https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Smart Cities & Technology


GIS more prevalent in big cities, counties

GIS more prevalent in big cities, counties

Survey details the technology's many uses.
  • Written by Stephen Ursery
  • 1st February 2004

Larger cities and counties are more likely than their smaller counterparts to have geographical information systems (GIS), and the overwhelming majority of local governments that use the technology believe its benefits justify its often considerable costs. Those are two of the major findings of a wide-ranging survey of GIS use among cities and counties by Washington, D.C.-based Public Technology Inc. (PTI). The survey, in which more than 1,000 local governments participated, also details the ways that cities and counties are using the technology, the obstacles to implementing GIS and various funding issues.

More than 97 percent of the respondents with populations of at least 100,000 residents use GIS, and 88 percent of those surveyed with populations between 50,000 and 100,000 residents have the technology. Among respondents with less than 50,000 residents, the percentage of those that use GIS drops to 56 percent. Overall, more than 66 percent of those surveyed use GIS. However, Brian Anderson, a spokesperson for PTI, notes that cities and counties that have GIS were more likely to participate in the survey, and he estimates that only 30 percent of local governments nationwide are using the technology.

The survey demonstrates that local governments that use GIS tend to be pleased by its performance. Eighty-six percent of the respondents that use GIS said its benefits justified its cost.

The survey also provides examples of the technology’s wide array of applications. For example, 77 percent of the respondents that have GIS use the technology to view aerial photography; 70 percent use it to support property records management and taxation services; and 57 percent use it to provide information to the public. Other applications mentioned in the survey include support for capital planning, design and construction; for permitting services; and for emergency preparedness and response.

Despite the general satisfaction with GIS, there are some significant barriers to its more widespread use, according to the survey. More than 64 percent of the respondents indicated interest in implementing or expanding their use of GIS but said they lack the necessary funding to move forward. Meanwhile, more than 42 percent said they lack the technical expertise to proceed. To reduce the expense of GIS, many local governments turn to cooperative purchasing programs; according to the survey, 73 percent of the respondents that use the technology participate in intergovernmental cooperative GIS programs.

The survey also reveals a high degree of willingness by local governments to share GIS data with the federal government for various purposes. For example, 98 percent of the survey respondents said they would share their GIS data with the federal government for homeland security, and 97 percent said they would share their data for floodplain mapping.

The survey was developed with input from the International City/County Management Association, the National Association of Counties and the National League of Cities, all of which are based in Washington, D.C. The study was conducted last summer as part of a federal initiative to improve the ability of all levels of government in the U.S. to access geospatial information.

IS GIS WORTH THE MONEY?

Local governments by size: Respondents that say GIS provides return on investment
100,000 residents or more 90 percent
50,000-99,999 residents 89 percent
less than 50,000 residents 84 percent
Source: Public Technology Inc., “2003 Survey on the Use of GIS Technology in Local Governments,” December 2003.
Tags: Smart Cities & Technology

Related


  • American City & County’s 2020 Crown Communities Awards
    Projects nominated for American City & County's annual Crown Communities Awards are judged on uniqueness, short- and long-term value to the community and effective/innovative financing.
  • Artificial cities could pave the way to driverless adoption
    Connected and autonomous vehicles (CAVs) have a future. That is without doubt but there is still a need to ensure that they will be safe on our highways and to ease the public’s safety concerns to increase their adoption over the next few years. CAVs need to be able to react to unforeseen events – […]
  • COVID-19 and pivoting into a new year: It may be 2021, but did we really leave 2020?
    As we continue to navigate 2021, many issues will require continued tech leadership and support to carry everyone through
  • Updating the assessor report: A new approach
    Ramsey County, Minn.'s new guiding practice is that any dataset available on its open data portal must include a data story

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • 2020 Crown Communities winner: Rock Hill, S.C.'s My Ride
  • Bridging the digital divide by fostering digital inclusion and economic recovery
  • 2020 Crown Communities winner: Harris County, Texas, Precinct 2's ACCESS2HEALTH SmartPod
  • Hi-tech sewers can help safeguard public health, environment and economies

White papers


Discover How Public Sector Officials are Monitoring and Managing Overtime in This New White Paper

22nd February 2021

How to Assemble a Successful Government Grant Proposal

5th February 2021

The Rise of Procurement’s Next Normal

5th February 2021
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Why Tucson is building its own 4G network dlvr.it/RvDxK0

8th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

Key Steps Governments Can Take to Guard Against Malware Attack dlvr.it/RvCr2x

8th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities winner: El Paso County, Texas’ pretrial justice modernization dlvr.it/Rv4GKL

6th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

A city’s innovative downtown master plan sees future in local, inclusive placemaking dlvr.it/Rv3SfM

5th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities winner: Gainesville, Fla. closes Dignity Village and houses its homeless population dlvr.it/Rv1GS2

5th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

2020 Crown Communities Winner: South Bay Cities Council of Governments’ South Bay Fiber Network dlvr.it/Rv10b7

5th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

Senate American Rescue Plan includes more than $60 million in direct aid for counties dlvr.it/RtzvBK

4th March 2021
AmerCityCounty

ASCE releases 2021 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure dlvr.it/Rtvck5

3rd March 2021

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X