https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
    • Latest videos
    • Product Guides
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


Playing to win the competition game

Playing to win the competition game

Obtaining the highest quality products and services at the lowest possible cost what government official would not want that? But turn the tables: Would
  • Written by Brian Foster
  • 1st February 1997

Obtaining the highest quality products and services at the lowest possible cost — what government official would not want that? But turn the tables: Would you welcome the opportunity to compare your products and services, evaluated by quality and price, against all others in the marketplace? Until recently, public sector officials, with a virtual monopoly in their markets, never had to consider the competition.

That is changing as competition programs are spreading. On the surface, those programs are simple: Products and services are put up against the competition, and whichever is judged best on quality and cost wins.

But competitive contracting programs are far more complex than that. They represent a shift in organizational thinking. For bureaucratic agencies comfortable with providing the same services in the same manner year after year, shifts in organizational culture can be quite difficult. Since change is usually seen as threatening, or at least disruptive, competition programs often meet stiff resistance.

Staffers who resist change believe that they can ride out whatever program is being tried, and they will still be there to pick up their paychecks and retirement benefits. Others in government are skeptical and have grown tired of managerial “flavors of the day.” The skeptics believe business as usual will prevail. However, cities as diverse as Phoenix, Indianapolis and Charlotte, N.C., have abandoned the business-as-usual approach and achieved great success in a competitive market.

In these cities, public service agencies win 30 to 40 percent of the services subjected to competition. The lesson is simple: The private sector can be, but is not necessarily, better. Once public sector managers and employees are granted the freedom to operate in the manner they know to be responsive to demand, using procedures they establish and resources they deem appropriate, they often compete as well as the private sector.

In fact, public sector agencies bring a number of inherent advantages to the competition process, according to Susan Perkins, deputy city auditor in Phoenix. Among those advantages are existing expertise in the tasks and skills to be performed, thorough knowledge of the client’s needs, existing physical plants that are often ideally situated, exemption from taxes and no requirement to generate a profit since there are no shareholders to please. Consequently, public sector agencies need not assume that they will lose in competition programs.

Still, lack of awareness, education and the political and organizational will to take risks often impedes widespread adoption of competition programs, which basically ask nothing more of public enterprises than that which private enterprises face every day: the rewards and perils of the open market. Asking a municipal photocopy and print shop to compete against a privately-run print shop is, therefore, no more outrageous than asking a neighborhood print shop to compete against another print shop operating down the street.

Some governmental leaders who are considering competition programs have expressed concern about negative reactions from employee groups. Yet, in some cities, unions fully participate in such programs, notes Thomas Olsen, director of enterprise development in Indianapolis, who points out that his city and its union recently earned an American Excellence Award from the Ford Foundation for their joint participation in a competition program.

Steven Quick, president of Local 25 of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees in Indianapolis, lauded that city’s competition program in a letter to The Indianapolis News. The letter identified several keys in the competition program, including:

  • no layoffs;

  • institution of incentive pay;

  • abolishment of a wage freeze;

  • reclassification and upgrading of city jobs;

  • empowerment programs for city workers;

  • the release or firing of ineffective supervisors, as well as the retention of better ones; and

  • a system that encourages city workers to communicate directly with city leaders.

“What distinguishes Indianapolis is the hard stuff — increased communication, better (not more) management, empowerment of workers, incentives rather than threats and an attempt to be a real partner in the process,” Quick wrote.

So, how does a public agency make the transition from a classic bureaucracy to a competitive enterprise?

It takes great amounts of planning, training, assistance and perseverance. First, however, there must be strong, long-term organizational and political commitment to cost-effective, high-quality public services.

The importance of a long-term commitment cannot be overstated, says Ed Sizer, contracts administrator for Charlotte’s competition program. “It’s imperative to have long-term commitment,” he says. As part of that commitment, established organizations must be given the time, freedom, resources and assistance to bring themselves up to a level at which they can be competitive. Government leaders first must expose their organizations to the concepts and general approaches of competition programs. Then, they must provide specific training and assistance to those units being directly affected by a competition program.

Also needed are the following:

  • establishment of new group hierarchies and relationships;

  • a guarantee that sufficient time will be allotted for development of alternative business methods;

  • management training in aspects like debt borrowing, tax filing and cash flow analysis in those instances when an agency chooses to incorporate outside of the governmental structure;

  • identification of customers and their values;

  • training on how to assess the competition; and

  • exposure to new technologies.

Sizer promotes employee involvement as a way to reduce resistance. “I would encourage anyone to make sure their employees are involved up front and early,” he says. Charlotte provides program and stress training to all city staff members, not just those directly affected. The city also includes line staff in the writing of Requests For Proposals.

The negotiation process is another area in which give-and-take can spawn creative solutions to problems. The resulting organization is one in which high quality and low price are embedded within the culture.

This new culture brings benefits not only to the affected agency, but to the entire organization as well. “The key is the mayor’s active involvement in trying to create a value system that stresses competition programs and the advantages of the skills and talents of the employees,” says Bob Hooker, administrator for contract development in Indianapolis.

In successful programs, agencies look forward to competing and take pride in proving that the products and services they provide are better than those of the competition.

Brian Foster is an associate with Hilton Farnkopf & Hobson, LLC, which is assisting Glendale, Calif., in the development of a competition program.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • New York City, New York
    Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand
    Given the reliance on vehicular transportation in the United States, some American cities historically haven’t prioritized being walkable in past planning and or design. But amid an unprecedented shift in the economy toward remote work, those that have are increasingly desirable for prospective residents. A new report from Smart Growth American and Places Platform, “Foot Traffic […]
  • landslides
    Managing landslides along road corridors using remote sensing
    Maintaining roads is an optimization problem. Local officials must balance limited and sometimes shrinking budgets with the needs of their communities to have safe and reliable transportation systems. Unfortunately, the importance of a particular maintenance issue is often judged based on anecdotal information and complaints from the public rather than hard data. This approach is […]
  • resilience
    Report: Prioritizing neighborhood infill, expanding transit options increases neighborhood resilience
    With the threat of climate change looming, cities that prioritize neighborhood resilience and equity will be best equipped to withstand future challenges. Last week, the United States Conference of Mayors and the Wells Fargo Institute for Sustainable Finance released a report highlighting strategies for communities looking to address the impact of the climate crisis. “Mayors […]
  • great downtown
    10 American cities with a great downtown
    From small New England town commons to bustling Southern centers and Western squares, downtowns serve as a city’s backbone. Beyond office space, they’re hubs for social activities, fine dining and cultural experiences. But not every downtown is equal. With a focus on renters and options apartment amenities, a new ranking from StorageCafe ranks America’s best […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • NLC releases State of Cities 2021 report
  • How governments can keep employees safe as they return to work
  • Lessons from your friendly neighborhood public service employees
  • North Texas alliance partners with Marketplace.city on smart government solutions

White papers


Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations

24th January 2023

Preparing Your Community Now for the Next Generation of Older Adults

18th October 2022

Helping Government Fleets Achieve Their Goals

30th September 2022
view all

Webinars


How To: Evaluate Digital Government Service Delivery Technologies

23rd January 2023

Using Technology to Enhance Communications

29th November 2022

Learn the benefits of transforming and automating your Contract Management process

4th November 2022
view all

PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

GALLERIES


Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand

26th January 2023

10 American cities with a great downtown

24th January 2023

Miami leads the way in FT-Nikkei ranking of best U.S. cities for foreign companies

20th January 2023
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Report: While remote work is causing offices to empty out, walkable cities are still in high demand dlvr.it/ShVhBW

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Managing landslides along road corridors using remote sensing dlvr.it/ShTpL6

26th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Prioritizing neighborhood infill, expanding transit options increases neighborhood resilience dlvr.it/ShRrFM

25th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

10 American cities with a great downtown dlvr.it/ShNxXH

24th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

With a few strategies and tools, public procurement directors can recruit new, diverse staffers dlvr.it/ShNnj4

24th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Oakland launches smart loading zone program for commercial unloading at the curbside dlvr.it/ShNkMg

24th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Modernizing government services for today’s resident expectations dlvr.it/ShNGq0

24th January 2023
AmerCityCounty

Report: Technology is evolving quickly, and the water and sewer sector needs to adapt dlvr.it/ShL0B5

23rd January 2023

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.