https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


NLC survey shows cities to be cautiously optimistic

NLC survey shows cities to be cautiously optimistic

Washington, D.C. - Careful budgeting, a generally favorable economic climate and a growing array of productivity improvements are helping improve the
  • Written by American City & County Administrator
  • 1st September 1996

Washington, D.C. – Careful budgeting, a generally favorable economic climate and a growing array of productivity improvements are helping improve the fiscal health of most U.S. cities and towns, according to the National League of Cities’ (NLC’s) 1996 Survey of City Fiscal Conditions. The survey found a trend of steady but slow growth since 1993 in general fund balances and a prevalence of optimism in the fiscal outlook for cities. Most of the 381 cities responding to the survey are maintaining service levels, and more than one-quarter said they are increasing services, especially in the area of public safety.

Over the past two years, however, more than one-quarter of the respondents said their expenditures outpaced revenues and even more are projecting shortfalls this year.

An overall assessment of constant-dollar changes in local budgets revealed that both revenues and expenditures have grown at an annual rate of less than 1 percent over past three years.

Keeping up with infrastructure needs has become a major concern for 56 percent of the cities, and 31 percent cited the high cost of providing employee health benefits and paying for costly environmental mandates as pressure points on their budgets. Two analyses of federal and state fiscal actions included in the survey report also raise concerns about the potential for shifting responsibilities and the impacts on local budgets.

“The leaders of America’s cities and towns have demonstrated a tremendous degree of leadership, perseverance, collaboration and innovation in managing the resources and meeting the needs of their communities,” says NLC President Greg Lashutka, mayor of Columbus, Ohio. “They are using new techniques to find savings and improve performance, and they are using those skills to carry out the old-fashioned responsibilities of public service: to do what’s right, to do what’s necessary, to make do with what you’ve got, and to get everyone into a bipartisan process for making it happen. And if you think there’s a message in what I just said, I think you’re right, and I hope it gets heard.”

The NLC report used ad analysis of year-end general fund carry-overs, or balances, to develop an overall profile of the financial health of the nation’s cities and towns over the past 10 years. Cities maintain a general fund balance as a financial reserve to manage cash flow, to maintain a sound credit rating and to deal with unforeseen revenue or expenditure variations. The analysis examined the year-end carry-over as a percentage of general fund expenditures in that particular year. This year’s survey and data from earlier years showed steady growth of ending balances from 1993 through 1996 after three years of declining balances.

Several findings in this year’s NLC report offer additional insights about ways that local governments responded to those fiscal pressures. Two significant survey responses dealt with infrastructure needs and capital spending, which often bear the brunt of budget austerity.

The percentage of cities reporting lower levels of capital spending declined for the fourth consecutive year, which indicates that most cities are now increasing – or at least maintaining – their allocation of resources for community upkeep.

“This is not done easily, however,” Lashutka says. “In the assessment of pressure points in local budgets, infrastructure and capital needs led the list of unfavorable able factors, mentioned by 56 percent of the cities.”

Other adverse factors mentioned most often included environmental mandates, the cost of public employee health benefits, changes in the local economy and costs associated with crime and criminal justice.

Among the 27 percent of the cities that increased service levels during the past year, public safety activities dominated the examples provided by survey respondents.

Examples of productivity improvements described by survey respondents this year included privatization of investment management services in Naperville, Ill., which yielded savings of $600,000 and enabled city staff to handle other duties; a reconfigured emergency medical services program in Gresham, Ore., that provided better services and a savings of $279,000 and revision of the billing cycle for water and sewer bills in Raleigh, N.C., which generated $300,000 in administrative cost savings.

Additionally, Milwaukee reorganized its public works department and saved an estimated $2.5 million through better coordination of activities, Philadelphia’s “productivity bank,” which keeps track of initiatives taken throughout city government to improve delivery of services, has accumulated overall savings of $19.8 million since 1994; and interlocal agreements and joint activities have helped West-minster, Colo; Avondale, Ariz.; Greenville, S.C.; and Grand Prairie, Tex., provide better services and save money.

“These kinds of initiatives are bottom-line proof of the power of positive thinking in municipal government,” said NLC Executive Director Donald J. Borut. “These efforts are also helping to instill a growing sense of confidence in the fiscal capacity of our cities. Two out of three respondents – 65 percent – said they felt better able to meet their cities’ fiscal needs in 1996 than they were in 1995.”

And because they have to be fiscally accountable for their actions, municipal leaders also enacted a number of increases in taxes and user fees to keep the ledgers balanced.

Borut also pointed out several potentially troubling findings in this year’s survey.

“Although most cities have seen a general recovery and are keeping revenues ahead of expenditures, more than one in four cities are spending more than they collect,” he says. “That was the experience in both 1994 and 1995, and more than half of the cities said it could happen this year in the absence of corrective actions. This should alert us that not all cities are in an upturn and that structural economic and fiscal problems may also he present.”

Another caution signal appeared in a constant-dollar analysis of revenues and expenditures in this year’s survey. Municipal revenues have grown at an average annual rate of 0.7 percent over the past three years, well below the annual growth rates of 2.6 percent recorded between 1986-89, and even below the 1.7 percent growth rate during the recessionary period of 1990-92. Expenditure growth measured in constant dollars fell even more sharply to an annual rate of 0.3 percent over the past three years.

The NLC survey was conducted by Michael Pagano, professor of political science at Miami University, Oxford, Ohio, who also wrote the report. The university’s Center for Public Management and Regional Affairs carried out the data management tasks. Herbert Green, NLC’s research manager, coordinated the work done in the survey project. The 381 cities in the survey included 31 of the 51 largest U.S. cities, 45 percent of the cities with populations above 100,000, and 35 percent of the cities with populations between 50,000 and 100,000.

The survey was also sent to a random sample of cities and towns with populations between 10,000 and 50,000, from which 164 responses were received.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • Report: Reforming emergency dispatch won't be easy, but it's necessary
    Over the last several years, reforming law enforcement has been a primary topic of discussion in communities across the nation. Discourse has mostly centered around the challenges agencies face in addressing the complex needs of those in mental health crisis, and the disparity of experience among community members depending on their race. But in this […]
  • Bloomberg
    Three U.S. cities to adopt Bloomberg Philanthropies Mayors Challenge-winning project to combat climate change
    Bloomberg Philanthropies has announced that seven global cities, including three in the United States, will be adopting Stockholm’s Biochar Project, which turns plant waste from parks and homes into a charcoal-like substance that residents can use in their yards to help combat climate change. The project was the winner of the 2014 Bloomberg Philanthropies European […]
  • 10 cities ideal for hybrid or full-time telecommuters seeking an outdoor lifestyle
    When the pandemic was first realized, cities emptied out, highways were suddenly devoid of cars and storefronts shuttered overnight. The assumption in many communities was that it would last for a few months and then everything would return to normal—those who’d left would return to their office jobs and apartments.  But these two years later, […]
  • NLC survey shows cities to be cautiously optimistic
    Take American City & County's budgeting survey
    With the recently passed infrastructure-related legislation by the federal government, local administrators across the United States are poised to make historic investments into their communities.  Given the generational precedence of this action, we’re curious about the state of local budgets—what expense lines are increasing the fastest year-over-year? In what area has federal funding been the […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • North Texas alliance partners with Marketplace.city on smart government solutions
  • Harris County deploys next-generation security in 150 public buildings
  • Public procurement can be transformative for stakeholders in a community
  • The 10 Most Sustainable Large U.S. Cities

White papers


How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Please take this brief survey and let us know how your organization is managing your budg… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

30th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Report: Reforming emergency dispatch won’t be easy, but it’s necessary dlvr.it/ST7kQ5

30th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Three U.S. cities to adopt Bloomberg Philanthropies Mayors Challenge-winning project to combat climate change dlvr.it/ST4bjk

29th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

10 cities ideal for hybrid or full-time telecommuters seeking an outdoor lifestyle dlvr.it/ST4T5g

29th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Take American City & County’s budgeting survey dlvr.it/ST0qQP

28th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Six cities and counties will take stock of underutilized assets in Rethinking Revenue incubator dlvr.it/ST0ZVp

28th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Seamless Cooperative Experience Saves Indiana City Exponentially in Time and Money dlvr.it/SSxp95

27th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

10 best large cities for fishing dlvr.it/SSxbSZ

27th June 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X