https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


TEA time for the nation’s roads

TEA time for the nation’s roads

With the passage of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, America's road-building community is in high clover. In fact, the money provided
  • Written by Christina Chanes Nystrom
  • 1st September 1999

With the passage of the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century, America’s road-building community is in high clover. In fact, the money provided under the 1998 act, which is actually the latest incarnation of ISTEA, is helping to jump-start projects from bridge rehabilitation to the construction of bike trails. The question local governments have is: How much of that federal government largesse will make its way onto their streets?

TEA-21 has spawned what some people are calling the biggest public works project in American history. Congress has guaranteed more than $44.5 billion in transportation funding that provides $27.7 billion for highway construction and improvements in 2000. The money, which will come from the federal Highway Trust Fund, mandates spending levels totaling more than $200 billion for highway construction and improvements to the nation’s surface transportation systems until 2006.

The legislation also focuses on improving safety, protecting the environment, and creating employment and business opportunities in an effort to ensure overall global competitiveness. “This is a legislative victory for the American public,” says Lee Powell, chairman of the American Concrete Pavement Association, a Washington, D.C.-based organization whose membership stands to gain from anything that involves accelerated road building and/or repair. “Modernizing, expanding and maintaining the nation’s highways to handle the increasing demand is essential to guarantee the safety of millions of Americans who travel annually, and it also helps to create jobs.”

The highway program portion of the funding will be broken down into various areas and cover the costs of rehabilitating more than 163,000 miles of the National Highway System (NHS), including rural and urban roads serving major populations, international crossing borders, intermodal transportation and connections to terminals. It also covers work on the interstate system and other urban and rural principal arterials, along with highways that provide motor vehicle access between the NHS and major intermodal transport facilities, the defense strategic highway network and strategic network connectors.

Funds for transportation spending will be distributed based on a formula that includes each state’s lane miles of principal arterials (excluding interstate miles); vehicle miles traveled on those arterials; per capita principal arterial lane miles; and diesel fuel used on the state’s highways.

Enhancing existing programs

Early indications are that little of the TEA-21 money will trickle down to cities and counties. For example, the Nebraska Department of Roads will receive approximately $347 million and will spend about $60 million of that on city- and county-related highway program projects.

“Our plan includes spending more than 80 percent of those funds on the state highway system,” says Nebraska Department of Roads (NDOR) Project Scheduling and Program Management Engineer Roger Winklehake. “The remaining monies will then be used on city- and county-related projects.” According to Winklehake, NDOR plans to spend approximately 25 percent of its funds on interstate systems, 25 percent on its new 600-mile expressway system, and the remaining 50 percent on the highway system.

Still, cities and counties are not complaining. Rather than looking to TEA-21 to fund major construction projects, they are looking to the legislation to provide money to enhance existing transportation projects. “With the replacement of ISTEA comes the ability for local agencies to improve upon their programs at a more accelerated rate,” says Paul Mullen, program director for Nebraska’s Metropolitan Area Planning Agency (MAPA). “These monies have been identified for use by local jurisdictions for transportation improvements in an effort to ease congestion and move traffic ahead.

“The majority of the funds will be used for streets and highways, including local arterials and collector streets to improve those facilities,” Mullen says. Additionally, agencies such as MAPA are using TEA-21 money to fund a variety of projects, including bike trail rehabilitation and bridge enhancements in an effort to meet their communities’ transportation needs. For instance, federal money is allowing MAPA to complete the Keystone Bike Trail, a 30-mile path that winds through two counties and more than half a dozen cities in the Omaha metropolitan area.

In Ohio, the Surface Transportation Program (created under ISTEA and expanded under TEA-21) is providing funds for specific county-related highway programs. “TEA-21 funds actually grant us a greater rate of return on the monies we send to the federal government, and that’s good news,” says Ohio Department of Transportation Director Gordon Proctor. He estimates that more than $134 million worth of STP funds have been allocated to metropolitan planning organizations, which are using the money to address transportation-related issues in specific regions.

Funds provide flexibility

TEA-21 allows states and localities considerable leeway for projects on any federal-aid highway; bridge projects on any public road; transit capital projects; and public bus terminals and facilities. The act also expands and clarifies STP funding eligibility for a number of programs, including environmental programs designed to reduce extreme cold starts; modifications to sidewalks to meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act; and projects on inter-city bus terminals and facilities.

“TEA-21 is an outstanding step in transportation legislation because, while it upheld the primary program steps in ISTEA, it also improved upon it and added to it substantial resources to accomplish a worthwhile goal – rebuilding America’s highways,” says Hal Kasshoff, program director for Parsons Brinckerhoff, a New York-based engineering firm that is involved in roadway construction. The funding provided by the legislation increases each state’s overall budget by about 40 percent in transportation and highway spending, he says.

The legislation requires that each state receive no less than 91.5 percent of its fuel tax allocation. “Most of the funds will be used for infrastructure repairs, preservations, upgrades of highways and roads, and capital improvement projects in an effort to allow each state to reconstruct and repair such highways,” Kasshoff says.

By assigning more authority to state transportation agencies, TEA-21 streamlines many aspects of the administration of federal highway programs. In turn, each state agency acts as an individual secretary of transportation and assumes responsibility for plans, specifications and estimates, contract awards, related construction and inspections.

Making plans

Nationally, state transportation agencies are working on individual five-year plans to spend TEA-21 money. An annual fiscal plan also is required for any project with an estimated cost of more than $1 billion.

The Michigan Department of Transportation has already instituted its aggressive five-year plan that includes reconstruction and/or rehabilitation of its roads and bridges. The MDOT plan includes more than $6.3 billion to repair and rebuild roughly 7,000 miles of road and 1,400 bridges on the state trunkline system.

“All transportation improvements in this plan are prioritized based on need with specific focus on fixing the worst roads first,” says MDOT Director James DeSana. “We have a balanced program that includes a combination of long-term fixes, including reconstruction; intermediate fixes, including resurfacing; aggressive capital preventive maintenance; and increased routine maintenance.”

“We plan to rebuild an average of more than 370 miles of road surface each year,” DeSana says. “We also plan to rebuild on average more than 280 bridges per year, provide routine maintenance, and add capacity and operational improvements to relieve congestion. Our strategy is to have more than 95 percent of the freeways and 85 percent of the non-freeways in good condition by the year 2007.”

In California, plans include the investment of more than $12 billion worth of TEA-21 funds over the next six years for new transportation construction, major rehabilitation and operational improvements. “California must be prepared to meet the infrastructure challenges of the 21st century,” says Governor Gray Davis. “These projects address the dual needs of relief for congested corridors while laying a foundation to keep California commerce moving.”

The California Department of Transportation says that congestion on California’s urban freeways is increasing by an average of 10 percent a year, costing motorists nearly $8 million in lost time and excess fuel use each day. Consequently, California’s strategy involves reducing automobile and truck traffic, and cutting congestion and related traffic at more than 55 crossings. The state also is undertaking an aggressive roadway widening program.

Local governments are expected to play a part in California’s transportation plan. “The governor has instructed the department to work with regional and local transportation agencies to explore the short-term options that will address the most critical chokepoints,” says Caltrans Director Jose Medina. “It is clear that transportation facility construction and expansion – including highways, rail and other modes of transportation – have not kept pace with the growing pressures placed on our state highway system.”

In northern California, Santa Clara County is counting on TEA-21 eventually to provide money for an ambitious transportation improvement program that involves nine major projects over the next six years. The county will need more than $450 million to fund those projects. (Santa Clara County’s plan is designed to provide commuter relief through interchange improvements, widening major highways and improving safety.)

In the early stages of the plan’s implementation, however, the county will be using “100 percent local monies,” says Mike Evanhoe, director of construction management and highway programs for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA). “We must first receive statutory approval from the legislature in order to begin the design-build contracting technique,” he says. “What we have done is to contract with a project management team to act as staff to the VTA to help us begin the process. Once we receive the necessary statutory approval, we will then move into phase two of the multi-modal project and begin the design-build phase.”

Leveraging the money

While TEA-21 is providing a significant chunk of the money being used for highway maintenance and repair, some governments are not relying on it as a sole source. In Arizona, for example, the state department of transportation is planning more than $875 million worth of highway projects using a combination of TEA-21 money and a voter-approved 20-year half-cent sales tax. “This represents a significant effort by the ADOT staff and our engineering consultants to provide our growing population with the transportation facilities it needs to travel easily in Arizona,” says ADOT Director Mary Peters. To make sure that local governments do not fall through the transportation cracks, Peters plans to meet with county leaders and regional planning agencies.

Some of Arizona’s local governments, however, did not wait for the state to involve them. “We are working on a cooperative effort to receive an equitable return of funds,” says James Bourey, executive director of the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG), which represents Phoenix and the surrounding area. “We started with an aggressive campaign that would allow us to receive an equitable return of dollars based on what we provide to the state in the form of taxes.”That aggressiveness paid off. “We have been gra nted more than $500 million in this region in the current five-year program, and we managed it through detailed research that allowed us to compare what we generated tax-wise and what we received,” Bourey says. Bourey attributes MAG’s success to teamwork involving the public, local elected officials and the local business community.

The lesson offered by the MAG campaign is that cities and counties can tap into TEA-21 funds, provided they are organized and aggressive. Local government officials must educate themselves about the appropriate federal legislation and monitor the funding process. Failure to do so could leave cities and counties with transportation projects that go nowhere.

Christina Chanes Nystrom is a freelance writer in Covina, Calif.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • New York mayor announces city-wide curbside composting program, impacting 8.5 million residents by 2024
    On the heels of a successful 3-month-long pilot program in Queens, New York City has announced the largest curbside composting program in the United States. The initiative will begin following a winter-long hiatus of the Queens pilot, which is set to return permanently March 27. Curbside service to Brooklyn will begin Oct. 2, followed by the […]
  • Phoenix
    Federal funds help fast-growing Arizona city address several infrastructure challenges and needs
    Joe Giudice, public works director for the city of Phoenix, says the influx of new residents is driving a lot of construction in his community. “Phoenix is the fifth largest city in the United States. It is one of the fastest growing cities in a fast-growing region, which influences infrastructure product and service demand. This […]
  • How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient
    This article first appeared on Urgent Communication. It’s a scenario we’ve all experienced: an ambulance with a blaring siren racing against time to get a person in medical distress to a hospital through traffic. What we don’t see is 5G connectivity enabling paramedics to communicate with hospital staff via video conference and coordinate care in […]
  • Shifting city demographics present an opportunity to build coalitions, address inequality
    Minority-majority cities are driving American growth. New York City, Los Angeles, and Chicago, for example, combined for an estimated 16% of the nation’s total gross domestic product in 2021—future projections anticipate a continuation of this trend, and an opportunity to create coalitions to address injustices. Between 2015 and 2020, 22% of U.S. cities were majority-minority, […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Harris County deploys next-generation security in 150 public buildings
  • Public procurement can be transformative for stakeholders in a community
  • The 10 Most Sustainable Large U.S. Cities
  • How local governments can get ahead of the infrastructure wave: Strategies to mitigate risk

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022

Learn the benefits of transforming and automating your Contract Management process

4th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023

10 American cities with a great downtown

24th January 2023

Miami leads the way in FT-Nikkei ranking of best U.S. cities for foreign companies

20th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

New York mayor announces city-wide curbside composting program, impacting 8.5 million residents by 2024 dlvr.it/ShhRk1

30th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Federal funds help fast-growing Arizona city address several infrastructure challenges and needs dlvr.it/ShhBtf

30th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

How 5G is making cities safer, smarter, and more efficient dlvr.it/ShYNcx

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Shifting city demographics present an opportunity to build coalitions, address inequality dlvr.it/ShYMMm

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Spending American Rescue Plan Act funds: A primer for municipalities dlvr.it/ShXzvl

27th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand dlvr.it/ShVhBW

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Managing landslides along road corridors using remote sensing dlvr.it/ShTpL6

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Prioritizing neighborhood infill, expanding transit options increases neighborhood resilience dlvr.it/ShRrFM

25th January 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.