https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


The color of redevelopment

The color of redevelopment

Although they can be laden with obstacles, brownfields reuse opportunities are real. In Worcester, Mass., a 24-acre, multi-owner site is being redeveloped
  • Written by Charles Bartsch
  • 1st November 1999

Although they can be laden with obstacles, brownfields reuse opportunities are real. In Worcester, Mass., a 24-acre, multi-owner site is being redeveloped to accommodate a regional medical center. Near Los Angeles’ Chinatown, a former rail yard and mill site is being converted into a mixed-use light industrial and commercial park. And in Bridgeport, Conn., a manufacturing plant has been converted into a minor league baseball park that attracted more than 300,000 people during its inaugural year.

Those are a few of the success stories involving local governments that have spearheaded or assisted in brownfields-related projects. Across the nation, cities and counties have completed hundreds of redevelopments. For example: * 365 projects in California are credited with creating more than 21,000 jobs, stimulating $475 million in annual tax revenue, and adding 5,200 housing units and 13 million square feet of industrial, office and commercial space. * Projects in 60 of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties have created 15,000 jobs. * Michigan communities have reported $458.7 million in private investments and 5,432 jobs stemming from brownfields cleanups. Results in those and other states suggest that brownfields liabilities can be worked out; that financing can be secured; and that cleanup can be accomplished – in short, that brownfields redevelopment can be achieved.

The traditional obstacles

The high price of brownfields cleanup – from site assessment to actual cleanup and re-development – has traditionally prevented local governments and private companies from taking on such projects. As a result, properties remain mothballed or abandoned, draining urban aesthetics and economics.

Unfortunately, cleanup projects are tied to a variety of factors for which finite schedules and prices are difficult to assign. Extensive demands for site evaluation, the need to comply with environmental regulatory requirements, potential liability and the resulting hesitancy on the part of financiers and insurers can add to the property owner’s reluctance to undertake a cleanup.

The Superfund law and its attendant regulations guide public officials and private parties as they cope with contamination at any site – regardless of a site’s inclusion on or omission from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s priorities list. Even with those regulations in place, however, the process for cleaning up is determined on a site-specific basis, giving property owners little comparative data on which to base their project estimates.

Liability also is a critical concern. Even though EPA has moved to clarify the issue, the specter of liability drives site owners and tenants away from redevelopment projects. And it often interferes with their ability to borrow enough money to clean the site or modernize operations.

In fact, lack of financing for site assessment and cleanup is one of the biggest obstacles to redevelopment, according to EPA. Despite the agency’s efforts to clarify lender liability, financial institutions and private investors are concerned that contamination problems could reduce the value of the collateral. They also worry that borrowers faced with unexpected cleanup costs will not be able to repay their loans.

Leveraging resources

Since funding gaps are a major deterrent to brownfields redevelopment and reuse, local governments have expanded their menu of options for filling those gaps. They are tapping into federal brownfields funding, which has become more readily available in the last five years. And they are aided in 42 states by voluntary cleanup programs that offer incentives for local governments to redevelop sites or aid in redevelopment.

Furthermore, many local governments are leveraging their resources to encourage institutional and private investment in brownfields projects. For example, they are: * reducing the lender’s risk by providing the impetus for lending institutions to help companies or projects at sites deemed risky because of their prior uses; * reducing the borrower’s cost of financing by subsidizing loan carrying costs or crafting initiatives that reduce loan underwriting and documentation costs; * easing the developer’s or tenant’s financial burden by offering incentives, such as tax credits, that can improve the project’s cash flow; and * becoming partners by allocating public works resources for site preparation and cleanup, or by earmarking tax revenues or loan payments from other programs to fund specific project activities. They recover some of those costs during subsequent sale of the property or reuse.

In addition to providing financial backing and incentives, local governments can improve the brownfields investment climate by providing non-financial support. For instance, communities can promote “no cost” technical assistance or training.

Redirecting the ‘tried and true’

While municipalities continue to seek creative ways to advance cleanup, they also are steering a few tried and true vehicles toward the brown-fields arena. The strategies include: * Tax increment financing (TIF)
Available in nearly 40 states, TIF traditionally has been used for local revitalization efforts, usually in economically distressed or abandoned areas – the typical brownfields location. Based on the concept that site reuse will create new value, TIF is the most common local financing tool used in brownfields redevelopment. In fact, dozens of cities have used TIF to amass the capital needed for their projects. * Tax abatement
Commonly used to stimulate investments in building improvements or new construction, tax abatement gives local governments a workable, flexible incentive that can help influence private development decisions. * Community Development Block Grant “float”
In some situations, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development allows cities to tap their block grant accounts on an interim or “float” basis. Those loans can be used to fund land and buildings purchases; site and structural rehabilitation; or new construction. A few municipalities – among them, Chicago – have financed brownfields cleanup activities using the CDBG float mechanism. * General obligation bonds
The bonds are used traditionally for acquiring land, preparing sites and making infrastructure improvements – all of which are key elements in brownfields redevelopment. The city’s ability to repay the bond debt can be enhanced by property tax revenues resulting from restored productivity of a previously contaminated site.

Creating the reuse environment As success stories multiply and interest in brownfields continues to grow, local governments will explore additional options for supporting cleanup and reuse projects. Already, some cities and counties are considering: * earmarking some portion of grant, loan or tax incentive resources for applicants proposing site characterization or cleanup projects; * developing a linked deposit program targeting brownfields projects. (Under the program, the local government encourages lending institutions to make reduced-rate, project-related loans; in return, it accepts a lower rate of return on the funds it places with the institution.); * implementing local use tax or franchise incentives for brownfields projects; * channeling some portion of loan repayments from existing city programs to brownfields activities; * earmarking water, sewer and wastewater charges for brownfields cleanups; * devoting money raised from environmental fines or development fees to brownfields projects; or * using small amounts of public funds to “seed” a private, shared-risk financing pool devoted to brownfields redevelopment. Finally, cities are experimenting with low- and no-cost techniques to stimulate brownfields redevelopment. For example, Chicago and Cleveland are considering ways to convey tax-delinquent properties to new owners with viable reuse plans. Other communities are contemplating making modifications in their zoning requirements (e.g., reducing parking requirements on existing sites near public transportation) to provide developers with the opportunity to earn a greater return on their investment.

Regardless of the strategies employed, local governments must realize that every brownfields project is different – specifically with regard to financial barriers and opportunities for reuse. Therefore, no single approach will fit all needs. However, used independently or in combination, federal, state and local resources, as well as incentives, are enhancing project viability.

Charles Bartsch is senior policy analyst for Northeast-Midwest Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based public policy center that focuses on economic revitalization in the nation’s industrial cities and towns.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • NYC wants to convert unused offices into housing units through relaxed regulations, incentivization
    Since the start of the pandemic, cities across the United States have seen a dramatic increase in residents working from home, and in correlation, more unused offices. While local governments are still grappling with the best way to overcome this challenge, converting vacated commercial space into residential dwellings is a clear solution, as it simultaneously […]
  • podcasts
    Tuning into your community: Top reasons why your agency needs a podcast
    Podcasts are more popular than ever. In fact, in the United States, podcasts attract more than 100 million monthly listeners (according to demandsage.com). Are you tapping into the power of the pod to deliver important news on your city or county’s programs, projects, initiatives and community partnerships? If not, you may miss out on a […]
  • 25 of the best city flags flying over American metros and towns
    When it comes to city flags, “form follows function.” A simple, well-designed city flag creates community cohesion, fosters civic pride, and support’s the commuinity’s branding. It also costs less and more residents are apt to use it, according to a survey ranking the best city flags in the United States from the North American Vexillological […]
  • sustainability
    Residents ask government leaders to show measurable sustainability results and triumphs
    There’s a growing urgency for cities and counties to go green, says Sol Salinas, executive vice president, sustainability lead at Capgemini Americas, a service-based company that provides consulting, digital transformation and outsourcing services to many organizations, including government agencies. It partners with organizations to transform and manage their operations by harnessing the power of technology. […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Local governments can expand and enhance access to health care
  • Innovative leaders are making one unexpected change to save money and improve service
  • How municipal utilities in rural areas can attract younger workers
  • Government Fleet Electrification: Making the Transition to EVs

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


Future-proof Your State and Local Government Finance: 5 Key Trends for 2023

6th February 2023

How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


25 of the best city flags flying over American metros and towns

7th February 2023

These 10 American cities are well prepared for a tech-based future

1st February 2023

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

NYC wants to convert unused offices into housing units through relaxed regulations, incentivization dlvr.it/Sj7ls5

8th February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Tuning into your community: Top reasons why your agency needs a podcast dlvr.it/Sj7578

8th February 2023
AmerCityCounty

25 of the best city flags flying over American metros and towns dlvr.it/Sj2RyK

7th February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Residents ask government leaders to show measurable sustainability results and triumphs dlvr.it/Sj1znw

6th February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Future-proof Your State and Local Government Finance: 5 Key Trends for 2023 dlvr.it/Sj1KxB

6th February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Amid spike, federal transportation department launches initiative to curb traffic-related deaths dlvr.it/Shvs31

3rd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Engaging businesses to strengthen your community dlvr.it/ShvZn0

3rd February 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Some public employees face financial hardship; comprehensive pay packages proved ‘a pathway toward economic… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

2nd February 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.