https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

issue_20070101


FEC Collects Record $6.2 Million in Civil Penalties

FEC Collects Record $6.2 Million in Civil Penalties

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) reports that it has collected civil penalties of more than $6.2 million in 2006, more than doubling the total amount
  • Written by American City & County Administrator
  • 19th January 2007

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) reports that it has collected civil penalties of more than $6.2 million in 2006, more than doubling the total amount of penalties of any other single year in the agency’s 31-year history.

Since the FEC opened its doors in 1975, it has had 49 enforcement cases with penalties over $100,000–12 of these cases (nearly one out of every four) were concluded in 2006.

The FEC says its performance this year sends a strong message that while the agency encourages voluntary compliance, it also will seek significant civil penalties when it uncovers serious violations of federal election laws.

Among the major cases completed in 2006 was the $3.8 million penalty paid by Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac)–the largest civil penalty in FEC history. The FEC found that Freddie Mac had illegally contributed to political committees using corporate funds and used other company resources to facilitate additional contributions.Large penalties were obtained against other corporations and individuals who organized contribution reimbursement schemes or illegally used corporate resources for political purposes.

The FEC also settled cases against three 527 groups who agreed to pay almost $630,000 in penalties for failing to register and file reports with the FEC during the 2004 presidential campaign.

In 2006, the FEC closed 315 matters (including Administrative Fines and Alternative Dispute Resolution cases), the largest number since 2001. The FEC closed cases more quickly with higher penalties than ever before. Even as penalties have risen, the average time required to complete a case, from the time a complaint is filed until the case is closed, declined by nearly one third from earlier years. Over 85% of the FEC’s cases are now closed within two years, the fastest and most efficient processing of complaints in the agency’s history.

In addition to these enforcement results, the FEC issued 25 Advisory Opinions in 2006 offering guidance to political committees and candidates on a variety of key issues, and instituted an expedited process for handling time-sensitive requests. The FEC also completed 7 regulatory rulemakings in 2006, a time- and resource-intensive process, and issued 16 final audit reports on campaign committees, PACs, and parties.

The FEC proposed several new procedural initiatives that will improve responsiveness and transparency in the agency’s operations. Among these were proposals to permit oral hearings in certain enforcement cases, to clarify and encourage self-reporting of violations, to offer guidance on disclosure efforts including descriptions for the purpose of disbursements, and to outline the requirements to show “best efforts” to obtain and report financial information by treasurers of committees.

The FEC received and processed nearly 78,000 financial filings in 2006, the equivalent of 3.9 million pages of financial data, disclosing about $2.7 billion in spending related to federal elections.

The FEC Web site (www.fec.gov) received nearly 3.8 million visits in 2006 while recording more than 106 million page hits.

In addition to the standard enforcement process originally created in the Federal Election Campaign Act, Congress added an Alternative Dispute Resolution program that seeks more flexible solutions for simple violations by employing a mediation process, along with an Administrative Fines Program that employs specific published penalties for late filing and failure to file disclosure reports. The total in civil penalties collected by the FEC in 2006 was $6,262,052, with $5,925,800 from enforcement cases; $136,299 through its Alternative Dispute Resolution program; and $201,953 from administrative fines.

Tags: ar issue_20070101 mag

Most Recent


  • What’s my truck worth?
    Truck Value VIN Decoding & Make/Year/Model Lookup
  • FEC Collects Record $6.2 Million in Civil Penalties
    Calendar of events
    A list of NIGP courses, conferences and webinars for NIGP members held in December 2012 and January 2013.
  • FEC Collects Record $6.2 Million in Civil Penalties
    UPPCC new certifications
    The Universal Public Purchasing Certification Council announces that 208 individuals successfully completed the spring 2012 UPPCC certification examinations administered in May 2012.
  • FEC Collects Record $6.2 Million in Civil Penalties
    Performance data on the latest certification exams
    The UPPCC has released key performance data from the May 2012 examinations.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • FEC Collects Record $6.2 Million in Civil Penalties
    Number of contracting professionals on the rise
  • FEC Collects Record $6.2 Million in Civil Penalties
    FBI employee sentenced to probation for accepting cruise
  • FEC Collects Record $6.2 Million in Civil Penalties
    GSA names Brasseux deputy administrator
  • FEC Collects Record $6.2 Million in Civil Penalties
    Auction delivers two-year power pact to Texas community

White papers


Digital Government Service Delivery – A Guide for Buyers

23rd February 2023

Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022
view all

Webinars


Future-proof Your State and Local Government Finance: 5 Key Trends for 2023

6th February 2023

How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


Gallery: America’s top 10 bicycle-friendly cities

20th March 2023

Gallery: Top 10 hardest working American cities

8th March 2023

Gallery: Top 10 least expensive American metro areas

24th February 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

St. Louis Communities Boost Great Energy Savings dlvr.it/SlFyV0

21st March 2023
AmerCityCounty

How Can Public Sector Best Tackle Their Unique Storage Needs? dlvr.it/SlFxXk

21st March 2023
AmerCityCounty

Gallery: America’s top 10 bicycle-friendly cities dlvr.it/SlCWWk

20th March 2023
AmerCityCounty

Is your agency’s procurement team sidelined during the infrastructure procurement process? dlvr.it/SlC0VM

20th March 2023
AmerCityCounty

The importance of building relationships: 2022 Exemplary Public Servant Molly McLoughlin dlvr.it/SlBcmr

20th March 2023
AmerCityCounty

Business group works to help Hispanic-owned enterprises get their share of public sector contracts dlvr.it/Sl361G

17th March 2023
AmerCityCounty

State and local leaders can alleviate the burden on public safety personnel by tackling three workforce trends dlvr.it/Sl0ZZX

16th March 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.