https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


Financing computer upgrades

Financing computer upgrades

In 1998, city offices in Des Moines, Iowa, received a jump start on their technology resources when the city began creating a solid network infrastructure
  • Written by Lindsay Isaacs
  • 1st February 2001

In 1998, city offices in Des Moines, Iowa, received a jump start on their technology resources when the city began creating a solid network infrastructure and updating all of its desktop computers. “Technology had not received any attention in the city until three years ago,” says Michael Armstrong, IT director for Des Moines. “We needed to start over.”

To get the money to make such radical technology changes, the city issued $4 million in general obligation bonds in 1998 and another $1.5 million in bonds over three years. The bonds paid for the city’s network infrastructure as well as its desktop computers and software.

Now, most of those desktop computers that the city installed three years ago are ready for upgrades, and those that are not will be next year. Armstrong estimates that it will cost $600,000 to $650,000 to complete the upgrades, and he must find the money to get the job done and to keep the rest of the city’s technology updated. “We have to find a way of building the cost of technology into the cost of doing business,” Armstrong says. “It’s not part of the culture at this point.”

Des Moines, like other cities and counties, faces the challenge of continually funding the technology that will help it efficiently provide services to its residents. Local governments are expected to spend $39.4 billion on IT purchases in 2001, according to the Folsom, Calif.-based Center for Digital Government. That money may come from traditional methods of funding local government projects, like issuing bonds or using general funds, or alternative methods, like leasing and using special technology funds, that acknowledge the short lifecycle and constant need for updating computer systems.

Annual struggle

In Des Moines, taking money out of the city’s operating budget to pay for computers is not an option, Armstrong says, so the city might issue more bonds to cover the costs of its computer upgrades. “We may do an annual bonding cycle and make technology replacement part of it, but I’m not comfortable doing that,” he says. “I’m not comfortable buying short-term technology with long-term bonds.”

Neither are many other local governments that generally reserve the use of bonds for long-term projects like new buildings or for larger technology purchases with long lifecycles like servers and networks. In Tucson, Ariz., issuing bonds for IT is not an option, so the city purchases its computer systems with money in its general fund. That means CIO and Director of IT Todd Sander has to compete with visible city services like the police, parks, paramedic units and libraries for money; every budget cycle, he must explain the value of spending money on technology, which generally remains invisible to the public. “It’s very competitive, but we’ve worked hard to show that $1 spent on IT [has as much value] as $1 spent on anything else,” Sander says.

To determine the technology needs in Tucson, the IT department, which purchases most of the technology for the city, meets annually with representatives of the other departments. The IT department tries to update 25 percent of the city’s personal computers every year, so the oldest PC in the city is four years old. “If one department just got replacements two years ago, but they can demonstrate that they need new equipment, they might get money before someone else,” Sander says.

After all of the city departments agree on which projects to complete, Sander takes the proposal to the city council. “Routine expenditures become annual conversations about the value of what you’re doing,” Sander says. However, having to take part in the annual budget process can be positive because, he notes, the need for IT becomes more visible and, thus, harder to ignore.

Because the mayor, city manager and city council are generally receptive to funding IT projects, the city has not lost out on any important projects. However, as it begins to provide electronic services to its residents, its funding process may change. “The city is just beginning to recognize the importance of IT for the public sector,” Sander says. “Communities that view IT as a cost of doing business are ahead of us.”

Replacing funds

Unlike Tucson, Gaithersburg, Md., does not have to compete for general funds every year to complete routine upgrades of PCs. Each department funds its personal computer needs out of its own budget, and, after the purchase of its PCs, it puts one-third of the equipment’s value into a citywide replacement fund each year. After three years, each department has enough money to purchase replacements.

If the departments do not use the money at the end of three years, the money remains in the fund for the time they do need it. The process does not require the city manager’s review, and it gives the department heads the responsibility of deciding when to replace computers.

Gaithersburg has been handling its computer upgrades like that since it hired IT Director Barry Smith three years ago, and the system has been working smoothly, according to Smith. “Early on, the city manager wanted me to question every PC purchase, but not anymore,” he says.

Large computer system purchases are capital projects that go through the budget process, but otherwise, if the department has the money, it can have the computers it wants. The IT department manages computer procurement, and it consults with departments to ensure that their purchases comply with the city’s network requirements. “If the departments want something and they have the money, IT will buy it for them,” says Smith. “We don’t limit what technology they can get.”

Henrico County, Va., also has a replacement fund, which was established two years ago as an internal service fund separate from the county’s general fund. The county had saved money from a hiring freeze, so the board decided to use $1.5 million of that money to seed the replacement fund. It is dedicated for computer hardware and software purchases. “It just made good sense,” says Henrico County Commissioner Patricia O’Bannon. “The information systems we have in place are so useful that you can’t ignore the benefits of funding them.”

The most visible county services, the police and the library, purchased computers in the first year of the program, and other county departments will join the program over the next four to six years, says John Vithoulkas, budget director for Henrico County.

Using a technology replacement fund has made the process of funding computer upgrades run smoothly and has given the county flexibility in determining when to buy new technology. “We’ve seen that, unless you plan for replacement consistently, you will have cost spikes that you won’t be able to handle,” Vithoulkas says.

Likewise, Hennepin County, Minn., has a replacement fund, similar to those of Gaithersburg and Henrico County, which pays for county department computer needs and gets one-third of the equipment’s costs back every year. The county finances its 8,000 PCs that way, and it is able to replace one-third of the computers every year, says County CIO Bob Hanson.

A $3 million bond issue provided the seed money for Hennepin’s replacement fund and paid for an upgrade of many of the county’s PCs in 1997. The IT department maintains control of all of the county’s computers, and each department pays for their use and maintenance.

While some local governments are using bonds and general funds to establish technology replacement funds, others are being even more creative. For example, San Diego has recently entered into a marketing partnership that has generated $200,000 for its general fund so far. If CIO and Deputy City Manager Dianah Neff gets her proposed strategic plan approved this year, that money will be earmarked for technology purchases.

(The marketing partnership with the city’s wireless provider allows the vendor to announce on banners at city events and in its marketing materials that it is the wireless provider for San Diego. Currently, the city is looking for a PC provider that would agree to a similar partnership.)

Additionally, Neff would like to establish a fund that would be seeded with money from taxes and city-generated revenues (e.g., from the sale of geographic information systems data). The fund would be used to develop applications that could demonstrate some savings in the city, and the savings would be applied to new technology purchases or to additional application development.

Making monthly payments

Fort Worth, Texas, used to purchase all of its computers and replace them every few years, but it did not have a replacement fund to cover its costs. That practice created capital spikes when all of the computers needed to be updated, says David Bragg, assistant director and CFO for the Fort Worth IT Solutions Department.

As a result, since 1998, the city has been leasing its 2,600 computers on 24- or 36-month terms, depending on the type of machine. Now, instead of having spikes every few years, each department budgets for the monthly payments on its computers. Each department pays the IT department monthly fees for its equipment, and the IT department consolidates those fees into one lease payment to the vendor. At the end of the leases, the vendor replaces the computers with newer models.

Second only to setting up the master lease agreements, managing the leases has been the biggest challenge of upgrading computers, according to Bragg. “We have to determine which machines to terminate early and which to keep on a few months after the lease [to distribute the demand of replacement],” he says. It is such a big job, that the city has hired one full-time person to pay the bills every month and to schedule computer replacement.

Although the capital spikes have been eliminated, Fort Worth does not have as much flexibility to determine when to replace its computers as do Gaithersburg and Henrico and Hennepin counties. “There’s an element of discipline from an operating standpoint,” Bragg says. “It’s expensive to terminate leases, so we have to keep the machines for the duration.”

Seating arrangements

Typically used by federal and state agencies to upgrade their computers, seat management is now being considered by local governments. Under a seat management arrangement, governments pay vendors to provide hardware, software and maintenance services for each computer at each employee’s desk or “seat.” The arrangements are performance-based contracts that place the responsibility for acquisition, installation, upgrades, training and disposal on vendors.

Seat management agreements give vendors, instead of governments, control in managing the upgrade cycle and the responsibility of providing service. That could be beneficial, Armstrong says. “[Upgrades] would be their headache,” he notes. “We could get our technicians doing more valuable work than buying and setting up PCs, and the city wouldn’t incur the cost of acquiring equipment and the cost of disposing it.”

Whether local governments issue bonds, use general or special funds or budget for computer system upgrades, the importance of planning for those costs has grown. “Local governments have increased their productivity through the use of technology,” says Vithoulkas. “In the future, the challenge will be to maintain that increased productivity and to continue to fund the technology advances that make it possible. The cost of doing business is no longer just a body – it’s a body and a PC.”

For more information, visit the Web sites for Public Technology Inc. (www.pti.org) and the National Association of Counties (www.naco.org), both based in Washington, D.C.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • broadband
    Funding fiber broadband: The path to growing communities
    The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) presents communities with the ability to build broadband infrastructure that has been shown to deliver substantial and long-lasting economic benefits by creating jobs and attracting businesses as well as improving the quality of life for the people who live there. Local leaders need to be proactive and engaged […]
  • Report: Traffic fatalities from motor vehicle accidents increased by 7% in the first quarter
    The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s first-quarter traffic fatality estimates are in, and they’re not encouraging. Around 9,560 people died in motor vehicle accidents in the first three months of 2022, representing a 7 percent increase over last year’s data from the same quarter (there were 8,935 fatalities in the first quarter of 2021).   “We […]
  • Biden: Inflation Reduction Act represents 'one of the most significant laws in our history'
    Don’t be deceived by its name: the Inflation Reduction Act represents the most significant act combating climate change Congress has ever passed. On Tuesday, President Joe Biden signed the measure into law—injecting $370 billion into sustainability and energy initiatives over 10 years with the stroke of a pen.  “This bill is the biggest step forward […]
  • CRM
    CRM beyond sales: How government CRM can improve citizen engagement and satisfaction
    Private companies know the value of customer relationship management and CRM workflows. For anyone new to CRM, it is a technology that helps companies manage relationships with current and potential customers. CRM systems help companies manage customer relationships throughout the entire customer life cycle, including sales, ecommerce, marketing and more. CRMs help organizations focus on […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • NLC releases State of Cities 2021 report
  • How governments can keep employees safe as they return to work
  • Lessons from your friendly neighborhood public service employees
  • North Texas alliance partners with Marketplace.city on smart government solutions

White papers


2000+ Government Customers Reveal a Roadmap to Fleet Management Success

17th August 2022

Modern American Perspectives on Law Enforcement

14th July 2022

Reimagine the Employee Experience

12th July 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Funding fiber broadband: The path to growing communities dlvr.it/SWsW6f

18th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Report: Traffic fatalities from motor vehicle accidents increased by 7% in the first quarter dlvr.it/SWsJFc

18th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Biden: Inflation Reduction Act represents ‘one of the most significant laws in our history’ dlvr.it/SWpMDZ

17th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

CRM beyond sales: How government CRM can improve citizen engagement and satisfaction dlvr.it/SWp9lg

17th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Taking on the heat with tech: Cities create chief heat officers dlvr.it/SWp77d

17th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

2000+ government customers reveal a roadmap to fleet management success dlvr.it/SWng6T

17th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Here are 12 of America’s most walkable cities with vacancies for renters dlvr.it/SWlBkd

16th August 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid digitization of public infrastructure, cybersecurity is increasingly a challenge dlvr.it/SWh6Ww

15th August 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X