https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Events
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • Magazine
    • Back
    • Digital Editions
    • Reprints & Reuse
    • Subscribe to GovPro
    • Manage GovPro Subscription
    • Advertise
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
acc.com

Public Works & Utilities


No level playing field

No level playing field

Much has been written lately about managed competition in the area of municipal water or wastewater privatization. The issue has raised passions to the
  • Written by Doug Herbst
  • 1st February 1997

Much has been written lately about “managed competition” in the area of municipal water or wastewater privatization. The issue has raised passions to the point that a reasonable discussion is often impossible.

Managed competition is simply a matter of having the existing municipal work force submit a proposal and compete with private firms. Some argue that the public sector has functioned in a non-competitive environment, and it should therefore be allowed to put its best foot forward in a competitive environment with the private sector. Others argue that it has been putting its best foot forward year in and year out with its annual budget and past record of performance.

At first glance, there is absolutely nothing wrong with putting the public sector in a competitive environment with the private sector. Private firms, in particular, believe in competition as the best way to achieve operational efficiencies and cost savings.

The reason they can offer municipalities cost savings and guaranteed performance is because they have learned to be competitive and efficient. Firms that do not learn this are soon forced from the field.

But managed competition is not always open — and not always fair. It may be appropriate in some circumstances; ill-advised in others. Private operation and management of municipal services is a rapidly growing industry, increasing at a rate of about 20 percent a year. Privatization offers a number of benefits that have been well-documented and publicized — cost savings and guaranteed performance, including compliance, chief among them.

Still, privatization is not for everyone. If your current system works well, your facilities run smoothly, labor relations are excellent and your operations are efficient, why change?

But if equipment is constantly failing, you are more often than not out of compliance, the community is complaining about plant odor, your drinking water has color and taste problems, your user rates are high, costs are rising yearly and taxpayers are rebelling, something obviously must change. Some problems may be institutional, among them lack of creativity, a reluctance to change, a monopolistic mindset, lack of incentives, the burden of bureaucracy, limited access to expertise and technology and lack of training.

The question to be asked, then, is: What is the likelihood that the existing local public entity can be energized and changed?

We are a country that roots for the underdog, the hometown team — that believes in second chances. So, why not give the existing work force a second chance? Given some of the difficulties involved in making managed competition truly fair and productive, however, it might be better to offer that opportunity before opening up the process to private firms. The private sector is not afraid of competition, but a level playing field on which to compete and the ability to create a truly equal basis of comparison is virtually impossible to create. Some areas of concern include:

Conflict of interest: How can the same people who are involved in preparing the procurement document and evaluating proposals submit a proposal? Even if an outside third party were brought in to take care of the mechanics of the process, it would be difficult to manage and ensure impartiality. This must be recognized by the public sector and addressed upfront in a frank manner.

Public sector cost proposal: Are all the public sector's costs included? Is overhead fully allocated and included? Are all costs (direct, indirect and third-party) included or are costs being reallocated elsewhere? Are costs included at sufficient levels, and are they commensurate with levels routinely budgeted by the private sector for areas like training and maintenance?

Qualifications: Most privatization procurements find qualifications and experience an extremely important selection criterion. Even if the existing work force had not performed inadequately in the past, how can it compete with firms that operate facilities throughout the country and possess a network of national experts and resources?

Accountability: Will the existing work force be subject to termination for failure to perform? If it cannot perform for the contracted price, where does the shortfall come from? Workers' paychecks? Taxpayers' wallets?

In the memorandum that serves as the official agreement between a city and the public wastewater facility work force that recently won a managed competition, the second sentence states:

“It is expressly understood that this Memorandum is not legally binding upon the city, nor upon any officer or employee of the city … Nevertheless, it is the intent of the council to commit the city, and of the employees to commit themselves, to the performance of the terms of this memorandum notwithstanding the absence of legally enforceable terms.”

Because responsibility is less clearly defined under public sector operations and there are no stipulations for penalties for non-performance, accountability can become diffused and incentives to perform weak.

If the requirements for the private sector include a performance bond and corporate guarantee, how can the public sector offer similar forms of security to assure an equal basis of comparison?

Risk: The public proposal places 100 percent of the risk at the public sector's doorstep. With a public-private partnership, much of the risk is allocated to the private sector.

(The actual percentage of allocated risk will vary from partnership to partnership.) As all risks have an economic consequence, the risk allocated to the private sector should be valued and that value added to the public's proposed cost.

Contract enforcement: The contractual relationship between the municipality and its work force may be problematic. How can a municipality enter into an enforceable contract with itself? How can the public work force guarantee its own performance?

The only legal relationships between the government and its employees are the traditional employer-employee relationship and a union contract. MOUs, statements of intent or agreements in principle may look good on the surface, but ultimately, the taxpayers will foot the bills for broken promises.

Labor problems: There is a chance that the existing work force will end up working for a firm with which it competed. More often than not, managed competition sets up an “us versus them; win at all costs” environment that can lead to bitterness, frustration and undue anxiety.

We prize sportsmanship in our society, but when one is involved in a do-or-die struggle, it is almost impossible to lose gracefully.

Consequently, the best approach is to pursue privatization by considering only qualified private sector firms, while taking great care to protect the rights and interests of the existing work force.

If local decision-makers consider what is best overall — for the municipality, ratepayers and the existing work force — they may find that this is the most rational course of action.

Doug Herbst is manager of corporate development, Professional Services Group, Houston.

Tags: Public Works & Utilities

Related


  • The uncertain future of community composting in New York City
    After roughly a decade of service in New York City, the last two community composting sites will not have their leases renewed. These sites are situated on land belonging to the city’s Parks Department: the Lower East Side Ecology Center is at Corlears Hook Park in Lower Manhattan, and Big Reuse is located under the […]
  • How Philadelphia is aiming for zero waste
    The city of Philadelphia has long collected data on city properties’ waste generation and leveraged it to improve waste management, but now it’s honing in on the commercial sector too, realizing this will be crucial to hitting Philly’s zero waste targets. Today it runs a voluntary program where both municipal and commercial operations do detailed […]
  • Cleveland launches program to create circular rconomy
    The City of Cleveland and Cleveland Neighborhood Progress announced the launch of Circular Cleveland, a two-year initiative to develop and implement circular economy strategies and programs in Cleveland. Inspired by similar models in cities around the world, the circular economy is a comprehensive approach to provide community-wide benefits by designing waste and pollution out of our economic system, keeping […]
  • St. Lucie county adds foam polystyrene recycling program
    St. Lucie County, Fla., residents and businesses will now be able to recycle more foam polystyrene products, thanks to a $50,000 grant from the Foam Recycling Coalition. After starting a single-stream program in 2014, St. Lucie County has seen a continuous increase in the tonnage being processed at the St. Lucie Materials Recovery Facility, as […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Expediting the reduction of road salt use in America
  • Building services provider helps Ohio county establish its own building code department
  • Vermont city uses sewer surveillance to halt spread of COVID-19
  • Industry and government collaboration key to addressing recycling challenges

White papers


How a unified HR system helps one public safety organization manage crews, payroll, and more in a single platform

7th January 2021

Your Roadmap to COVID-19 Funding

18th December 2020

The One Where Everyone Wins: A Mutually Beneficial Contracting Method

10th December 2020
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

The latest episode The Young Leaders Podcast focuses on Cyril Jefferson. Cyril is the youngest African American to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Hillsboro, Oregon is pioneering a new #renewableenergy generation technology through a partnership with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

27th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

The impact of the #COVID19 pandemic on #telework was swift and profound. Now, the big question is whether – and to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Get ready for the can't-miss webinar on how to kickstart your efficiency improvement plan with Luke Anderson of… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

Among all states headed into the 2020 general election, which ones have voting populations that are the most demogr… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

26th October 2020
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts in our readership survey to help us shape future content so that we c… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

See how cities different approaches to distribute masks in their communities >> spr.ly/6010GAPLa

23rd October 2020
AmerCityCounty

While #facialrecognition is a powerful tool that can improve law enforcement efficiency, that doesn’t necessarily t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

23rd October 2020

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X