https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE Expo
    • Calendar of Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Public Safety


A Crash Synopsis

A Crash Synopsis

In 1985, the U.S. Department of State's Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DOS) published the original vehicle test barrier methods SD-STD-02.01 to assess
  • Written by David Dickinson
  • 1st October 2007

In 1985, the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DOS) published the original vehicle test barrier methods — SD-STD-02.01 — to assess the crash performance of perimeter barriers and gates. Since then, events such as the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and 9/11 have led to a revamp of vehicle barrier test standards to address a broader spectrum of conditions, including vehicle types, attack velocities and acceptable penetration distances.

Originally, in order to be certified by the DOS, vehicle barriers had to be tested by an independent crash test facility. Certification was based on speed and penetration ratings. “K” indicated vehicle speed during the crash test; and “L” indicated the maximum allowed penetration of the barrier by the vehicle.

For test purposes, K12 denoted a speed of up to 50 mph, and L3 (the highest penetration rating) denoted a penetration of 3 ft. or less. Other ratings included: K8 = 40 mph; K4 = 30 mph; L2 = 3 ft. to 20 ft.; and L1 = 20 ft. to 50 ft. Penetration levels were set at 3 ft. (1 m), 20 ft. (6 m) and 50 ft. (15 m), measured from the point of attack to the final resting place.

In 2005, the standard was revised to eliminate all penetration levels except the 3 ft. (1 m) standard. Since it was determined that the cargo beds often went beyond the front of the vehicle in a crash, the bureau also updated the way the test was to be conducted. They specified what the payload should be — 55 gallon steel drums filled with soil and strapped together — and how to measure the penetration and distance from the inside of the barrier to the front of the cargo bed.

Importantly, it was recognized that different types of trucks use different platforms, which would affect results. So, the new DOS test standard requires the use of pick-ups, medium-sized trucks and trucks that haul heavy goods. As a result, today’s buyer of anti-terrorist barriers, bollards, gates and barricades is able to select the device most appropriate for the facility with a defined vehicle threat.

A quick physics lesson

A vehicle moving toward a barricade has a certain kinetic energy, which is the major measure of how much “hitting power” it possesses. Mathematically, kinetic energy is derived from the vehicle velocity acceleration and its mass. On impact, some of this energy is converted to heat, sound and permanent deformation of the vehicle. The barricade must absorb the remainder of this energy if the vehicle is to be stopped.

The amount of remaining energy varies depending on many factors, primarily the velocity of the vehicle at the moment of impact. The amount of kinetic energy posed by a vehicle changes as the square of its velocity. For example, a vehicle moving at 50 mph has 25 times as much kinetic energy as it would at 10 mph. Thus, an armored car weighing 30 times as much as a Toyota Corolla and moving at 10 mph would have less hitting power than the Toyota moving at 60 mph.

Because of the relationship of velocity to the total kinetic energy possessed by the vehicle, every effort must be made by the security engineer to force a vehicle to slow down before it reaches the barricade. The most frequently used technique is to require a sharp turn immediately in front of the barrier. When vehicle speed is reduced by 50 percent, the hitting power is reduced by four times. If the speed is reduced by two-thirds, the force of impact will be reduced by nine times.

The accompanying sidebar, “Impact Condition Designations,” puts everything together.

Note some of the differences. Most importantly, the new designations actually make some sense in that a car designation starts with a “C,” the pick-up is designated as a “P,” the medium duty truck gets an “M” and the heavy goods vehicle is labeled an “H.” The number following the letter is the speed, measured in mph. Thus, a “40” means the vehicle was tested at 38.0 to 46.9 mph. An H30 designation thus defines a heavy goods vehicle traveling at approximately 30 mph.

As a result, it is quite easy to determine the condition designation:

Car – C40, C50 and C60

Pick-up – P40, P50 and P60

Medium duty truck – M30, M40 and M50

Heavy goods – H30, H40 and H50

What is the difference?

It’s easiest to show the difference in designations with an example. For instance, the Delta DSC501 is presently rated as a K54-certified barrier. That means it has been tested to stop a 65,000-pound truck traveling at 50 mph dead in its tracks. That also means it took on 5.4 million foot-pounds. Under the new system, the DSC501 would be designated as an H50.

Note that these are not yet ASTM standards, but the nomenclatures are starting to be used nonetheless. Therefore, if you happen to come across them, you will know what they are in relation to the former designations.


About the Author

David Dickinson is senior vice president of Delta Scientific.

Standards for Impact Condition Designations

Four types of vehicles are defined:

  1. Small Passenger Car: The car must have been manufactured in the last 10 years and weigh 2430 +/- 50 pounds (1100 +/- 22 kg).

  2. Pickup Truck: The truck must be a ¾-ton model, manufactured within the last 10 years and weigh 5070 +/- 100 pounds (2300 +/-46 kg).

  3. Medium Duty Truck: This vehicle must have a diesel engine with a vehicle mass of 15,000 +/- 300 pounds (6800 +/- 136 kg).

  4. Heavy Goods Vehicle: This must be a tandem axle dump truck or tandem axle with drop axle truck, tested at 65,000 +/- 1300 pounds (29,500 +/- 590 kg).

While defining the types of vehicles, the bureau also established new penetration ratings:

  • P1 Less than or equal to 3.3 feet (1 m)

  • P2 3.31 to 23 feet (1.01 to 7 m)

  • P3 23.1 to 98.4 feet (7.01 to 30 m)

  • P4 98 feet + (30 m +)

Tags: Public Safety

Most Recent


  • Homelessness
    Report: Police response to homelessness is inherently punitive
    Clearing encampments and arresting those living on the streets might temporarily remove homelessness from the public eye, but it doesn’t help unhoused residents retain housing or recover their longterm stability. Even so, a new policy brief from the researchers behind Boston University’s annual Menino Survey of Mayors finds the majority of American cities still rely […]
  • crisis
    Navigating crises with confidence: Five ways strategic plans support crisis response
    Some crises are short-lived, barging through our lives and routines, and before we can get a sense of what’s happened, we’re left dealing with the aftermath. But many crises build slowly, with many early warning signs, and once they’vehit their breaking point, panic and uncertainty overwhelm the ability of leaders to think clearly and mitigate […]
  • Electric scooter
    Research highlights safety tradeoffs of electric scooter speed limiters
    Since the first shared electric scooter program was launched in the United States five years ago, they’ve swarmed cities across the country due to their inexpensive cost, clean energy output and versatility as a last-mile transportation option. As their popularity has grown, regulating their usage on public roadways and streets has arisen as a complex […]
  • zero trust
    Zero trust is a great strategy but a terrible name
    The monthly town hall meeting was going well until they got to the agenda item called “zero trust.” What was to be a routine request for additional funding to implement a zero-trust environment quickly became one of confusion and misunderstanding. Trust in government at all levels has continued its downward spiral over the years. So, […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • How governments can keep employees safe as they return to work
  • Preventing cyber-attacks needs to be a priority for local governments
  • Building community and officer wellness through data sharing
  • California city combines advanced technology with dedicated public safety team for comprehensive emergency management

White papers


5 reasons why Plan Examiners need Objective Trapeze

30th May 2023

7 Permitting & Licensing Fails Slowing Community Growth

24th May 2023

The Secret Ingredient to Local Government Employee Retention

23rd May 2023
view all

Webinars


How to Centralize and Build a Grants Management Process at your Organization

24th May 2023

Making Permitting Easier: What We’ve Learned Helping America’s Largest Cities Improve Their Permitting Process

16th May 2023

Digital Property Tax Collection: Tales from the Trenches of Modernization

16th May 2023
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


10 best suburbs for city-like living

1st June 2023

Gallery: Annual index ranks America’s top performing cities; most are in the West

30th May 2023

Gallery: Top 10 American cities for seasonal and summer jobs

25th May 2023
view all

Twitter


Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.