https://www.americancityandcounty.com/wp-content/themes/acc_child/assets/images/logo/footer-logo.png
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcast
  • Resources & Events
    • Back
    • Resources
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • Municipal Cost Index – Archive
    • Equipment Watch Page
    • American City & County Awards
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Privacy Statement
    • Terms of Service
American City and County
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Co-op Solutions
  • Hybrid Work
  • Commentaries
  • News
  • In-Depth
  • Multimedia
    • Back
    • Podcasts
  • Resources/Events
    • Back
    • Webinars
    • White Papers/eBooks
    • IWCE 2022
    • How to Contribute
    • American City & County Awards
    • Municipal Cost Index
    • Equipment Watch Page
  • About Us
    • Back
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Cookie Policy
    • Privacy Stament
    • Terms of Service
  • newsletter
  • Administration
  • Economy & Finance
  • Procurement
  • Public Safety
  • Public Works & Utilities
  • Smart Cities & Technology
  • Magazine
acc.com


ODOT compensates for wetland impacts

ODOT compensates for wetland impacts

As one of the state's largest land developers, the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) uses large amounts of land for a statewide transportation
  • Written by American City & County Administrator
  • 1st August 1996

As one of the state’s largest land developers, the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) uses large amounts of land for a statewide transportation system that serves the needs of Ohio’s citizens. And like all responsible land developers, ODOT seeks to perform that duty while at the same time recognizing and respecting nature and the environment.

ODOT members have begun exploring the uses of a concept called “Wetland Banking,” a means by which the department can easily and cost effectively compensate for wetland impacts caused by highway construction projects.

While ODOT must contend with regulations that limit the use of banking, there is real hope that it will be an increasingly valuable tool for future use.

Wetlands are defined as land areas that are saturated either with ground or surface water for such a duration and frequency that they can, and usually do, support “hyrdophytic vegetation,” or plants that grow in wet soil.

Wetlands generally include swamps, bogs and marshes. They may also include areas not typically thought of as wetlands, such as seasonally wet forests.

The Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1977 places stringent controls on these areas to prevent destruction that could affect water supply or aquatic life. Any developer seeking to construct a project that may require the loss of an acre or more of wetlands must notify — or apply for a permit from — the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Under the CWA, the developer must first seek to avoid wetlands. If this cannot be done, the developer should then use design and/or construction methods to minimize impacts on wetlands.

Any remaining wetland impacts can then be mitigated by creation of new wetlands or restoration of former wetlands. Once built, the wetland must be monitored by the developer for five years to make sure it is self-sustaining or “viable.” This can create problems if there is not enough additional land to compensate. And, there may be other reasons that mitigation along the project may not be workable.

For ODOT, wetland mitigation can be awkward and expensive. ODOT currently has nearly 100 projects that will require filling in wetlands. While most will destroy only small areas, about 28 projects will require permits and compensatory mitigation.

Mitigation on site or adjacent to the site can be difficult to plan when there are already developments all around a project. Mitigation on a landscape not meant to sustain a wetland can fail. The cost of these efforts can range anywhere from $66,000 to $306,000 per acre, and some of these costs are fixed no matter how big or small the area of compensation is.

Wetland mitigation banking offers a solution of sorts to this problem. The concept is similar to a financial bank. A developer can work on creating an area of wetlands independent of the project site. The developer receives credits for the work that is done. Those credits are then applied or sold to another developer for any later project where wetlands are destroyed and cannot be mitigated on site.

ODOT believes that this system has several significant benefits. Using a banking system, mitigation for several projects can be combined in one area. This means that the effort of designing several areas can be replaced with one design. Since the area is selected for its suitability instead of its location, success is much more certain.

By grouping mitigation wetlands into a selected area, they can be managed and monitored effectively for the five years required by law.

A non-profit organization known as the Ohio Wetlands Foundation has created wetland banks in Ohio. Developers are allowed to buy sections of these banks as credits for wetlands losses.

Currently, ODOT has mitigated three acres of loss by buying credits from a bank and has recently made the necessary arrangements to mitigate a portion of 38.25 acres of loss on another project.

“The cost of buying into the mitigation bank is only 25 percent of our least expensive mitigation to date,” says Tom Linkous, an environmental manager with ODOT and a supporter of the Ohio Wetland Foundation Bank.

“The sections will more than likely be successful because the site was chosen for its ability to sustain wetlands. This represents a responsible use of resources,” he says.

Wetland banking, however, is only employed as an alternative choice. Under the rules of the CWA, banking is only employed to the extent that mitigation cannot be effectively employed on site or adjacent to the site.

“ODOT is responsible for replacing wetlands `in kind,”‘ says John Baird, an environmental specialist with ODOT. “That is, on the project site and of the same hydrological and biological type as the wetlands destroyed. As necessary, we can replace wetlands `out of kind.’ That is, on site but with different physical characteristics if it’s more viable. It is only when these two possibilities are exhausted or unviable that we can go off site to a wetland mitigation bank.”

Fred Steck, an environmental supervisor with ODOT, adds that there is a very good reason for this preference. “There is a real need to replace wetlands on or near their original site to maintain the ecological balance of the area, he says. There is no guarantee though, that a wetland created on site will be self-sustaining.

“This is still a new science. It’s still evolving,” he says.

Tags:

Most Recent


  • Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come
    When the pandemic struck in 2020, public retention was hit hard: jobs in local government plummeted by 8.5 percent; state employment dropped by 4.4 percent. Two years later, local and state government jobs have rebounded by about half—to 4.1 and 1.9 percent below pre-pandemic levels respectively, according to a new report from Mission Square Research […]
  • Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships
    The so-called “American dream” of upward mobility has more or less stagnated: Today, a little more than 40 percent of children raised at the bottom of the income ladder remain there as adults, according to Pew Charitable Trusts, and only half grow up to earn more than their parents. This data points to a concerning […]
  • hybrid technology
    Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making
    There’s one kind of technology that state and local governments covet, says Rob Carey, president of Cloudera Government Solutions. “While supporting multiple state and local government agencies, our team has noticed an increase in the need for hybrid cloud solutions.” A hybrid cloud is the combination of both public and private cloud deployment models. In […]
  • Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
    Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses
    After two years of ping-pong lockdown orders, mask mandates, unprecedented vaccine drives and economic uncertainty, cities across the United States are beginning to emerge in the pandemic’s aftermath, and they’re prioritizing infrastructure, according to a report published Wednesday by the National League of Cities (NLC).  “The new normal, as we now understand it, is here,” […]

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your American City and County account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • NLC releases State of Cities 2021 report
  • How governments can keep employees safe as they return to work
  • Lessons from your friendly neighborhood public service employees
  • North Texas alliance partners with Marketplace.city on smart government solutions

White papers


How to Assemble a Rockstar Website Redesign Steering Committee

7th June 2022

Hand Hygiene: Compliance Matters

23rd May 2022

What it Takes to Build a Winning Esports Program

23rd May 2022
view all

Events


PODCAST


Young Leaders Episode 4 – Cyril Jefferson – City Councilman, High Point, North Carolina

13th October 2020

Young Leaders Episode 3 – Shannon Hardin – City Council President, Columbus, Ohio

27th July 2020

Young Leaders Episode 2 – Christian Williams – Development Services Planner, Goodyear, Ariz.

1st July 2020
view all

Twitter


AmerCityCounty

Report: Local and state governments are facing a retention crisis; the worst could be yet to come dlvr.it/SSnmS7

24th June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid an unprecedented increase in federal spending, cities and counties stand to benefit from partnerships dlvr.it/SSkGBn

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Governments using technology to harness data and improve decision-making dlvr.it/SSk3H0

23rd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Infrastructure highlighted by city leaders as top priority in analysis of 60 mayoral addresses dlvr.it/SSgBck

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Oklahoma City puts the focus on employees when implementing changes in office technology dlvr.it/SSfyns

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

We want to hear from you! Please take this brief survey and let us know how your organization is managing your budg… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

22nd June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Buying smart solutions: Technology is now part of (almost) every government purchase dlvr.it/SSbj3Z

21st June 2022
AmerCityCounty

Amid tech labor shortage, outsourcing digital services could provide relief dlvr.it/SSbj23

21st June 2022

Newsletters

Sign up for American City & County’s newsletters to receive regular news and information updates about local governments.

Resale Insights Dashboard

The Resale Insights Dashboard provides model-level data for the entire used equipment market to help you save time and money.

Municipal Cost Index

Updated monthly since 1978, our exclusive Municipal Cost Index shows the effects of inflation on the cost of providing municipal services

Media Kit and Advertising

Want to reach our digital audience? Learn more here.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • IWCE’s Urgent Communications
  • IWCE Expo

WORKING WITH US

  • About Us
  • Contact Us

FOLLOW American City and County ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X