https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

issue_20041001


Beware of “Bundling”

Beware of “Bundling”

Ever wonder why government transportation projects seldom get done on time, and the price for completion keeps going up and up? Getting tired of the propositions
  • Written by Beau Grant
  • 28th October 2004

Ever wonder why government transportation projects seldom get done on time, and the price for completion keeps going up and up? Getting tired of the propositions on the ballot for additional funding to finish the tunnel, freeway or light rail system? One of the major reasons for this common phenomenon is the inequitable, unethical bundling of transportation design and general consultant contracts.

A general design consultant contract involves the development and coordination of the design up to and through construction. General design consultants are not qualified or licensed to build structures, appraise right-ofway property, perform geotechnical surveys, detect and remove hazardous waste, or dig potholes for utility location and designation. If they were, they would have competed for and been awarded a design/build contract or a contract for the privatization of the transportation project.

Unfortunately, over the past 10 years, there has been an alarming trend in government transportation design and general consultant contracts to bundle all the tasks mentioned above under an existing contract, without appropriate design/build or privatization contract competition.

Following are two classic examples of illegal and noncompetitive bundling currently occurring in the Southwest. One is a $100,000 general design consultant contract for a metro light rail project that has received approximately 10 modifications and grown to approximately $25 million prior to the start of construction.

The other is a general consultant contract for a freeway project that was awarded for a five-year period for a stated $14 million, which is now in its tenth year (without competition) having spent approximately $50 million.

Amazingly, there is a proposition for a sales tax on the November 2004 ballot to provide further funding. How did this happen? Why hasn’t it been stopped? Who’s responsible?

In my opinion, one of the most obvious reasons is the absence of certified public procurement professionals in the process. In most states, the design and construction of transportation projects is wholly exempt from local procurement laws and rules because federal acquisition regulations govern federally funded transportation projects. As a result, government transportation contracting has been predominantly carried out by engineers, not procurement professionals.

Alarmingly, government transportation officials claim that because they are exempt from local government procurement laws, there are “no laws or rules” that apply to the design and construction of locally funded transportation projects.

It hasn’t been stopped because “this is the way things are done.” I’m sorry to say that government transportation officials and large engineering design consultant firms share the spotlight for this prostitution of the public trust nationwide.

In addition to bundling, there’s a lot of featherbedding going on via the revolving door. Government engineers responsible for administering design consultant contracts leave government service to work for the very contractors and contracts they administered in blatant disregard for state laws that explicitly prohibit them from doing so.

To further undermine the public’s trust, the contract oversight that government engineers were performing has been outsourced and bundled under the general consultant contract. Now, contract oversight (supposedly) is being performed by those same former government engineers and charged back to the government under the general consultant’s contract at an enormous mark up. The public is now paying design and general consultants to monitor themselves.

How can this be stopped?

  • Immediately revise state and local procurement laws that provide wholesale exemption of all transportation design and construction contracting, and eliminate the no rules loophole. Enabling legislation is what gives government officials the authority to spend public money. If there are no laws or rules, transportation officials have no authority to spend public money.
  • Reputable and qualified engineering firms that are essentially being eliminated from competing for work that is being non-competitively bundled under existing contracts need to rise up and be heard. You can and must make a difference—for the public good and for the integrity of your valued profession.
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and state and local government elected officials should require that a formal contract performance audit be performed by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) or a qualified outside auditing firm (that includes a public procurement professional) before any additional funding request is put to a public vote.
  • Government procurement professionals must get involved, ask the questions that need to be asked, and demand answers.
  • Transportation officials at all levels of government need to avoid bundling and featherbedding in order to stay out of bed with their contractors.
  • Government legal agencies are duty bound to ensure the fulfillment of government’s responsibility for fair and equitable competition in the expenditure of public funds and serve as stewards of the public trust.

The deceptive and fraudulent practices of many of America’s largest corporations have destroyed the public’s faith, respect and confidence in the sacred cow professions of finance and accounting, which has resulted in a major review and ongoing overhaul of laws and rules governing how they do business.

Accordingly, the arrogant, unethical and bullish actions of some sacrosanct government transportation officials and large engineering firms, who consider themselves untouchable and exempt from fair and equitable competition, may lead to the same fate. I think it’s about time, don’t you? ?

Editor’s Note: Beau Grant, CPPO, is a Master Instructor for the National Institute of Governmental Purchasing (NIGP) and President of Beau-Geste Enterprises. Readers can reach Grant by e-mail at: [email protected].

Tags: ar issue_20041001 mag

Most Recent


  • What’s my truck worth?
    Truck Value VIN Decoding & Make/Year/Model Lookup
  • Beware of “Bundling”
    Calendar of events
    A list of NIGP courses, conferences and webinars for NIGP members held in December 2012 and January 2013.
  • Beware of “Bundling”
    UPPCC new certifications
    The Universal Public Purchasing Certification Council announces that 208 individuals successfully completed the spring 2012 UPPCC certification examinations administered in May 2012.
  • Beware of “Bundling”
    Performance data on the latest certification exams
    The UPPCC has released key performance data from the May 2012 examinations.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Beware of “Bundling”
    A Green Success Story
  • Whirlwind of Activity Surrounds Procurement Conference
  • Beware of “Bundling”
    To Fly or Not to Fly, That is the Question
  • GSA

White papers


Modern American Perspectives on Law Enforcement

14th July 2022

Reimagine the Employee Experience

12th July 2022

How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Note to cities: Watch out for security gaps and hidden expenses as you acquire new IT systems dlvr.it/SWgth1

15th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

When spending federal stimulus dollars, local governments should consider long-term, community impact dlvr.it/SWXJWZ

12th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

In Nevada county, data underpins efforts to address climate change dlvr.it/SWTGHy

11th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

$52B semiconductor investment intended to rejuvenate American manufacturing dlvr.it/SWPqHQ

10th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

How capital improvement project prioritization helps secure infrastructure funding dlvr.it/SWLQB7

9th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Climate bill lauded; predicted to reduce nation’s carbon foot print by 40% within decade dlvr.it/SWHGQL

8th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Partnership launches no-cost wastewater monitoring service for local governments dlvr.it/SW7N74

5th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Investing in America’s onsite wastewater treatment systems for equity and sustainability dlvr.it/SW4Mb9

4th August 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X