https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


Playing to win the competition game

Playing to win the competition game

Obtaining the highest quality products and services at the lowest possible cost what government official would not want that? But turn the tables: Would
  • Written by Brian Foster
  • 1st February 1997

Obtaining the highest quality products and services at the lowest possible cost — what government official would not want that? But turn the tables: Would you welcome the opportunity to compare your products and services, evaluated by quality and price, against all others in the marketplace? Until recently, public sector officials, with a virtual monopoly in their markets, never had to consider the competition.

That is changing as competition programs are spreading. On the surface, those programs are simple: Products and services are put up against the competition, and whichever is judged best on quality and cost wins.

But competitive contracting programs are far more complex than that. They represent a shift in organizational thinking. For bureaucratic agencies comfortable with providing the same services in the same manner year after year, shifts in organizational culture can be quite difficult. Since change is usually seen as threatening, or at least disruptive, competition programs often meet stiff resistance.

Staffers who resist change believe that they can ride out whatever program is being tried, and they will still be there to pick up their paychecks and retirement benefits. Others in government are skeptical and have grown tired of managerial “flavors of the day.” The skeptics believe business as usual will prevail. However, cities as diverse as Phoenix, Indianapolis and Charlotte, N.C., have abandoned the business-as-usual approach and achieved great success in a competitive market.

In these cities, public service agencies win 30 to 40 percent of the services subjected to competition. The lesson is simple: The private sector can be, but is not necessarily, better. Once public sector managers and employees are granted the freedom to operate in the manner they know to be responsive to demand, using procedures they establish and resources they deem appropriate, they often compete as well as the private sector.

In fact, public sector agencies bring a number of inherent advantages to the competition process, according to Susan Perkins, deputy city auditor in Phoenix. Among those advantages are existing expertise in the tasks and skills to be performed, thorough knowledge of the client’s needs, existing physical plants that are often ideally situated, exemption from taxes and no requirement to generate a profit since there are no shareholders to please. Consequently, public sector agencies need not assume that they will lose in competition programs.

Still, lack of awareness, education and the political and organizational will to take risks often impedes widespread adoption of competition programs, which basically ask nothing more of public enterprises than that which private enterprises face every day: the rewards and perils of the open market. Asking a municipal photocopy and print shop to compete against a privately-run print shop is, therefore, no more outrageous than asking a neighborhood print shop to compete against another print shop operating down the street.

Some governmental leaders who are considering competition programs have expressed concern about negative reactions from employee groups. Yet, in some cities, unions fully participate in such programs, notes Thomas Olsen, director of enterprise development in Indianapolis, who points out that his city and its union recently earned an American Excellence Award from the Ford Foundation for their joint participation in a competition program.

Steven Quick, president of Local 25 of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees in Indianapolis, lauded that city’s competition program in a letter to The Indianapolis News. The letter identified several keys in the competition program, including:

  • no layoffs;

  • institution of incentive pay;

  • abolishment of a wage freeze;

  • reclassification and upgrading of city jobs;

  • empowerment programs for city workers;

  • the release or firing of ineffective supervisors, as well as the retention of better ones; and

  • a system that encourages city workers to communicate directly with city leaders.

“What distinguishes Indianapolis is the hard stuff — increased communication, better (not more) management, empowerment of workers, incentives rather than threats and an attempt to be a real partner in the process,” Quick wrote.

So, how does a public agency make the transition from a classic bureaucracy to a competitive enterprise?

It takes great amounts of planning, training, assistance and perseverance. First, however, there must be strong, long-term organizational and political commitment to cost-effective, high-quality public services.

The importance of a long-term commitment cannot be overstated, says Ed Sizer, contracts administrator for Charlotte’s competition program. “It’s imperative to have long-term commitment,” he says. As part of that commitment, established organizations must be given the time, freedom, resources and assistance to bring themselves up to a level at which they can be competitive. Government leaders first must expose their organizations to the concepts and general approaches of competition programs. Then, they must provide specific training and assistance to those units being directly affected by a competition program.

Also needed are the following:

  • establishment of new group hierarchies and relationships;

  • a guarantee that sufficient time will be allotted for development of alternative business methods;

  • management training in aspects like debt borrowing, tax filing and cash flow analysis in those instances when an agency chooses to incorporate outside of the governmental structure;

  • identification of customers and their values;

  • training on how to assess the competition; and

  • exposure to new technologies.

Sizer promotes employee involvement as a way to reduce resistance. “I would encourage anyone to make sure their employees are involved up front and early,” he says. Charlotte provides program and stress training to all city staff members, not just those directly affected. The city also includes line staff in the writing of Requests For Proposals.

The negotiation process is another area in which give-and-take can spawn creative solutions to problems. The resulting organization is one in which high quality and low price are embedded within the culture.

This new culture brings benefits not only to the affected agency, but to the entire organization as well. “The key is the mayor’s active involvement in trying to create a value system that stresses competition programs and the advantages of the skills and talents of the employees,” says Bob Hooker, administrator for contract development in Indianapolis.

In successful programs, agencies look forward to competing and take pride in proving that the products and services they provide are better than those of the competition.

Brian Foster is an associate with Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC, which is assisting Glendale, Calif., in the development of a competition program.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come
    When the pandemic struck in 2020, public retention was hit hard: jobs in local government plummeted by 8.5 percent; state employment dropped by 4.4 percent. Two years later, local and state government jobs have rebounded by about half—to 4.1 and 1.9 percent below pre-pandemic levels respectively, according to a new report from Mission Square Research […]
  • Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships
    The so-called “American dream” of upward mobility has more or less stagnated: Today, a little more than 40 percent of children raised at the bottom of the income ladder remain there as adults, according to Pew Charitable Trusts, and only half grow up to earn more than their parents. This data points to a concerning […]
  • hybrid technology
    Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making
    There’s one kind of technology that state and local governments covet, says Rob Carey, president of Cloudera Government Solutions. “While supporting multiple state and local government agencies, our team has noticed an increase in the need for hybrid cloud solutions.” A hybrid cloud is the combination of both public and private cloud deployment models. In […]
  • Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
    Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses
    After two years of ping-pong lockdown orders, mask mandates, unprecedented vaccine drives and economic uncertainty, cities across the United States are beginning to emerge in the pandemic’s aftermath, and they’re prioritizing infrastructure, according to a report published Wednesday by the National League of Cities (NLC).  “The new normal, as we now understand it, is here,” […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • NLC releases State of Cities 2021 report
  • How governments can keep employees safe as they return to work
  • Lessons from your friendly neighborhood public service employees
  • North Texas alliance partners with Marketplace.city on smart government solutions

White papers


How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come dlvr.it/SSnmS7

24th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships dlvr.it/SSkGBn

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making dlvr.it/SSk3H0

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses dlvr.it/SSgBck

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Oklahoma City puts the focus on employees when implementing changes in office technology dlvr.it/SSfyns

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Please take this brief survey and let us know how your organization is managing your budg… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Buying smart solutions: Technology is now part of (almost) every government purchase dlvr.it/SSbj3Z

21st June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid tech labor shortage, outsourcing digital services could provide relief dlvr.it/SSbj23

21st June 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X