The 10 most surveilled major cities in the U.S. dlvr.it/RxCKzy

7th April 2021
AmerCityCounty

Denver anticipates autonomous vehicles with cross-agency, cross-sector collaborative planning dlvr.it/RxC1dP

7th April 2021

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X