https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

issue_20040201


Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts

Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts

Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts With so many choices, knowing what type of cooperative contract to choose can be a challenge---unless
  • Written by Government Procurement Contributor
  • 13th February 2004

Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts

With so many choices, knowing what type of cooperative contract to choose can be a challenge——unless you prepare ahead of time.

It has often been reported that some of the biggest savings a government entity can achieve come from the efforts of the purchasing department. Buying a particular product or service for less translates into real dollars that can be spent elsewhere. This is fiscally responsible and makes better use of taxpayer money. For that reason, the competitive bid process is law for most public entities.

However, the purchase of a radio system or a fire truck, for example, may take up to a year and involve months of research, advertising in local newspapers, pre-bid conferences, sealed bids, evaluations, awards, document preparation, and contract signing. Plus, don’t forget the ever-present potential for a disenchanted bidder to file a grievance. When productivity is measured by the value and volume of purchases being made, the formal bid process can bring everything to a grinding halt.

The formal bid process is designed to ensure that a government entity get a particular product at the best possible price. The question is, is there a way an agency can achieve this “best value” without incurring the time and expense associated with the traditional bidding process?

Cooperative purchasing is rapidly becoming the best answer to this quandary. The decision to use a cooperative is now as common as the old “make-or-buy” decision that many organizations have faced.

However, the decision-making process does not end when procurement professionals add cooperative purchasing to their list of buying options. Today, there are many cooperative purchasing choices available: state contracts, cooperative purchasing programs, buying consortiums, and even piggybacks on other jurisdictions’ contracts. Without the right information, deciding which cooperative contract to use may take as long as just bidding it out in the first place!

Pool Resources to Increase Buying Power
Cooperative purchasing saves government agencies valuable staff time and money by pooling together the purchasing power of entities regionally or nationally. Benefits also include sharing experiences with other entities purchasing through the same contracts and increasing response from the vendor community. The growth of cooperative purchasing among governmental agencies continues to transform the face of public-sector purchasing from simple Xs and Os to a much more strategic environment.

When buying through a cooperative purchasing contract, an entity does not intend to circumvent the competitive bid process. Rather, the agency substitutes the bid process it would normally use for the process the cooperative purchasing program has already completed.

This does not mean that an entity must necessarily buy from a cooperative—itself a governmental entity— but it does mean that regardless of which program is used, the purchasing practices should be as thorough as, or more comprehensive than, those of the buying entity.

One must do some crucial homework on the various cooperative purchasing options before deciding which programs should be used. There are several key factors to consider in selecting any cooperative purchasing program.

Cooperative purchasing saves government agencies valuable staff time and money by pooling together the purchasing power of entities regionally or nationally.

Review the Bid Process to Find the Best Fit
The first factor to consider is the bidding or contracting process that a particular cooperative utilizes. Make sure that the cooperative’s bidding process fully meets the standards that would be used normally by the end user. Documentation should be requested from the cooperative program showing bids received, bid tabulation, and bid award. This is in contrast to a negotiated “catalog” approach in which one or more bidders’ entire catalogs are accepted without a true low bid or “best value” award having been made. If a cooperative is not itself a unit of government, then the contracts it has awarded may not have been subjected to a public competitive bid process. Look also to see if it is a governing body that approves all award recommendations in a publicly advertised meeting.

Figure Out Who Will Foot the Bill for Handling Fees
Another area to consider is the fee paid for purchasing through a cooperative contract. Since many cooperative programs are staffed by individuals whose jobs are to solicit, evaluate, and administer these contracts, there will be program overhead that must be compensated. The two most prevalent models are those in which the purchasing entity pays a fee to the cooperative or the vendor pays the cooperative the fee from its proceeds. It is a common misconception to think that a cooperative program is “free” when the vendor pays the fee. In this case, the vendor will simply add the cost into the price of the product or service.

The key aspect to review is what services the fee will cover. Are the savings and expertise realized by using the cooperative purchasing program worth the price of the fee? Both short-and long-term savings must be considered when making this calculation.

Piggybacking, or buying off another entity’s competitively awarded contract, is typically an instance in which there would be no fees involved. These purchases are usually negotiated directly with the vendor.

Probe Program Structure for Potential Problems
Program structure is one of the most important areas of cooperative purchasing to consider. This includes the format and structure of the cooperative purchasing program itself. An entity should ask questions about the longevity and history of the program, staff size and expertise, customer service, references, and contract administration capabilities.

Most everyone has experienced the horror of purchasing something from a company that folds up shop and leaves town when troubles arise. Equally frustrating is the dilemma of trying to get problems resolved from an organization that does not know much about the product or service it sells and is not interested in trying to assist the customer.

A quality cooperative purchasing program should be a buffer between the end user entity and the vendor when problems arise. Program staff should assist in resolving problems and be knowledgeable in the products and services sold through cooperative contracts.

Focus on Flexibile Plans for Customized Purchasing
One final point for consideration is the flexibility of the purchasing process. Too many times, entities that choose to go through a cooperative purchasing program or an existing state contract are forced to order an item exactly the way it was bid. This can quickly cause a discrepancy between the departmental requisition and the final product purchased.

Look for a cooperative contract that has bid not only base products, but also many priced options. This will allow for a more customized purchase that still takes advantage of a competitively bid contract.

Equip Entities for Procurement Prowess
When all these factors are evaluated on the front end, the cooperative purchasing programs that an entity will use can be determined before purchasing needs arise. This way, when a requisition for a particular product comes, the list of cooperatives and contracts that will be consulted has already been determined.

Remember, too, any decision of such major significance should be reviewed by legal counsel. Therefore, it is a good idea before joining and purchasing through a cooperative to have the legal department make sure that all necessary purchasing requirements are being met.

Using this approach, the myriad of decisions is reduced to a select few. This way, cooperative purchasing becomes just one more handy option in a procurement professional’s toolbox.

Bob Wooten is Coordinator of Program Development for the Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC) Cooperative Purchasing Program. He may be reached via e-mail at [email protected].

PRO PATHWAY

The Houston-Galveston Area Council (H-GAC), TX, assists local governments in reducing costs through nationwide government-to-government procurement services. Visit: www.hgacbuy.com, or call 800-926-0234.

Tags: ar issue_20040201 mag

Most Recent


  • What’s my truck worth?
    Truck Value VIN Decoding & Make/Year/Model Lookup
  • Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts
    Calendar of events
    A list of NIGP courses, conferences and webinars for NIGP members held in December 2012 and January 2013.
  • Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts
    UPPCC new certifications
    The Universal Public Purchasing Certification Council announces that 208 individuals successfully completed the spring 2012 UPPCC certification examinations administered in May 2012.
  • Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts
    Performance data on the latest certification exams
    The UPPCC has released key performance data from the May 2012 examinations.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts
    Public Defibrillators: High-tech Life-savers or Expensive Gimmicks?
  • Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts
    Lawmakers Act to Preserve Endangered Night Sky
  • Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts
    National Lab Licenses Anti-Jet-Lag-Diet Software
  • Cooperative Contracts Contribute to Time and Cost Cuts
    Secret Iraq Trip Rankles Statehouse Press Corps

White papers


Modern American Perspectives on Law Enforcement

14th July 2022

Reimagine the Employee Experience

12th July 2022

How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Amid digitization of public infrastructure, cybersecurity is increasingly a challenge dlvr.it/SWh6Ww

15th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Note to cities: Watch out for security gaps and hidden expenses as you acquire new IT systems dlvr.it/SWgth1

15th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

When spending federal stimulus dollars, local governments should consider long-term, community impact dlvr.it/SWXJWZ

12th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

In Nevada county, data underpins efforts to address climate change dlvr.it/SWTGHy

11th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

$52B semiconductor investment intended to rejuvenate American manufacturing dlvr.it/SWPqHQ

10th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

How capital improvement project prioritization helps secure infrastructure funding dlvr.it/SWLQB7

9th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Climate bill lauded; predicted to reduce nation’s carbon foot print by 40% within decade dlvr.it/SWHGQL

8th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Partnership launches no-cost wastewater monitoring service for local governments dlvr.it/SW7N74

5th August 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X