https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE Expo
    • Calendar of Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com

Public Works & Utilities


PUBLIC TRANSIT/Commission uses third party for bus procurement

PUBLIC TRANSIT/Commission uses third party for bus procurement

When the Saint Cloud, Minn., Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) needed to replace buses, it hired a third-party transit management firm to handle the
  • Written by American City & County Administrator
  • 1st July 2002

When the Saint Cloud, Minn., Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) needed to replace buses, it hired a third-party transit management firm to handle the procurement. By contracting with the consulting firm, the MTC was able to avoid pressure from the community to buy locally, and it was able to avoid tying up its limited staff.

Like many other transit agencies, the MTC was struggling to maintain transit service using older, rapidly deteriorating coaches beyond their designed lifecycle. Out of its fleet of 32 buses, 28 were more than 10 years old.

When word spread that the MTC was in the market for new buses, the community put pressure on the agency to buy from a local company. “People assumed [the MTC] would buy from the local manufacturer because [it] would be hiring a local work force and paying local taxes,” says David Tripp, executive director for the MTC. “[Yet], according to state law, anything [costing the MTC] more than $40,000 has to be competitively bid. We were keenly aware of the need to ensure the integrity of the procurement process.”

The MTC sought a consultant that could help inspect bus production, develop technical specifications, evaluate requests for proposals, gather bids, provide a recommendation for award, and negotiate the sale. In April 2000, the agency contracted with Cincinnati-based First Transit to manage those tasks.

Staff members from the MTC and the company used the White Book — a set of standard bus procurement guidelines and options developed by the Washington, D.C.-based American Public Transportation Association, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and transit coach manufacturers and suppliers — to decide on specifications before soliciting bids. Subsequently, the MTC established criteria with which to score proposals.

An evaluation committee, consisting of MTC staff members and a representative of the consultant, assigned percentages to each criterion based on its level of importance. Final selections would be based on:

  • Qualifications (30 percent). The MTC considered the manufacturers’ financial strength, human and physical resources, and contractual integrity. It required that the companies’ buses be tested at the Altoona (Pa.) Bus Testing and Research Center. (To receive federal funding, public transit agencies must select vehicles tested at the facility.)

  • Price (25 percent).

  • Delivery (25 percent). The MTC wanted delivery no more than 18 months after it awarded the contract. (Longer delivery time meant that the MTC would spend more money maintaining its older buses.)

  • Components (15 percent). The MTC staff had grown comfortable using certain makes and models of engines, transmissions, passenger seats, tires and braking systems. The agency wanted the new buses to incorporate as many of those components as possible.

  • Passenger seat capacity (5 percent). Three companies, including the local manufacturer, responded to the MTC’s request for proposals. As a result of the selection process, the agency hired Hayward, Calif.-based Gillig to supply its new buses.

  • Costing $4.65 million, the 18 vehicles — all low-floor buses seating 32 passengers each — were delivered within 12 months of the contract award. FTA funding covered 80 percent of the costs; the Minnesota Department of Transportation paid for six percent of the costs; and the MTC paid for the balance with money from its capital improvement fund.

    The contract included the option to order an additional 12 buses by the end of 2005. The MTC recently ordered five buses that will be delivered in January 2003.

Tags: Public Works & Utilities

Most Recent


  • materials
    Public buyers have several options to keep problem materials out of the waste stream
    Cities and counties are taking multiple steps towards sustainability, says Curran Hughes, co-founder and president of Renegade Plastics, a fabric product manufacturer that offers an alternative to PVC (polyvinyl chloride)-coated fabrics. Its low carbon coated fabrics curtail plastic waste and reduce greenhouse gas emissions, according to the company. “Local governments are doing a nice job […]
  • environmental
    Seasons change: Addressing environmental issues takes many forms
    With extreme temperatures, increasing natural disasters and seasonal changes that are no longer predictable, environmental concerns are growing across the world. As a result, government and educational institutions, through their political bodies and leadership, are now mandating and prioritizing sustainability for their communities. The measures being taken, and goals being met, take many forms to […]
  • federal grants
    Best laid plans: Here are a few steps cities and counties should take when a federal grant comes their way
    Part 1 of this report on managing federal grants and funds appeared in the June 2023 issue of Government Procurement. In recent years, Congress has approved legislation giving local governments access to new sources of federal grants and funds. The laws include: American Rescue Plan Act (APRA), Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES), […]
  • sustainability
    5 ways procurement can lead on government sustainability
    A seat at the table.” “No longer a back-office function.” “Purchasing is tactical, procurement is strategic.” You can’t spend a day diving into the world of public sector procurement without running headlong into this sentiment. Conference keynotes, webinars, certification curricula and more have been dedicated to advancing the premise that procurement is at its best […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • How local governments can get ahead of the infrastructure wave: Strategies to mitigate risk
  • Prioritizing rapid restore leads to stronger ransomware attack recovery
  • Ultrafast electric vehicle charging will propel local governments into the future
  • The Colonial Pipeline attack: What it means for critical infrastructure, and why businesses need to have a plan in place

White papers


7 Resources to Level-up Your Federal Grants Administration and Compliance

5th September 2023

Elevator Phone Line Replacement Strategy | A Guide to Reliable, Code-Compliant Solutions

29th August 2023

2023 State of Public Sourcing Report: The Bright Future of Public Procurement

23rd August 2023
view all

Webinars


Grant Preparedness: Unlocking Funding Opportunities for Your Success

10th August 2023

2023 State of Public Sourcing: Taking Local Governments into a Bright Future

1st August 2023

Stop Playing with Fire: How to Manage Infrastructure Asset Risk So You Know You’re Covered

20th June 2023
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


Gallery: Hottest temperatures recorded in American cities during July

12th September 2023

The top 10 Asthma Capitals for 2023

7th September 2023

U.S. cities with the cleanest air from latest “State of the Air” report

5th September 2023
view all

Twitter


Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.